Rifle Scopes parallax and mirage, questions

rockwind1

Full Member
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 16, 2017
393
94
60
westworld
so I have been trying to get my parallax set really perfect lately and it is kind a hard, I was wondering how many people really worry about it,,,also, if you have some mirage bouncing the target around, it seems kind of hard to do the head bobble to fix the parallax,,,,any tips?

does anyone go to the trouble of putting some tape around the parallax and marking it at like every 50 yards?

it seems like one of those variable that can be fixed fairly easily but is it worth it?
 
As far as parallax; underestimate it at your peril.

For an example, I took a brand new shooter out with his very inexpensive new rifle setup (he had no idea what he was buying) that consisted of a hunting package from Savage. Was a pencil barrel 270WSM, plastic stock that weighed absolutely nothing and a 3-9 Nikon scope that was on par with the $49 scopes you see at Walmart. After showing him the basics of getting behind the gun, what's right and wrong, natural POA, rear bag manipulation, how his rifle/upper body/lower body need to be 3 segments of the same 'stick', correcting him as he screwed up he started getting decent groups at 100 yards with it.

Had him shoot some more and he was getting settled in as well as took some velocity readings. I shoot the gun and 2x5 round groups showed it was capable of .75 MOA which surprised the shit out of me.

I decided we were going to challenge him, and the setup and put a 40% IPSC plate out at 550 yards. I had the velocity and bullet information for his factory load and we built a range card for him. He didn't want to shoot first and wanted to watch (think he was a bit overwhelmed and also figured at 9x he wasn't even going to see the target) and I went, getting a 2nd round hit on the plate and handed him the gun.

I got behind the spotting scope and watched as he shot. First shot was 20+ inches low, but chalked it up to him never having shot past 100 yards but he confirmed he had a good shot. Had him shoot again and it was almost in the same spot the 1st shot was, so I called a correction. We came up something like 4.5 MOA and he was right under the target with the 3rd shot. Called another .5MOA and told him to prepare for a hit, and sure enough PING!

Other than him being besides himself, I was amazed as well that this basically bare bones gun even managed to do this.

So where's the part about the parallax, you ask?

Remember how I got a hit, yet someone with a different LOP, cheek position, head position and aspect through the scope than me all of a sudden needed a 4.5MOA adjustment to hit the exact target I just hit with the previous shot?

Parallax

To confirm it, I shot after he made his hit and blew the shot way over the top of the target; I'm willing to bet it was somewhere in the neighborhood of 4.5MOA.

As far as parallax/mirage, look at the reticle, NOT the target. If the reticle is bowing/bending at the corners, there's parallax. This will be the indicator with or without mirage.
 
Well, I mean, I do Adjust for parallax but I just focus the image as well as I can and from what I understand, sometimes you can be in focus but the parallax can be off. I do run no scopes, night force, Kahles, s&b, steiner( I realize this is not in the same level as the others ). The Kahles Is almost impossible to focus and there is always Maroge out here in Nevada so I never know if the parallax is on. Kahles told me to just set the number on the adjustment knob for the distance but it just doesn’t seem right
Can you really get a 4.5 MOa Error in parallax? I had read that the most error you can get depends on the diameter of the objective lens?
 
The short answer is, you shouldn't be able to.

The long answer is, his scope is a POS China made scope designed to not be used past 100 yards. After it hit me why he needed a large adjustment after I had just got a hit, I looked through the scope and moved my head around; I could move the reticle around wherever I wanted it to go basically. It wasn't a 'free' scope, it was something that wasn't designed to do anything outside of sight it in once and shoot at a deer at <100 yards with once a year.

I just wanted to drive a point home with him that its not the equipment that will limit you (but was also very surprised he got a hit lol)

So with the difference in our LOPs, head positions, eye height, etc that was the difference in the reticle at 550ish yards. Overall, in even an entry level/budget scope there shouldn't be anything close to that amount of parallax yet there will be enough to add up to a miss.
 
When there's a lot of mirage, it can be harder to get a perfectly parallax-free sight picture. I typically set parallax by focusing the image instead of the head bob thing. I'll turn the parallax knob back and forth slightly to find the exact "center point" where the image is tack sharp. Or as sharp as I can get it, considering the amount of mirage. Works for me. Will depend on your scope as well.