Sure it has been discussed, but I still would like to hear some current opinions from guys who shoot both. As these compact LTR style rifles are becoming more accepted in the precision shooting community.
I am having APA (still prefer Patriot, Sorry Jered) build me a 308.
It is going to be a Remington 700 action, Broughton barrel, with APA's full treatment.
The critical factore to me are this.
1K is awesome, but the fact is my range is ~650 yards and 99% of my shooting is there, because it is an awesome facility.
I like the LTR sized rifle, and want to stay at 20" because it is so handy, and doesnt seem to be any compromise in my shooting. But, it will be threaded and will ultimately mount a suppressor.
I am not terribly concerned about the ballistics of giving up an additional 2", but it is something to consider. I am almost more concerned about aesthetics (heresy, LOL). I kind of think 20" is the sweet spot as far as looks. Any shorter and they begin to look unbalanced. Not a huge concern but it factors in for me.
What do you guys who own both think? Does a rifle with a 20" barrel seem appreciably less handy than an 18"? Especially if you plan to mount a suppressor. And is the 2" even enough to consider, ballistics-wise? For the record, I shoot exclusively hand loaded ammo with 175SMK's and 155 Scenars, but I want to go all Scenar.
I want 20", but am getting pressure from some buddies (whose opinion I trust) to go 18" and dont look back. Just want to make the right decision as this is my main bolt rifle.
I am having APA (still prefer Patriot, Sorry Jered) build me a 308.
It is going to be a Remington 700 action, Broughton barrel, with APA's full treatment.
The critical factore to me are this.
1K is awesome, but the fact is my range is ~650 yards and 99% of my shooting is there, because it is an awesome facility.
I like the LTR sized rifle, and want to stay at 20" because it is so handy, and doesnt seem to be any compromise in my shooting. But, it will be threaded and will ultimately mount a suppressor.
I am not terribly concerned about the ballistics of giving up an additional 2", but it is something to consider. I am almost more concerned about aesthetics (heresy, LOL). I kind of think 20" is the sweet spot as far as looks. Any shorter and they begin to look unbalanced. Not a huge concern but it factors in for me.
What do you guys who own both think? Does a rifle with a 20" barrel seem appreciably less handy than an 18"? Especially if you plan to mount a suppressor. And is the 2" even enough to consider, ballistics-wise? For the record, I shoot exclusively hand loaded ammo with 175SMK's and 155 Scenars, but I want to go all Scenar.
I want 20", but am getting pressure from some buddies (whose opinion I trust) to go 18" and dont look back. Just want to make the right decision as this is my main bolt rifle.