Re: Sightron SII Big Sky compared to SIII
I have a couple SIII's and SII's, as well as a few Big Sky models. Guess you could say I am a bit of a Sightron fan, but I have yet to find better optics for the money. I run an SIII 3.5-10x44 mil dot on an SPR build, as well as an SIII 6-24x50 mil dot on a 24" bull barrel AR. I have a 3-12x42 SII Big Sky on a 16" build, with the HHR reticle, and run other SII's on various deer and varmint rifles.
The glass on the SII Big Sky models is very good, and compares with Leupold VX-3s, Elite 4200s, Zeiss Conquests, etc. Now, compared with the SIII, there is a slight bit of difference. The glass on the SIII's is outstanding, and compare with anything under $1k. Would I call it a significant difference? Probably not, but the SIIIs give you 30mm tubes, larger turrets, and more internal adjustment.
Now, as far as which I would suggest for the LTR, it really depends on the type of shooting you plan on doing. I would simply say "go with the SIII", except they don't offer a 4.5-14 or similar power model. All they offer is a 3.5-10x44 and 6-24x50 in mil dot variables for the SIII, which is something I hope they change in the near future. I think you would be very happy with the 4.5-14 Big Sky model, as the glass will be excellent and will have repeatable turrets. Plus, Sightron offers some of the best customer service in the industry, and I can guarantee you that they will quickly fix any problem you may encounter.
Emmagee, I sent you an IM...