• Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    Drop it in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!

    Join the contest

Signs of high pressure?

eightshot627

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Jan 29, 2009
13
0
Thurmont, MD
Signs of high pressure?

Firearm: DPMS LR-308, factory 24 inch bull barrel 1:10 twist
Load: 44 grains Varget, 175grain SMK, full length resized and trimmed once fired Remington case, CCI BR2 primer, 2.8 COAL.

After firing some of the surplus stuff for fouling shots and warm up I loaded up 5 to shoot for a group of the above handload. The first shot locked the bolt back, the extractor ripped the rim and the primer was flat with the exception of primer flow. Since I didn’t bring the cleaning rod it was the only shot fired. The case took no effort to remove it from the chamber with the rod. After looking at the case it looked like an over pressure situation. The load is below max and all over the hide and other websites people are shooting 45 grains of Varget and a 175. I checked my digital scale with a 45grain Sierra and it weighed 44.9 grains. My powder measure was still setup and had been throwing 43.9 and 44.0 charges in the thirty I loaded weighing every charge for development. I threw a charge and it weighed 44.0 grains. I made sure the scale was level and then calibrated the scale. After the calibration the charge weighed 44.0. To double check I got out old reliable, the Lyman M-5 balance beam scale and the charge and weighed 44.0.

So now what? Where do I go now? I never had a problem staying in published data before. Go down to 42.0 and work up in 0.5 grain increments until?

Thanks,
Walt
attachment.php
 
Re: Signs of high pressure?

I had an Eagle Arms AR-10T, if memory serves me correct it only like around 43 or 43.5gr of Varget with a 175SMK. My Sabreco/Szablewski .308 upper with a 1:12 Kreiger can actually handle more than 45gr of Varget but I just load with 45gr. Your issue is probably due to a number of things.
1. Gas port pressure- standard port location results in higher pressures, mine is 1.8" farther forward. You can fix this by trying a adjustable gas block.

2. Barrel twist- my upper is a 1:12 with the slower twist pressure is lower

3. Try the tubbs CWS it will increase your bolt mass and keep the bolt lock time greater.

Not saying any of the above will work for sure but just my thoughts.
 
Re: Signs of high pressure?

I shoot 44.0 grains of Varget with 168 gr SMK in my rifle which is the same as yours. I have done anything to the upper but shoot it. The only issue I have is I get free FGM brass and its a little soft. The extracter leaves slight marks on the brass but after firing some factory FGMM ammo it did the same to them. The few Hornady and Winchester brass I have used worked much better with no marks left on the head of the brass.

Oh I also use the same COAL and I have very good results with the 168 A-max as well. Both rounds shoot under 1/2 MOA in my LR and my 700P
 
Re: Signs of high pressure?

As some have indicated above, the problem isn't high pressure, but the pressure is too high in the chamber at the time the gas system is trying to cycle your bolt.

Best solution is to back down the charge a bit.
 
Re: Signs of high pressure?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: rcamuglia</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is it possible that you loaded the shells too long with the bullet jammed into the lands?

Check MCOAL with that bullet. </div></div>

The COAL is 2.8 to fit the mag and is standard for .308s. They drop right into the chamber and don’t get near the lands. The Sierra manual lists 2.8 as the COAL.

I think this just goes to prove proper load development is the way to go. No skipping steps. This is why all the books have disclaimers and just because it’s in the book doesn’t mean it works.

What I learned:
1. Proper load development.
2. Gas guns are different.
3. See #1.

Thanks,
Walt
 
Re: Signs of high pressure?

Pressure signs are not strictly related to propellant charge rates. As one responder says his 260 load and his friends are vastly different that I will try to explain below but first we will look at size die and chamber dimensions.


Stuck cases can be the result of two more things not mentioned by others. One is your size die may not be sizing your case down on the base dimension enough and you are getting an interference fit when it is chambered. Measure your fired case .200” up from rim with micrometer and then measure your unfired cases at same point. I run tight chambers all the time so I know what to expect but brass fired in another rifle and then in a new rifle that is not sized properly can give you as stuck case with no pressure. What happens is the case say snug up when bolt hits forward end of travel and when you push bolt knob down you get a fairly substantial mechanical advantage as it cams in and you have then force it it and since the case and the chamber is tapered you get a lock up condition from hell in some instances.

I have seen guys shut bolt and when they went to open it they had to beat the bolt up and not even have fired the round ! ! ! !


Also check your fired case to see if it is egg shaped as such will cause a tight case extraction. Egg shaped chambers are not that uncommon and the fact that the extractor holds the case off center in a big chamber only makes it worse.

Assuming it is not a die problem or you have cases fired in an oversized chamber then you most likely have a barrel internal dimension problem.


Unless you know what the land and groove dimensions are you are just spinning your wheels. This is why the manuals say start low and work up. There is no requirements as to barrel dimensions for the various barrel manufacturers we get barrels from.

There are recommendations but insofar as a requirement that barrels meet specific tolerance ranges, it is pure chance the same load will give similar performance in different barrels.

Lets say you have a 30 cal barrel and the min bore diameter is supposed to be .300X.308. I have seen 30 cal barrels run .298x.3055 to .301x309. Bullet fit in barrels is not readiy apparent unless you have a good, make that a very good bore scope.

I have examined barrels that have the bullet contacting the middle of the groove and half the diameter of the groove all the way to the muzzle. On the other end of the spectrum is I have seen barrels that show little bullet contact with bore and not even at that. Obviously if you have a load that gives you normal fired case dimensions at .300X.308 then if you have a barrel that is .299 or .298 min with a max of .307, .306, or less you are going to have a interference fit which will raise the pressures tremendously.

Barrels on the loose size you may or may not notice lower pressure as just looking at the primer is not conclusive proof of pressure.

For instance most every knows that a cratered primer means high pressure and what appears to be reverse primer flow can be achieved by high pressure as well as a tired firing pin (striker) spring that does not have enough energy to hold the primer in during the pressure curve rise and fall and thusly there is a condition where the primer wants to crawl up inside the bolt face.

This is not to say manufacturers’ A, B, and C are all different. Only the gov’t contracts have callouts for land and groove dimensions and they are checked at first article acceptance upon delivery to determine if they meet or fail the drawing requirements. When we as individuals get a barrel we don't have the means to determine exactly what we have unpacked.

I once chambered two barrels from the same manufacturer received in the same shipment and chambered with the same reamer on the same day. I headspaced both to snug closed on a GO GAGE and I ran erosion gage in the bores to record their zero round location with the same erosion gage.
The difference was 1 ½ rings more on one barrel than the other! ! ! ! ! ! ! That means the erosion gage went further into the barrel by .150” which can only happen when one barrel is larger diameter internally than the other assuming both are new.


As well I got several barrels from another manufacturer maybe eight years ago. I chambered one up and I shot it and it never really shot well. I got a very nice Olympus bore scope and finally last year ran it down the barrel and I immediatley knew why it does not shoot well.

It is a buttoned barrel and apparently it was not reamed after it was drilled. It could not be seen without the bore scope but the inspection revealed gobs of steel build up on top of the lands that just ripped hunks of bullet jacket off as it went by. Without a doubt the worst barrel I have ever seen.

But without the bore scope it looks just fine. I have another one I greased up when I got it and I am dreading running the scope down it. Or as I tell some it looks like it was rifled with a mill bastard file and a brick! ! ! !


But this is what you deal with when you buy single barrels from vendors and their QA is not real good.
Bottom line is back off your load every time you change barrels.
If you want to see how changes happen during barrel life load up 100 rounds and at new shoot 20 continuous rounds through a chronograph at same temperature. The remaining 80 rounds would be stored in a ammo can and fired at 1000 round intervals which will take you to 5000 rounds.

You will be amazed at just how much velocity you lose. With a medium case you probably won’t see much velocity change up to the 3000 round test point but at 4000 and 5000 I suspect you will see maybe 75 to 90 FPS velocity deterioration.

The rule of thumb on gov't barrels is a loss of velocity of 200 fps or more and a 150% increase in dispersion based on acceptance specs. For instance the M16 series of weapons have a requirement that they print 4.5" or less at 100 yards for ten shots. Conversely when a barrel exceeds 7.2" for a ten shot group is is considered to have failed.

Doesn't that give you a real good feeling to know the gov't will accept a battle rifle that will barely print a E silhouette at 300 yards/meters?

Kind of makes me want to puke.
 
Re: Signs of high pressure?

I necked some LC 308 brass down to 260.

One of the cases had the primer pocket increase in inside diameter .015" ~ .020".
And yes, the primer always falls out when the primer pocket grows that much.

That is the kind of pressure spike one would get from going 5 or 10 grains over published max loads.

I think a bullet got pinched by a thick necked case.
 
Re: Signs of high pressure?

LC cases have much thicker necks than do commercial cases and need to be trimmed (thinned) for every caliber below 308. Mic your loaded rounds and compare them to a SAAMI 260 chamber drawing so you will know where you are.

LC Match cases allow for a .005" neck wall variation as well thusly it is a problem waiting to happen when they are sized down without outside neck turning.

If you have a factory barrel you are at a disadvantage because to measure the neck you will need to cast the chamber.

There is another method. Before you size case see if a new bullet will drop freely in and out of the case mouth. If it won't you are on in the IFFY area as case necks expand and contract a couple thou on firing. Thusly if the contracted case mouth is smaller than the bullet you are in the danger area.

There are bench shooters whose neck dimensions are about .001" larger their loaded rounds and their turned necks will contract back and allow a bullet to be soft seated without sizing it but these generally can be moved with fingers. If they are too tight to move you have a restriction problem for sure.

LC cases can be reloaded a minimum of 75 times if you have a tighter than SAAMI base dimension (measured .200" up from rim).
SAAMI will be about .4705-.473 range and fired cases will show .471 range.

My tight chambers are .468-.469 on base. LC Cases are .468 on base unfired thusly my fired cases appear to be unfired (looking at base area only) when they come out of the chamber and thusly last many reloadings. Now commercial 308 cases I have measured new and unfired are much smaller on the base dimension and are .465 for the Rem, Win, Fed new unfired ammo/cases I have measured.

This is why on commercial brass you see the bulge at the bases as they have expanded .006 to .008 on firing. 308 dies generally resize bases to .468/.469 so you retain case swell.

I prefer LC cases for this reason, they don't expand visably in my chambers thusly the brass does not get lots of rework each time.

I once had a similar experience of enlarged primer pocket when I wanted to reproof a 1917 Enfield that had been in a fire. I pulled by Frankford Arsenal Handbook that gave the basic loadings for all ammo which called for 4198 propellent and a 173 grain bullet. I tied the barrel action to a frame, hooked a lanyard to it and got behind 3/4" plywood about twenty feet to the rear and pulled it.

When I looked over the plywood I saw smoke hanging around the action. I beat the bolt open and the primer pocket looked like I could have taken a primer from a 50 cal BMG round and seated it in the 30.06 case.

Getting the case out was interesting as it had siezed. I took the case to the ammo boys and told them I thought their data might be wrong. They pulled the drawing for 30.06 proof round and it called for 173 bullet but 4895 propellant and not 4198 so the FA ammo handbook had a missprint. The ammo boys said the case had seen about 90 to 95,000 lbs.