• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

Not trying to be a smart ass but what info are you looking for? They're machined pieces of metal, either steel or aluminum. The biggest difference is going to be with the weight between the two. I've been running an aluminum base and rings from Seekins Precision for a couple of years now and I have no complaints.
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

disclaimer{I am not a secret squirrell type and have zero
operational experiance }
But the way it was explained to me was youre trying to add
as much weight to youre rifle as possible to negate some of the effects of recoil and you try to add where you can .
I was told to go Badger (steel)
instead I went with Seekins (aluminum) I did not see
a big difference in adding an ounce or so
Also badger was afew bucks more but ive never heard anyone complain about either of them
like I said im not sure either but thats what I was told.
if im completely off please let me know
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

The only issue i know of is lapping aluminum rings. Lapping compound usually embeds itself in the aluminum because its a soft metal.

Other than that, thats really it. Both will do what you need of them.
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

Panzies use aluminium
Barbarians use steel

You decide
laugh.gif
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

most companies that are making quality rings (badger, seekins, nightforce, EGW, larue etc.) offer rings in both aluminum and steel

some of the larger ring sets , like the SSDS/USMC set weigh darn near a pound just for the rings (steel)

the design of tactical rings are such that whether they are made from steel or aluminum, they do their job well

most have two or sometimes more ring cap screws per SIDE of the ring, and the picatinny rail slots are designed so that the rings have a matching 'rail' on the ring bottom that goes in the slot to mitigate ring/optic movement under recoil

i use aluminum almost exclusively, because i want to save the weight; your big three in a rifle for weight are
barreled action, stock and optics package

any weight saved is good in my opinion ; and my rifls still end up weighing 10.5 -14lbs depending on how they are spec'd -

this is down though from several i owned that were 15-18lbs

you can expect longevity from aluminum - buy a good quality ring from the companies listed and they will stand behind their product;
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

Little hijack. I was always under the impressiion that aluminum bases will flex on a steel receiver under heat causing zero shift issues. Is this really an issue with high quality products?
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: David 33</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Little hijack. I was always under the impressiion that aluminum bases will flex on a steel receiver under heat causing zero shift issues. Is this really an issue with high quality products? </div></div>

I dont believe this. I doubt an action will get hot enough to change the mechanical properties of the aluminum. Aluminum that the better manufactures use is high quality stuff and you should not see/have any problems. I don't lap high quality rings either.

Steel might be better if you are abit hard on your rifles but both will work, just buy quality ones the first time.

I use seekins rings, had no problems, they are a great product.


Cheers

Pete
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LoneWolfUSMC</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Quality is more important than material.

It's highly unlikely that you will notice a difference (other than weight) between the two. On some rifles I have aluminum. On others I have steel. I try to stick with aluminum when possible due to the weight issue.
</div></div>

I 2nd that
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

I'll add my vote to the how its made being more important than the material used. I had a discussion about it with Glen Seekins on the phone. He was extremely knowledgeable. After talking to him, I felt very confident in ordering a set of rings and bases from him. Once I recieved them, I knew I had made the correct decision. He really does do great work. I have a few sets of Leupold MK4 around, all steel and they are nice, but they don't compare to the fit and finish that the Seekins rings have.
 
Re: Rings - Aluminum VS Steel

Best quality rings do the job and are unlikely to fail before the scope does. Steel can rust or blemish and the aluminium's coatings wear faster. The quality is so high now that I go for aluminium (weight and less cold) except on classic style blued rifles.
Temperature change will effect the rifle action and barrel far more than anything thats to do with the rings. Get quality rings like Seekins, Badger or NF, the right height for your scope, and then once set up correctly don't worry about them.