Precision Rifle Gear Spuhr vs M Brace question please

[LC 6.5 Shooter]

Does anyone know if the m brace will let the scope go back further. I bought a zco with a spuhr and to get good eye relief I had to put scope all the way back in the spuhr and on the very back picatinny slot. Then I had to take a length of pull spacer out. Even with that i have to crawl on top of the rifle to get good eye relief. Seeing if other mounts give a little more flexibility. Id like to put spacer back in and not have to climb on top of the rifle. Im not comfortable on the rifle at all. TIA

 

[Zak Smith]

It is probably tighter around the turrets but the base is shorter front to back

 

[SniperBro]

The answer is no. The M-Brace has almost the exact same distance between rings as a standard Spuhr 6001. The rear ring is in almost exactly the same place on both mounts when mounted as far back as possible. The only fix might be a different model Spuhr?

 

[SniperBro]

It is probably tighter around the turrets but the base is shorter front to back

The base is shorter, but when analyzing the possible mountability, the M-brace still cannot get any further back than the typical Spuhr, at least the 6001.

 

[LC 6.5 Shooter]

I see the problem. I have a 6016 so the back ring is not flush with the bottom mount. A 6001 or the m brace would definitely fix my problem

 

[LC 6.5 Shooter]

Damn cantilever

 

[Zak Smith]

The base is shorter, but when analyzing the possible mountability, the M-brace still cannot get any further back than the typical Spuhr, at least the 6001.

Good point. Most of my Spuhrs are longer.

Maybe a cantilevered, 0-MOA Spuhr-- and run it backwards