Wanting to get a suppressor for my TRG 42. Do I go with the titan or the quicksilver? No really wanting to be vauge but is one better than the other?
thanks
skog
thanks
skog
Suppressors QSM vs AAC
- Thread starter skog
- Start date
Re: QSM vs AAC
Th SS Titan offers th best sound reduction , the Titanium one is a little less but said to be very very good still.
Never heard QSM 338 can but I wasen't to impressed with their 308 or 223 cans , especialy for the money
Th SS Titan offers th best sound reduction , the Titanium one is a little less but said to be very very good still.
Never heard QSM 338 can but I wasen't to impressed with their 308 or 223 cans , especialy for the money
Re: QSM vs AAC
Check out Major-Malfunction.com. Bryon has both and you may want to talk to him so he can help you decide.
Check out Major-Malfunction.com. Bryon has both and you may want to talk to him so he can help you decide.
Re: QSM vs AAC
+1 for AAC (if you can find them.) Their products are state of the art, and their customer service is the best I have found in the firearms industry. They are worth the wait. PS Kevin...where's my Cyclone? (just kiddin')
+1 for AAC (if you can find them.) Their products are state of the art, and their customer service is the best I have found in the firearms industry. They are worth the wait. PS Kevin...where's my Cyclone? (just kiddin')
Re: QSM vs AAC
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Walt Her</div><div class="ubbcode-body">+1 for AAC (if you can find them.) Their products are state of the art, and their customer service is the best I have found in the firearms industry. They are worth the wait. PS Kevin...where's my Cyclone? (just kiddin') </div></div>
Well that is a first. lol
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Walt Her</div><div class="ubbcode-body">+1 for AAC (if you can find them.) Their products are state of the art, and their customer service is the best I have found in the firearms industry. They are worth the wait. PS Kevin...where's my Cyclone? (just kiddin') </div></div>
Well that is a first. lol
Re: QSM vs AAC
I've always had great customer service with them as well.
I've always had great customer service with them as well.
Re: QSM vs AAC
AAC has been good to me as well. Had a light endcap strike on my M-4 2000. Sent in the suppressor, barrel, and phantom style mount. During shipping, the phantom mount was bent. When I received my gear back, my barrel was sporting a new blackout mount at no cost to me.
AAC has been good to me as well. Had a light endcap strike on my M-4 2000. Sent in the suppressor, barrel, and phantom style mount. During shipping, the phantom mount was bent. When I received my gear back, my barrel was sporting a new blackout mount at no cost to me.
Re: QSM vs AAC
AAC has always given me great customer service. I recently bought a second-hand silencer mount and it didn't come with any rocksett; Mike quickly mailed me several bottles and a big package of AAC stickers, free of charge. They've done that sort of thing for me several times.
AAC has always given me great customer service. I recently bought a second-hand silencer mount and it didn't come with any rocksett; Mike quickly mailed me several bottles and a big package of AAC stickers, free of charge. They've done that sort of thing for me several times.
Re: QSM vs AAC
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: glock63</div><div class="ubbcode-body">AAC has been good to me as well. Had a light endcap strike on my M-4 2000. Sent in the suppressor, barrel, and phantom style mount. During shipping, the phantom mount was bent. When I received my gear back, my barrel was sporting a new blackout mount at no cost to me. </div></div>
Sorry, off topic.
What did they do when you sent it back? I had an endcap strike with mine a couple of months ago too, and just tapped it back down flat. The problem was some no-name bullets that were given to me and I reloaded, apparently the concave bases weren't consistent and were making them yaw. I've been shooting it ever since with no problems, just wondering what they did to it for you.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: glock63</div><div class="ubbcode-body">AAC has been good to me as well. Had a light endcap strike on my M-4 2000. Sent in the suppressor, barrel, and phantom style mount. During shipping, the phantom mount was bent. When I received my gear back, my barrel was sporting a new blackout mount at no cost to me. </div></div>
Sorry, off topic.
What did they do when you sent it back? I had an endcap strike with mine a couple of months ago too, and just tapped it back down flat. The problem was some no-name bullets that were given to me and I reloaded, apparently the concave bases weren't consistent and were making them yaw. I've been shooting it ever since with no problems, just wondering what they did to it for you.
Re: QSM vs AAC
The quicksilver is kind of spendy, but the .308 version is a top performer for sound reduction.
Whether the stainless titan is quieter is up in the air as I've never seen results of either companies .338 independently tested.
They are probably both good choices. I have a customer who bought a Titan in stainless steel and I think even the large titanium product from quicksilver will probably weigh the same (the titan is like 42 ounces, the QSM product is probably right in that ballpark).
The Titan might be cheaper. I don't recall what both are going for.
The quicksilver is kind of spendy, but the .308 version is a top performer for sound reduction.
Whether the stainless titan is quieter is up in the air as I've never seen results of either companies .338 independently tested.
They are probably both good choices. I have a customer who bought a Titan in stainless steel and I think even the large titanium product from quicksilver will probably weigh the same (the titan is like 42 ounces, the QSM product is probably right in that ballpark).
The Titan might be cheaper. I don't recall what both are going for.
Re: QSM vs AAC
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Red_SC</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: glock63</div><div class="ubbcode-body">AAC has been good to me as well. Had a light endcap strike on my M-4 2000. Sent in the suppressor, barrel, and phantom style mount. During shipping, the phantom mount was bent. When I received my gear back, my barrel was sporting a new blackout mount at no cost to me. </div></div>
Sorry, off topic.
What did they do when you sent it back? I had an endcap strike with mine a couple of months ago too, and just tapped it back down flat. The problem was some no-name bullets that were given to me and I reloaded, apparently the concave bases weren't consistent and were making them yaw. I've been shooting it ever since with no problems, just wondering what they did to it for you. </div></div>
There wasnt enough damage to merit any type of repair. I simply wanted them to check out the concentricity of the barrel threads and QD mounts. Everything was good to go, and Ive had no problems since. Just a fluke round I guess.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Red_SC</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: glock63</div><div class="ubbcode-body">AAC has been good to me as well. Had a light endcap strike on my M-4 2000. Sent in the suppressor, barrel, and phantom style mount. During shipping, the phantom mount was bent. When I received my gear back, my barrel was sporting a new blackout mount at no cost to me. </div></div>
Sorry, off topic.
What did they do when you sent it back? I had an endcap strike with mine a couple of months ago too, and just tapped it back down flat. The problem was some no-name bullets that were given to me and I reloaded, apparently the concave bases weren't consistent and were making them yaw. I've been shooting it ever since with no problems, just wondering what they did to it for you. </div></div>
There wasnt enough damage to merit any type of repair. I simply wanted them to check out the concentricity of the barrel threads and QD mounts. Everything was good to go, and Ive had no problems since. Just a fluke round I guess.
Re: QSM vs AAC
ok, thanks.
ok, thanks.
Re: QSM vs AAC
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HPLLC</div><div class="ubbcode-body">They are probably both good choices. I have a customer who bought a Titan in stainless steel and I think even the large titanium product from quicksilver will probably weigh the same (the titan is like 42 ounces, the QSM product is probably right in that ballpark).
The Titan might be cheaper. I don't recall what both are going for. </div></div>
The Titan is substantially cheaper, $1650 MSRP and much less from a dealer like Maj Malfunction. The Ti QSM is $2100 MSRP and actually weighs 1oz more than the SS Titan at 43oz. The Ti Titan is more than the QSM but only weighs like 22oz, so the QSM is probably more comparable to the SS Titan.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HPLLC</div><div class="ubbcode-body">They are probably both good choices. I have a customer who bought a Titan in stainless steel and I think even the large titanium product from quicksilver will probably weigh the same (the titan is like 42 ounces, the QSM product is probably right in that ballpark).
The Titan might be cheaper. I don't recall what both are going for. </div></div>
The Titan is substantially cheaper, $1650 MSRP and much less from a dealer like Maj Malfunction. The Ti QSM is $2100 MSRP and actually weighs 1oz more than the SS Titan at 43oz. The Ti Titan is more than the QSM but only weighs like 22oz, so the QSM is probably more comparable to the SS Titan.
Similar threads
Suppressors ECCO Machine and AAC 762SD
