Most of what you said is subjective.
Better glass? probably, but not by much.
Better reticle? Not in my opinion, because reticles are subjective.
Better turrets? Again, subjective.
Better zero stop? I like both.
Better mag range? Yes, but 3.5-21 is sufficient.
Better eye box? maybe
Better parallax? define better, they both remove parallax.
Better illumination? How so? They both illuminate, illumination is not typically used in the day time.
Better warranty/CS? Maybe. Bushnell's warranty is pretty damn good, and it is unlikely to be needed for the Tactical series.
Yes, Vortex has very good warranty, good thing, as it is used frequently.
Its not subjective its fact.
It does have better glass. Better resolution, better color accuracy and less CA.
It does have a better Reticle. The EBR7C is better than the G3. Finer detail , floating dot ect.
The Turrets are absolutely better. Its not even subjective anyone who has run both will tell you what I just did.
Sufficient for what? Shooting small groups on paper and then taking out to a mile? You will get better PID and detection assuming mirage and atmospherics are not working against you.
The eyebox IS better. Get behind both.
The Paralax is not only more accurate for the given range, its easier to adjust.
Bushenlls warranty doesn't hold a candle to vortex. They are slower, will charge you shipping half the time and if its not something they deem a manufacturing defect, you will pay for it. I have fucked up a couple of bushels due to me trying to break them and while they did warranty them, I had to pay for the repair, shipping and a long wait time. Had I done the same with a razor, it would have been no questions asked replaced within a week and zero cost to me.
Having owned a bunch of Bushy ET and Razor optics I can tell you the razors have less issues and need warranty work much less. Not to say Bushnell makes a bad scope, in fact they make a very capable if dated optic. They really haven't innovated or updated much since the HDMR other than a little better glass and zero stop turrets. Same clunky design going on 10 years.
It sounds like you really don't know much about optics considering you fail to identify the nuance between them. If you can differentiate the minutia and finer details, you have nothing to add to this thread.
Comparing a DM2 to a razor is pants on the head retarded unless you are talking strictly $$. No shit a $800 scope is cheaper than a $1600 one. You get what you pay for. People are still lining up to pay for a new razor while the bushels are getting blown out bellow cost because no one wants them.
you didn't provide any facts, merely opinion. Which is what I provided. Opinion.
