Re: Redding Body die
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: samson</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Help me out here. I was always under the impression that unless you had a custom made FL die made to one of your fire formed cases that neck sizing was the "better" way to go because it didn't resize the case like a FL die does and unless you had a custom made FL die you were resizing your case to something slightly different than your specific chamber.
Does that make any sense??? </div></div>
There are a raft of arguments on both sides, and the conclusion is dependent of the intended use and other typically non-stated goals and asperations.
For very excellent shooters in competition, FL sizing wins more often
For pretty tollerable shooters outside of competition, it maters little
For shooters not down the learning curve, it maters not one iota
For real tactical applications, it maters not
For benchrest shooting, it can be the difference between winning and loosing
For REAL benchrest shooting, fitted cases are often used--these aren't even ever sized
For bragging rights, FL sizing can usually win
For "hey that's a really good group", its back to "it really doesn't mater"
For longest brass life, NO sizing wins big (about 3X, 25 reloads w/o annealing, 50+ with)
For fun of working with the tools and reloading gear, NO wins
For the most part, the bullet choice is more important than how the case is sized.
For the most part, the precision to which the load development was carried is more important than how the case was sized.
For the most part, the precision to which the charge is metered and trickled is more important than how the case was sized.
For the most part, the repeatability of the cartrige assembly is more important than how the case was sized.
For the most part, the accuracy of the shooter is more important than how the case was sized.
But once you get all these other ducks in a row, how the case gets sized does show up.
{Flame away}