Questions from the 2000 Census (Clinton)

[Tucker301]

What is this person's ancestry or ethnic origin?
Does this person speak a language other than English at home?
What is this language?
How well does this person speak English?
What state or country was this person from?
Is this person a citizen of the United States?
If the person was not born in the United States, when did he come to live in the United States?
Did this person live in this house or apartment 5 years ago?
Where did this person live 5 years ago?

So now it's an issue?

Source

History of the U.S. Census Bureau

Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.

www.census.gov

 

[cornhusker86]

Supposedly the Donald is going to issue an EO tomorrow that addresses the matter. I hope he grows a set and actually does it.

 

[Rthur]

As it effects representation on the hill why wouldn't it be required?
Usual outrage over the shit they've done themselves.
Strange, they were all "no foreign election influence" and this is exactly what "foreign election influence" looks like.
If they thought they'd vote R there would be mini guns on the border and a 50 foot wall.

R

 

[ArmyJerry]

he better get a fucking pair, the supremes are a less than equal branch.

Supposedly the Donald is going to issue an EO tomorrow that addresses the matter. I hope he grows a set and actually does it.

 

[Tucker301]

Speaking of representation, I had this thought the other day. If the whole original issue was taxation without representation, then why is representation without taxation not an equal issue? Meaning that there's a shit ton of Democrats who don't work, don't pay into the system, and are parasitic, so why should they get a vote at all?

 

[memyselfi]

Speaking of representation, I had this thought the other day. If the whole original issue was taxation without representation, then why is representation without taxation not an equal issue? Meaning that there's a shit ton of Democrats who don't work, don't pay into the system, and are parasitic, so why should they get a vote at all?

^^^^^^^^^^^^What he said ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Rthur]

Speaking of representation, I had this thought the other day. If the whole original issue was taxation without representation, then why is representation without taxation not an equal issue? Meaning that there's a shit ton of Democrats who don't work, don't pay into the system, and are parasitic, so why should they get a vote at all?

Logic says they were purposely "built" to ensure a reliable voter base.
They don't GAF how high taxes go, they aren't paying them.
Always wondered this myself.

R

 

[Dewey7271]

From the first election

in 1789, America's first presidential election is held. Voters cast ballots to choose state electors; only (redacted) men who owned property were allowed to vote. As expected, George Washington won the election and was sworn into office on April 30, 1789.

I would have no issue with only those with chips in the game get to vote. Can you imagine the uproar if that happened?

 

[Rthur]

Poll: 5-in-9 Hispanics Support Asking U.S. Citizenship Question on Census

Hispanic Americans support President Trump's effort to ask respondents on the 2020 Census whether or not they are an American citizen.

www.breitbart.com

R