So Harry Reid was busy trying to get some money for supposed injuries, but apparently destroying the evidence is not a good first start:
www.dailymail.co.uk
"Jurors never saw the actual device because Reid's adult son, attorney Leif Reid, disposed of it soon after Harry Reid was injured."
Also when you have to ask the jurors to decide if you are lying now, or were just lying to your constituents it gets not good for you:
"Reid testified last week his injuries were 'the main factor' why he decided not to seek a sixth Senate term in 2016. Quiat, however, showed the jury a 2015 video news release in which Reid said his decision not to run had 'absolutely nothing to do with my injury.'"

Jury rejects Harry Reid lawsuit against fitness band maker
After eight days of testimony, the eight-member civil trial jury deliberated about an hour before declaring that Reid never proved the first of 10 questions they were asked to decide.
"Jurors never saw the actual device because Reid's adult son, attorney Leif Reid, disposed of it soon after Harry Reid was injured."
Also when you have to ask the jurors to decide if you are lying now, or were just lying to your constituents it gets not good for you:
"Reid testified last week his injuries were 'the main factor' why he decided not to seek a sixth Senate term in 2016. Quiat, however, showed the jury a 2015 video news release in which Reid said his decision not to run had 'absolutely nothing to do with my injury.'"