Sig Blaser and DTA SRS similarities

[beenjammin]

For anyone that has fired or has knowledge of both systems. Its sounds like the SRs uses a similar system tot he blaser design in that the barrel/extension locks into a sotck with two(sig) or four(SRS) bolts. The bolt then locks directly into the barrel extension meaning no receiver to mate the two. IF this thinking is correct I am much mroe inetrested in the SRS as the blasers I have fired were all lights out accurate. The only difference I see is that the blaser scope mounts directly to the barrel where the SRS mounts to the stock. Would this allow for loss of any repeatability when chaning and reinstalling barrels? i know it would be minimal if any at all.

 

[patches]

Re: Sig Blaser and DTA SRS similarities

Well, where do we start.

Each barrel conversion will have a different POI, but it is repeatable when switching back to a caliber. My 338 conversion shoots 1.5" to the right and 1" higher than my 308 conversion.

The barrel extension on a SRS is basically the area where the lugs lock(about 1.75" long). The barrel (chamber area) is actually the part that is clamped in the chassis.

The scope is indeed mounted to the chassis which houses the action.

The SRS is a bull pup.

 

[beenjammin]

Re: Sig Blaser and DTA SRS similarities

When i say similarities, i should have refered it only to the bolt into barrel.