I'm looking to get a 8-32X56 Sightron for F-TR and general practice at groups and dot drills. I'd prefer to get a Mil-Dot reticle but am wary of thickness. I'm totally confused by the dimensions of the reticles of the Mil-Dot reticles between the scopes with MIL adjustments and those with MOA. The CM adjustment (.1MIL actually) measure the reticle thickness at .2 inches at maximum magnification (that seems very thick at 32x for a SFP scope). But the scope with the Mil-Dot reticle with MOA adjustments measure at .07
What gives? Why can't the MD/CM have the same level of fine reticle as the MOA adjustment scope?
Here are the reticle specs:
Sightron <span style="font-weight: bold">8-32X56LRMD/<span style="color: #FF0000">CM </span></span>
Min Power
A 108
B 10.8
C 3.6
D 2.4
<span style="color: #FF0000">E.6</span>
Max Power
A 36
B 3.6
C 1.2
D .79
<span style="color: #FF0000">E.2</span>
Compared to:
Sightron<span style="font-weight: bold"> 8-32X56LRMD/<span style="color: #FF0000">MOA</span></span> (1/4MOA)
Min Power
A 106.3
B 10.63
C 3.38
D 2.25
<span style="color: #FF0000">E .28</span>
MAx Power
A 26.6
B 2.66
C .84
D .56
<span style="color: #FF0000">E .07</span>
What gives? Why can't the MD/CM have the same level of fine reticle as the MOA adjustment scope?
Here are the reticle specs:
Sightron <span style="font-weight: bold">8-32X56LRMD/<span style="color: #FF0000">CM </span></span>

Min Power
A 108
B 10.8
C 3.6
D 2.4
<span style="color: #FF0000">E.6</span>
Max Power
A 36
B 3.6
C 1.2
D .79
<span style="color: #FF0000">E.2</span>
Compared to:
Sightron<span style="font-weight: bold"> 8-32X56LRMD/<span style="color: #FF0000">MOA</span></span> (1/4MOA)

Min Power
A 106.3
B 10.63
C 3.38
D 2.25
<span style="color: #FF0000">E .28</span>
MAx Power
A 26.6
B 2.66
C .84
D .56
<span style="color: #FF0000">E .07</span>