• New Contest Starting Now! This Target Haunts Me

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

Rifle Scopes range finders

Re: range finders

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dgp5014</div><div class="ubbcode-body">swarovski is the best on the market. Its rated out to 1500, but in perfect conditions it will read out to 1800 </div></div>



Yep, I've ranged Elk at 1800+ with mine, next up is the Zeiss a good 1300 yard range finder that will do 1500 sometimes. The Zeiss and the Swaro are both better than the Lieca's IME although not as small
 
Re: range finders

I really like my Leica CRF 1200 due to its size. It is perfect for nearly every hunting application.

The Swarovski is great, but its a little larger and more costly. If you want to range over 1,000 yards the Swarovski is the way to go.
 
Re: range finders

The leica works well. The swarovski works great. But the aim circle on the swarzki is way to big. Does anyone here have a leica that they don't like and why? I am looking at one to buy in the next day or so. My lupey is not what I want.
 
Re: range finders

Leica CRF 1200 is a great pocket sized rangefinder. 500 yards is not a problem even on non-reflective surfaces. I routinely range out to 1000 yards with mine on stumps, trees, etc. The glass in it also makes it a decent pocket spotting monocular for what it is. It's small and light. It truly fits in your pocket.
 
Re: range finders

When does it not want to work? I hear of people not liking them and cant figure out why. Tried the one at the store today and it worked great just outside. That doesnt mean I got to try it out the way I wanted to. I just would like to know what owners think before dropping that kind of money.
 
Re: range finders

The only time I don't like the CRF 1200 is when I am trying to range at the upper end of it's ability. It will range to 1200, but you'll need something the size of a truck to range at that distance consistently.
 
Re: range finders

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RobertB</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What about deer at a grand? Is that out of the question?
</div></div>

Probably not. But one past 1100 would most likely be out of the question, unless it had a large tree or boulder close to it.
 
Re: range finders

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RobertB</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The leica works well. The swarovski works great. But the aim circle on the swarzki is way to big. Does anyone here have a leica that they don't like and why? I am looking at one to buy in the next day or so. My lupey is not what I want. </div></div> i have a leica lrf 1200 an dit not working so until i get it fixed my not very happy them it right know but when it was working i loved it
 
Re: range finders

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RobertB</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When does it not want to work? I hear of people not liking them and cant figure out why. Tried the one at the store today and it worked great just outside. That doesnt mean I got to try it out the way I wanted to. I just would like to know what owners think before dropping that kind of money. </div></div>

I had a nikon 1200. That pos broke. Now I have a Leica 1200. Works great. Took a 50mph tumble and still works. Doesn't work well/at all in rain/fog. Thinking of getting a swarvarski (sp?) as a back up.