• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Rifle Scopes Schmidt and bender durability and toughness, how durable are they? how does it compare to NF and every other brand?

sethwilliamd

Private
Minuteman
Apr 21, 2019
17
6
How durable and tough are Schmidt and bender scopes? Nightforce is legendary when it comes to taking abuse, But I’m wondering how does Schmidt compare? Are Schmidt’s tough? How do they compare in durability and toughness compared to other top scope brands?
 

Attachments

  • 24EECEEE-A7F7-472C-8D3F-F4444D3E02EA.jpeg
    24EECEEE-A7F7-472C-8D3F-F4444D3E02EA.jpeg
    11.8 KB · Views: 64
S&B are notorious for being delicate optics, thats why you will never find them on any military rifles.

NF is the way to go for toughness.
Theres tests been done where the NF was frozen to 0 degrees Kelvin and still held up to PRS abuse.
 
How durable and tough are Schmidt and bender scopes? Nightforce is legendary when it comes to taking abuse, But I’m wondering how does Schmidt compare? Are Schmidt’s tough? How do they compare in durability and toughness compared to other top scope brands?

The Schmidt & Bender PM II 3-12X was chosen by the United States Marine Corps to be their sniper rifle optical sight of choice 13 years ago and it's still serving.

Does that answer your question?

Free grammar lesson: plurals do not have apostrophes.
 
Last edited:
Theres tests been done where the NF was frozen to 0 degrees Kelvin and still held up to PRS abuse.

Nothing on this planet has ever achieved 0 Kelvin (-459 degrees F). If NF had actually managed to achieve this physically impossible feat they'd be the most valuable company on earth selling super conductors based electronic systems, not rifle scopes.
 
S&B are notorious for being delicate optics, thats why you will never find them on any military rifles.

NF is the way to go for toughness.
Theres tests been done where the NF was frozen to 0 degrees Kelvin and still held up to PRS abuse.
lmao that’s was awesome
 

Attachments

  • 51683258-5EC7-4C86-B261-1CA48794A724.gif
    51683258-5EC7-4C86-B261-1CA48794A724.gif
    4.6 MB · Views: 191
The Schmidt & Bender PM II 3-12X was chosen by the United States Marine Corps to be their sniper rifle optical sight of choice 13 years ago and it's still serving.

Does that answer your question?

Free grammar lesson: plurals do not have apostrophes.
It helps for sure , thank you. I’m also hoping to get some real world opinions from those that have used and owned both
 

Attachments

  • DBBE31A2-D6DC-42C1-B9ED-87FDD80829D5.png
    DBBE31A2-D6DC-42C1-B9ED-87FDD80829D5.png
    176.4 KB · Views: 118
*bias notice* I have S&B PM2 5-25 MTC. Whilst it has great glass, I'd never get another. I have dark dots on my glass from internal grease splatter. S&B want me to return it to Germany to be repaired at my cost (and significant time being in Australia). I know distance isn't S&B's fault, but they didn't really show any care or concern that the $4500 AUD scope had this issue within a week of purchase. If it was me, I'd go Nightforce or Vortex over S&B.
 
It helps for sure , thank you. I’m also hoping to get some real world opinions from those that have used and owned both

You asked about toughness. Nothing else needs to be said.

I don't know where you've been if you don't know how tough Schmidt Bender scopes really are.
 
*bias notice* I have S&B PM2 5-25 MTC. Whilst it has great glass, I'd never get another. I have dark dots on my glass from internal grease splatter. S&B want me to return it to Germany to be repaired at my cost (and significant time being in Australia). I know distance isn't S&B's fault, but they didn't really show any care or concern that the $4500 AUD scope had this issue within a week of purchase. If it was me, I'd go Nightforce or Vortex over S&B.

I have the same in my S&B. I love the scope otherwise, but my next high end scope will be a TT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sethwilliamd
Nothing on this planet has ever achieved 0 Kelvin (-459 degrees F). If NF had actually managed to achieve this physically impossible feat they'd be the most valuable company on earth selling super conductors based electronic systems, not rifle scopes.

don’t you just love how this form is notorious for spreading bad information. Why’d he delete his post lmao
 
  • Like
Reactions: sethwilliamd
You asked about toughness. Nothing else needs to be said.

I don't know where you've been if you don't know how tough Schmidt Bender scopes really are.
Hey thanks again for you input. Again, I’m hoping for input from some that has actually used both. (You said “nothing else needs to be said”) That is what needs to be said, their opinion.
As for where I’ve been, clearly not shooting a NF or a Schmidt, which is why I’m asking the question here.
 

Attachments

  • F85E7B20-0BFB-49DD-97D6-6881355D8276.jpeg
    F85E7B20-0BFB-49DD-97D6-6881355D8276.jpeg
    50.4 KB · Views: 74
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Soulezoo
don’t you just love how this form is notorious for spreading bad information. Why’d he delete his post lmao

It is literally the second post in the thread. How could you possibly miss it and think it has been deleted?

What "bad information" is this forum notorious for spreading?

S&B are notorious for being delicate optics, thats why you will never find them on any military rifles.

NF is the way to go for toughness.
Theres tests been done where the NF was frozen to 0 degrees Kelvin and still held up to PRS abuse.
 
I have owned and shot both. They are both tough scopes but my opinion only the Schmidt feels better built and I was able to see targets better at longer distances. Once again this is subjective. The NF is also a great scope and I did not have any issues with it either. Determine your use and see what features work for you. A good example are the turrets do you want locking or not do you want the turrets to have a feel when you hit every mil? Also what are the reticle options that you prefer. I am by no means a professional shooter but have had sometime behind each scope. In the end you can’t go wrong with either. Good luck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sethwilliamd
It is literally the second post in the thread. How could you possibly miss it and think it has been deleted?

What "bad information" is this forum notorious for spreading?

whoops. I went cross eyed and missed it.
And to answer your question, pretty much anything to do with science. Sorry I don’t log individuals making bad science post but maybe I should.

5999AFED-EFB2-4A3B-915F-EF9F03E2CED0.jpeg
 
  • Wow
Reactions: deersniper
I have a NXS 3-15 and a S&B 3-12. Both are tough but the S&B feels stouter...I have nothing scientific to base this off of. The S&B has tighter turrets and heavy, distinct clicks and super distinct MTC clicks. The NF has very crisp and audible clicks as well but not as heavy as the S&B. Zero stops on both are a good hard stop. S&B image looks warmer and shows browns better, NF looks colder and shows the blues in images better...both are still great images.

If I had to pick one it would be the S&B but again...I have nothing against the NF and wouldnt blink if NF was the only option.

Pick the one that has the reticle you want and go from there.

EDIT: noticed you said "every other brand" Id hands down take either over a vortex, bushnell, burris, etc. I havent tried a TT but the Premier I owned was the NF and S&B equal so I'm sure its up there also. I own a vortex razor g2 and am looking to replace it with another S&B or NF. The Razor is a good optic but its not an S&B or NF. Their warranty is great, but I prefer one I dont have to use.
 
I have owned and shot both. They are both tough scopes but my opinion only the Schmidt feels better built and I was able to see targets better at longer distances. Once again this is subjective. The NF is also a great scope and I did not have any issues with it either. Determine your use and see what features work for you. A good example are the turrets do you want locking or not do you want the turrets to have a feel when you hit every mil? Also what are the reticle options that you prefer. I am by no means a professional shooter but have had sometime behind each scope. In the end you can’t go wrong with either. Good luck.
Thank you for the reply, I’m putting the scope on a custom AR10/lr308. It’s mostly a hunting gun, so I’d like sfp As for me most ffp Are to hard to see in the timber on low magnification. I’d also like to get into competitive shooting at some point as well. I wanted low end for fast acquisition in hunting situations and higher end magnification for shooting distance. So I was looking at the s&b 3-20 ultra short and the nx8 2.5-20 which I was hoping at some point would have a sfp option. It hasn’t , I looked at Zeiss v8 2.8-20 and the swaro 3-24 z8i. Neither really fit the bill, either I didn’t like one or the other didn’t have enough adjustment. I’m pretty sure I’m going with the Schmidt as it has everything I want, but the warranty (or lack there of) Gave me pause just a bit, and NF customer service is amazing so I figure I’d ask people with more knowledge than me. Thank you for the reply it is exactly what I was looking for and it really helps.
 
Now you have actually provided the scopes to compare. Neither one of those two scopes has enough time in service to make a meaningful guess regarding durability. Total crap shoot on both, other than reputation of company. Both are bad representations of the overall quality of the company behind them. Lose the need for 20x and get an older 3-12 SB. A p3 reticle will work fine on low power...and have zero resale so you can get a used scope very cheap. Most tested optic in existence and proper for your application.
 
Last edited:
whoops. I went cross eyed and missed it.
And to answer your question, pretty much anything to do with science. Sorry I don’t log individuals making bad science post but maybe I should.

View attachment 7241085

Wow cool, now go back and read post 5 and 6.

Where do they talk about Snipershide science discussions?
 
Last edited:
I’ve had both, got rid of the ATACR and I prefer my PMII. I have smashed it into things, it has fallen over while leaned up against things and landed on the scope, banged into rocks and barricades, It has been covered in gritty mud and had the turrets turned while filthy, strapped tight to packs and taken countless trips to the deck when a ruck is done and the pack is dropped, you name it. Still holds zero and tracks perfectly. I’m not careless with my rifles, but I don’t pamper them. They are tools and I expect them to handle heavy use without having to waste time worrying about being delicate to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dspjaggar and 03CR
I have been using both for years (Schmidt Bender on my Precision guns and NF on ARs) and am not gentle with my stuff; never had any issues.
 
The zero Kelvin bit was hillarious.

All riflescope companies have service departments that are quite busy.

Both Nightforce and S&B make reliable scopes as do most other competing brands: Tangent Theta, March, Minox, Kahles, etc.

The fact that a particular scope was adopted by the military usually does not have a ton to do with toughness of the design, perceived and otherwise.

Many scope companies use various stunts to show off how ell built their scopes are, but those are mostly good for publicity. They do not really demonstrate anything useful.

I have some insight into how different companies do their lifecycle testing and they are all quite diligent about testing stuff. Tangent Theta probably does the crazyest amount of lifecycle testing overall (something about their scopes functioning in really cold Arctic conditions among other things), but I do not know what all companies do.

I recall a few years back the guys at Kelbly's took a couple of March scopes, mounted them backwards on a 50 cal and fired a few shots. Nothing broke, which I thought was impressive.

ILya
 
S&B has Schott glass and 7075 aluminum tubes. NF has Japanese glass and 6061 aluminum. Everyone knows Schott glass and 7075 aluminum is tougher. Ever see that pic of a NF scope with a bullet hole in it? Well that’s nothing to be proud of.
 
The zero Kelvin bit was hillarious.

All riflescope companies have service departments that are quite busy.

Both Nightforce and S&B make reliable scopes as do most other competing brands: Tangent Theta, March, Minox, Kahles, etc.

The fact that a particular scope was adopted by the military usually does not have a ton to do with toughness of the design, perceived and otherwise.

Many scope companies use various stunts to show off how ell built their scopes are, but those are mostly good for publicity. They do not really demonstrate anything useful.

I have some insight into how different companies do their lifecycle testing and they are all quite diligent about testing stuff. Tangent Theta probably does the crazyest amount of lifecycle testing overall (something about their scopes functioning in really cold Arctic conditions among other things), but I do not know what all companies do.

I recall a few years back the guys at Kelbly's took a couple of March scopes, mounted them backwards on a 50 cal and fired a few shots. Nothing broke, which I thought was impressive.

ILya

I had a conversation with Andrew Weber (pretty sure) of TT where he mentioned cycling their adjustments through 10k revolutions. Not sure if that was the full elevation travel or actual revs, but it shows their dedication. It's nice to see companies who are that committed to quality.

In general, I hope all of these top-tier companies put out well-built, thoroughly QC'd products. I've put all my eggs in the NF basket, and haven't been disappointed.
 
If this was said in old SH



View attachment 7241154

It was very close there. I was thinking no way this is serious? I had to read it a few times and make a judgement call.

@koshkin Isn’t S&B one of the few companies not using Schott glass? I was under the impression that S&B still owned and operated Hungarian Optical Works for their own internal glass manufacturing versus procuring from Schott AG.
 
Last edited:
It was very close there. I was thinking no way this is serious? I had to read it a few times and make a judgement call.

@koshkin Isn’t S&B one of the few companies not using Schott glass? I was under the impression that S&B still owned and operated Hungarian Optical Works for their own internal glass manufacturing versus procuring from Schott AG.

They do own the facility in Hungary. I do not know whether they do their own glass melts or grind and polish lenses there. I do know they assemble some stuff there. I'd be surprised if they made raw glass there, but anything is possible. Generally, raw glass production is different skill set that lens making.

ILya
 
Hi,

So now I am confused......
Is the OP "Looking" to purchase or "Looking" for confirmation of his purchase???

Sincerely,
Theis

Ended up with a Schmidt 3-20 ultra short in sfp . Best combo of reliable, glass, tough, feature, tracking etc. the swaro has the best glass imo but only had 47 moa of adjustment. the Zeiss glass to me was yellow, and I didn’t like the 36mm tube, or the reticle. as well the image imo degraded when zoomed. The nf I don’t think was a bad scope, decent glass for the money, decent turrets for the money. however without a sfp option the reticle was far too small. (which is why Imo I think many people feel they have a eyebox problem all the way through the power range and not just at high power, and that would explain why the problem doesn’t impact the 4-32 nf nearly as bad. but that is just supposition I’m not an glass engineer) Nf had the best warranty but I’ve been assured Schmidt takes a beating and they take care of customers even with the 30 year warranty which I was told bey europtic was only 30 years because German law doesn’t allow longer ?‍♂️. Either way they are built like tanks so I’m not too worried. I’m putting it on NF 20 moa 194a ultralight mount
 
I have utilized most major and some not so major scope brands since the 1960’s.

I presently utilize only two brands of scopes. S&B and NF. Likely have 25 or more of them but only a few see hard use.

5-20 S&B and NF 2.5-10x24.
I use them daily, year around. None have gone back for repairs in 5-20 years of use.

You should find the features you need and pick that scope. Unless you have very poor luck durability should not be a concern with either make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sethwilliamd
Hi,

So now I am confused......
Is the OP "Looking" to purchase or "Looking" for confirmation of his purchase???

Sincerely,
Theis
3-20 s&b ultra short Is on order, and not yet recieved, yes to both? I’m willing to cancel Or change orders if I hear of major problems, but if the above comments are an indicator that likely isn’t going to happen. Sounds like I ordered a tough reliable scope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RTH1800
I had a 3-20 ultra short. Great scope but moved it on due to being longer than the 5-20. I wanted compact and no personal need for 3 power. The 5-20 is 1” to 1.5” shorter IIRC.
 
The versions of scopes the Military recives may be tougher but are typically not serviceable very easy since many parts internally are not made to be replaced.