A FAMILY court judge dismissed the case yesterday claiming that since none of the plaintiffs have been arrested and charged with possession an the so called "texas suppressors" they do not have standing.
- Thread starter wvfarrier
- Start date
So, basically someone has to have their $h!t pushed in by the feds before the court will consider it
"No standing" Where has that been used before....
Texas will be more Californian than California very soon. It will be a wrap on this republic once it happens.
Basically some one has to make and sell a suppressor that follows the state law. Then the buyer and seller have to be arrested by the ATF to get this to court. I am not sure anyone wants to do that and get fucked over by the Feds.
That is correct.
So, everyone here needs to get a suppressor. And then wait for the ATF. And then have a gargantuan law suit and name this judge as a co-defendent for inspiring to commit a crime.
Unfortunately, yes. This.
to quote Robin Williams in "Good Will Hunting,"-Im too pretty for jail
"Son of a bitch, he stole my line."
As for you being too pretty for jail, yes, you are.
According to the ruling, injuries that would give a suing party standing include; applying for and being denied a form 1, and being made to pay the $200 tax on a made on Texas suppressor. It was also dismissed without prejudice, so the fliers can reapply when they have standing. The judge basically said “hey, go file the paperwork and re-file the suit…”
