So I just got a new digital scale today, along with a box of 175g SMK's to try out (always used 168g AMAX prior). Decided to do a "quality control" test on bullets.
Some facts
-Scale was RCBS Charge master 1500 in case anyone is curious.
-Randomly (approx every 5-10 bullets) checked calibration with included weights. (every time it was checked it was accurate)
-I intermittedly switched between AMAX and SMK. (would weigh one AMAX then a bunch of SMK than an AMAX) to keep as impartial as possible.
I only had (5) 168g AMAX's left, the weights ranged from a low of 167.2g to a high of 167.9g. (Actual weights 167.2, .7, .8, .8, .9. (the 167.2 was checked 3x)
Out of (100) 175g SMK's, there was not a single one that was > +/- 0.1g. (All ranging from 174.9 - 175.1)
I am not saying that the AMAX is a bad round, it has shot extremely well in my rifle for the approx. year I've been reloading them. Have not gotten a chance to test out the SMK round yet.
Has anyone else done tests? Possibly with similar results? Or results to contradict mine?
Some facts
-Scale was RCBS Charge master 1500 in case anyone is curious.
-Randomly (approx every 5-10 bullets) checked calibration with included weights. (every time it was checked it was accurate)
-I intermittedly switched between AMAX and SMK. (would weigh one AMAX then a bunch of SMK than an AMAX) to keep as impartial as possible.
I only had (5) 168g AMAX's left, the weights ranged from a low of 167.2g to a high of 167.9g. (Actual weights 167.2, .7, .8, .8, .9. (the 167.2 was checked 3x)
Out of (100) 175g SMK's, there was not a single one that was > +/- 0.1g. (All ranging from 174.9 - 175.1)
I am not saying that the AMAX is a bad round, it has shot extremely well in my rifle for the approx. year I've been reloading them. Have not gotten a chance to test out the SMK round yet.
Has anyone else done tests? Possibly with similar results? Or results to contradict mine?