So much for Trump being "Pro Gun"
- Thread starter jljr23
- Start date
Pretty much. Avi is back, and they went away about the same time. But it was Bang Bang's second strike.
Here we go again...
Crack babies gonna crack head, you know?
Too bad victims always take payoffs instead of vengeance
Hmmmm, wasn't the FBI responsible for Ruby Ridge?
And being proud of how Waco was handled by the feds seems a little misguided.
But I know "that would never happen in today's FBI"
Junior was there last year. I personally seen him. Didn’t care enough to go meet him tho.
Good evening James. How’s the book deals going? You going to be at Hilary’s this weekend?
Let’s get something going for real. Who wants to be pointman. Going to need a lot of peeps tho. Have to get clubs involved to get those numbers.
Will need a lawyer and cash to get point man out, hopefully a member is a lawyer.
Enevatably at least a handfull of arrests will be made by the chicken shits in dc.
With enough participation the fee's shouldn't hurt anyone.
Ha! The Peshmerga like to be triggered. It gives them something to do, other than eat, fuck and smoke hashish (and I mean that in a good way).
The NRA was hounding me for donations just minutes ago, told them to do
something about this crap to gain credibility or forget it.
something about this crap to gain credibility or forget it.
I got one with a pic of ollie norh, wrote a letter telling his pussy ass to go fuck himself.
Not to jump on the NRA hate thing *but* I got my concealed carry in Illinois and it was spendy but worth it....I carry all the time/everywhere and train like a bandit. Then I got hooked on the precision rifle thing and joined the local rifle club which requires membership in the NRA as a prerequisite to club membership. So, I did it.
Then I find out that the private rifle club is anti concealed carry - no loaded weapons, concealed or open carried, to be carried to/from the firing line. The rule is: no concealed carry on an NRA Only private club property. What. The. Fuck. But if I wanna shoot long range and not drive 3 hours then I have to disarm before I leave my car when going to the rifle range. I had words with the club secretary and he don't care. Wrote a letter to the NRA telling them that I can't believe they sanction an NRA Only club that refuses concealed carry to licensed members and They.Don't. Care.
The NRA is about *Money* and *Control* and I don't believe the leadership gives a fuck about concealed carry rights. Just keep sending in the money, Gun Buddies, and it'll all be fine.
Not impressed with the Fudd Rifle Club I joined nor the NFRA...National Fudd Rifle Association. I just wanna shoot. We are on our own for Gun Rights.
VooDoo
Then I find out that the private rifle club is anti concealed carry - no loaded weapons, concealed or open carried, to be carried to/from the firing line. The rule is: no concealed carry on an NRA Only private club property. What. The. Fuck. But if I wanna shoot long range and not drive 3 hours then I have to disarm before I leave my car when going to the rifle range. I had words with the club secretary and he don't care. Wrote a letter to the NRA telling them that I can't believe they sanction an NRA Only club that refuses concealed carry to licensed members and They.Don't. Care.
The NRA is about *Money* and *Control* and I don't believe the leadership gives a fuck about concealed carry rights. Just keep sending in the money, Gun Buddies, and it'll all be fine.
Not impressed with the Fudd Rifle Club I joined nor the NFRA...National Fudd Rifle Association. I just wanna shoot. We are on our own for Gun Rights.
VooDoo
Not comfortable blasting the name out in public for not needing the potential fall out....It's the only place local to shoot long range and if I wanna play (and I do) I'll have to tolerate and abide by the rules. But I find it to be blatantly hypocritical for an NRA only club to be anti concealed carry. There are signs everywhere - on every range forbidding concealed carry.
I assume it is because of insurance regulations.
VooDoo
I assume it is because of insurance regulations.
VooDoo
Out of sight - out of mind. What they don't know won't hurt them. When they start using metal detectors at your local gun club then it's time to leave.
At my local gun club, there was some bozo that proposed a rule to keep ALL concealed firearms off the club property. He was promptly embarrassed and didn't have much to say after that.
Or how about when the FBI went after Dr. Martin Luther King? The FBI has been used as a political tool in the past and to think they aren’t capable of such things is just naive. The idea that the FBI is politically unbiased is just silly. How Clinton was treated by the FBI during the investigation into mishandling classified information was completely incompetent at best and criminal at worst. Anyone else would have gone to jail for what she did.
I can and do open carry at stores, burger joints, one liquor store that is near my sons house.
Some others are posted no open carry, my bank for one, any that are posted no carry I dont spend any of my money at if at all posible to go elsewhere.
Holstered sidearms should not be excluded on ranges by insurance concerns.
Gun safety rules should be modified to exempt carry guns, they are at some other
ranges I shoot at, they remain holstered unless you use them for practice
and then become subject to standard range rules with the exception of
reloading and holstering for exit.
I think license holders should have that right and responsibility if acting in a safe manner.
Especially if you are a member and in some casses your ltc is used in membership
Requirements.
I understand this conflicts with established range procedures but don't like being disarmed
by anyone, ever! Pretty much a direct threat.
I don't respond well to threats.
Some others are posted no open carry, my bank for one, any that are posted no carry I dont spend any of my money at if at all posible to go elsewhere.
Holstered sidearms should not be excluded on ranges by insurance concerns.
Gun safety rules should be modified to exempt carry guns, they are at some other
ranges I shoot at, they remain holstered unless you use them for practice
and then become subject to standard range rules with the exception of
reloading and holstering for exit.
I think license holders should have that right and responsibility if acting in a safe manner.
Especially if you are a member and in some casses your ltc is used in membership
Requirements.
I understand this conflicts with established range procedures but don't like being disarmed
by anyone, ever! Pretty much a direct threat.
I don't respond well to threats.
Bumps stock are for fags. If you are going to federal prison why not go for having the real thing?
Only morons and the weak minded deal in absolutes. To preclude the possibility of there ever being a "but" is ignorant at best.
Lifetime NRA member, and even they fuck things up from time to time.
This. The democrats are being more and more open about wanting socialism. While it sounds good on paper, socialism can only be enforced under tyrannical government rule. Putting a nice pink ribbon on it doesn’t change that.
If Vegas never happened nobody would know bumpstocks even existed outside the gun community. Hell half of them don't even know or have ever even seen one.
I'd say more like 80% of the gun community have never even seen a bump stock, let alone own one.
Outside the gun community, no one knew what a bump stock was, most still don't.
Probably the most insignificant piece of legislation ever passed "affecting" the gun community of all time.
You would have thought by the retard reaction that they just banned all rifles
Not insignificant.
Sets a precedent for requiring someone to destroy/surrender what was lawfully owned and obtained property or become a felon.
If you dont think that significant well.....
Are you Ollie North coming here to stick up for the NRA treachery? Just stop, you sound like a Jew in 1938 explaining to his family why its good to go to the work camps where they will be taken care of , put to work and treated well, for their own protection.
QUOTE="SuckitTrebek, post: 7415627, member: 6510"]I'd say more like 80% of the gun community have never even seen a bump stock, let alone own one.
Outside the gun community, no one knew what a bump stock was, most still don't.
Probably the most insignificant piece of legislation ever passed "affecting" the gun community of all time.
You would have thought by the retard reaction that they just banned all rifles[/QUOTE]
QUOTE="SuckitTrebek, post: 7415627, member: 6510"]I'd say more like 80% of the gun community have never even seen a bump stock, let alone own one.
Outside the gun community, no one knew what a bump stock was, most still don't.
Probably the most insignificant piece of legislation ever passed "affecting" the gun community of all time.
You would have thought by the retard reaction that they just banned all rifles[/QUOTE]
yes it fucking is on many levels. Its unconstitutional firstly and that is all that should matter.
I beg to differ with you. The rule banning bump stocks was not "legislation." It was never a bill that was introduced and passed by both houses of the legislature or signed into law by the POTUS.
It was a rule change made by an administrative arm of the Executive branch of the government.
So you are good with unconstitutional shit as long as it gets repeated.
Dont recall entirely the dumb Colorado shit. was there no "grand fathering"?
Everything owned prior to the date of the law passing is grandfathered in CO. Totally different than the new bumpstock ban.
As an aside, more than half the sheriffs in CO publicly stated that they would be instructing their deputies to not bother enforcing the law.
Something else that a lot of people are also overlooking:
Article 1, Section 9 and 10 of the Constitution, prohibit the Federal legislature and States from enacting an ex-post-facto law.
Albeit can be argued that the regulation was changed. However, the criminal penalties are stiff enough that I would make one of my arguments based on ex-post-facto if I were bringing the lawsuit.
Article 1, Section 9 and 10 of the Constitution, prohibit the Federal legislature and States from enacting an ex-post-facto law.
Albeit can be argued that the regulation was changed. However, the criminal penalties are stiff enough that I would make one of my arguments based on ex-post-facto if I were bringing the lawsuit.
But these fucking criminal officials do it all the time, with the amen corner in robes giving the go ahead, the whole government is criminal. The end is neigh gents.
What’s worse is that it is a poor interpretation of a regulation. The executive branch is getting way too much power lately. It’s not ok.
Similar threads
