Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Watch Out for Scammers!
We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!
Not a fan of ladders as I found the “flat spots” to be at different locations each time the test is done with the same combo of components. Instead, I use the OCW method, here is my progression.
Step
What I'm Doing
What I'm Looking For
Notes
1
Initial OCW 3-5 shots per group
POI Consistency from Chg Weight to Chg Weight, MV and Pressure Signs
MV Data: Im only looking at MV (not SD or ES) to see what charge weights my min required MV is met and if pressure is present at that MV where POI is consistent from increment to increment
2
Refined OCW 10-15 shots per group, adjacent CWs
POI consistency (repeated from initial OCW), group size at 100m and at 600m
If group size is not to my liking but MV and POI consistency is there, I go to seating depth testing in an additional session before going to step 3
3
Final validation - 40-60 rounds
MV Consistency (SD/ES), group size, elevation hold overs at various KDs vs predicted (either via FDAC or ballistic app), overall performance impressions
If SD/ES are reasonable (low double digits, high single digits across 40 rounds im good - i put the load into production.
If it all comes apart, i diagnose and re-group (honestly, this very rarely happens)