• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Night Vision Thermal or NV scanner

DynamicAccuracy

DynamicAccuracy

Private
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
May 6, 2017
633
186
Mexico, MO
Just getting to night coyote hunting. Picked up a cheap sightmark wraith to get me by until my pulsar c50 comes in (wasn't sure it'd be here in time for our night coyote season starts). Figured I'd throw the wraith on a backup rifle in case somebody wants to go with me and they don't have NV. I've heard a thermal scanner is pretty handy to have but seems like you need to drop 3-4k on one for it to be even be worth a crap. Would something similar to a pvs14 fill my needs of spotting coyotes 4-500y out before they get right up on my call? I've thought a NV monocular on a ballistic helmet would be pretty nice especially for driving around at night looking for coyotes to go after. Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 338dude
74

I’m new to night hunting predators too. I’m not new to passive night vision. Uncle Sugar provided decent PNV for a couple decades. Issued PVS is great for driving or walking around in the dark. Takes some practice but easy enough to navigate. It may or may not be great for finding game. In open areas it works pretty well for orientation and detection. Nothing like a thermal tho.

I use a PVS-14 for scanning now and a thermal on the rifle. I’d love to have a helmet mounted thermal but It’s not in the cards right now.

In general I think PVS and thermal work best in combination. Each have strengths and weaknesses that pairing can help offset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 338dude and WhereNow&How
Rerun7 said:
You won’t be able to spot them well with NV. Thermal is the only way to go in regards to scanning. You can get an entry level thermal scanner for around $2k and see them coming in from a few hundred yards or more.
Click to expand...
Any you'd recommend in the low 2k range?
 
I had great experience with an entry level Pulsar scanner that I used for a few years but I’m not as familiar with their newer stuff.

If I were on the market today in that price range, I’d look at some of the entry level options thermal weapon sights from Bering. Small enough to be a scanner but can also be used on the gun. I’m a big fan of systems that can be used in multiple ways so that you have more options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Concrete shooter
You might check out the AGM Taipan models or AGM Rattler if you want the versatility of using for a scanner & mounting it on a rifle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DynamicAccuracy
Any of them can be a head mounted scanner with enough duct tape…. 😜

Flir Breach is about the only one I’ve heard of below $3k that would work in that capacity.

If you expand your budget up there are some good ones out there but they get pricey really quick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhereNow&How and DynamicAccuracy
Not mine, but someone has a BERING 25. VI be in the PX here under night vision. It is 2100 and can record a video and picture and stream to your phone. My super hogstev does the same thing and it is fun for your friend to be looking at the camera phone while you are shooting.

For wide open spaces I like 3X base magnification. My brother just bought a BURRIS BTS50 from Scheels for $2100. It says out of stock online but the Missoula, MT store still has three for that price as of last week. It is a rifle scope but can be used as a scanner but cannot record without buying a separate MDVR

regarding your original question, a thermal is much, much more effective than NV for spotting coyotes.
 
74gtf100 said:
Normally I hunt 20-40acre cut crop fields where I can see 300-700y
Click to expand...

That small areas . Me not hampered at all out scanning/spotting using 1x or 2x in those area sizes . Me.. I spot with Therm. shoot with NV .
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
I’ve used both. Not a ton but my perfect setup would be thermal scanner and either thermal or NV scope.

Thermal detects way easier compared to NV. The NV does come in handy for ID if you need it. Around here we have coyotes and wolves. Wolves are a no go for shooting. At night with a thermal it can be harder to id between the two. Especially at distance which is harder to judge at night with anything

Currently I just run a Bering Hogster R35. Which I use mostly as a scanner and Varmint rig on my air gun. The Bering works decent as a scanner but not helmet mounted.

I have a battery pack taped to a spare picatinny rail. Then I just attach the Hogster to that and plug in to the pack

You can cheap out a bit on the scanner as you’re just using to pick up the heat signature and can use the gun to ID. Seeing the difference between a deer and coyote at a couple hundred yards is easily achieved by sub $3k thermals. Even sub $2k will be decent with todays options
 
  • Like
Reactions: DynamicAccuracy
hafejd30 said:
I’ve used both. Not a ton but my perfect setup would be thermal scanner and either thermal or NV scope.

Thermal detects way easier compared to NV. The NV does come in handy for ID if you need it. Around here we have coyotes and wolves. Wolves are a no go for shooting. At night with a thermal it can be harder to id between the two. Especially at distance which is harder to judge at night with anything

Currently I just run a Bering Hogster R35. Which I use mostly as a scanner and Varmint rig on my air gun. The Bering works decent as a scanner but not helmet mounted.

I have a battery pack taped to a spare picatinny rail. Then I just attach the Hogster to that and plug in to the pack

You can cheap out a bit on the scanner as you’re just using to pick up the heat signature and can use the gun to ID. Seeing the difference between a deer and coyote at a couple hundred yards is easily achieved by sub $3k thermals. Even sub $2k will be decent with todays options
Click to expand...
That's why I went with a NV scope as well. I hunt alot within 600-700y of houses and I dont want to accidentally call somebody's dog in and shoot it thinkin it's a coyote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hafejd30
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: DynamicAccuracy, BurtG and Eric_F
srt-4_uk said:
I'll hold you hand for you

www.opticsplanet.com

Burris BTH 35 2.3-9.2x35mm Thermal Hand-held Monocular 300631-DEMO, Color: Black, Matte Black, Includes Blazin' Deal w/ Free S&H

Shop Burris BTH 35 2.3-9.2x35mm Thermal Hand-held Monocular | 4.8 Star Rating on 4 Reviews for Burris BTH 35 2.3-9.2x35mm Thermal Hand-held Monocular Blazin' Deal + Free Shipping over $49.
www.opticsplanet.com www.opticsplanet.com
Click to expand...

That’s crazy cheap. Makes me feel like there has to be a catch. You typically get what you pay for with thermal
 
  • Like
Reactions: softcock
Just saw this thread and picked one up! Thanks for the link!
 
Dang, at that price I snagged one too for a backup / loaner when my kids go out with me.

Figure I can resell it for that much if I end up not liking it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waspocrew
AGM Taipan TM15-384 is the best china made deal around for an internal battery scanner with a good FOV, wide display screen and is helmet mountable for around $1,200 new.
After testing one, I bought it and have been using it for the last two years as a backup and loaner without issue.
TM15-384
AGM Mount
 
Thanks for all the help. I was pretty set on the agm tiapan but after seeing the SMOKING deal on the burris I went with it. Hopefully Opticsplanet doesn't pull their usually bullshit and wait 3 months before shipping because it was "in stock"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eric_F
2aBaCa said:
right, so tell me more about the duct tape mounting system. will it work for a rifle?
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20221129_194135_Chrome.jpg

Saw this on optics planet questions lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2aBaC̶a̶ and Rerun7
Speaking of Optics Planet. I know some people hate on them but if you buy items that are in stock they’ve been great.

The thermal has already shipped, will be here Saturday so I’ll update you guys on how it is.
 
Rerun7 said:
Speaking of Optics Planet. I know some people hate on them but if you buy items that are in stock they’ve been great.

The thermal has already shipped, will be here Saturday so I’ll update you guys on how it is.
Click to expand...
I've bought stuff before that said in stock and then magically it wasn't. But I already got a shipping confirmation on my thermal so I'm glad
 
Couldn’t pass on the price of the BTH35 either - looking forward to using it soon!
 
I have a Burris and used it a lot hunting last week. I don’t know that I’d call it amazing, but for what it is, “cheaper” consumer grade entry-level stuff, it works pretty well. I could make a long list of things I wish were better or different, but I am still quite happy with it so far. No it’s not multi thousand dollar quality gear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waspocrew
Just received the Burris 35 last night. It’s nice for what it is: an entry level thermal device. It suits my needs perfectly(scanning for coyotes in the neighborhood while walking the dogs). I’m thrilled with the product at the price point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waspocrew
Got the bth35 in today and got to play around with it for a few minutes. As already mentioned it’s not comparable to multi-thousand dollar units but for $800 it seems like it’s going to work pretty well.

I’m going to try and get back out for some hogs/coyote later this week and will get to do a better test with it.

First impressions:

Form factor: it’s heavy and somewhat bulky (won’t fit in my bino pouch).

Refresh rate: It has some lag until the unit warms up a bit then it seems to pretty much go away.

Image: Not as good as I was hoping but not terrible. Contrast/detail are lacking and things seem to just blur together regardless of the settings. The wood fence at 20yds in my back yard looked like a wall vs seeing the individual boards. Despite it having higher specs I would say the image isn’t as good as my trail xq38. Black hot looked terrible, white hot had more detail. However, from what I could see I think I will be able to spot and PID hogs vs deer vs coyote at a few hundred yards. Will confirm when I go out.

Menu/features: easy to navigate, I like the color palettes, standby and button layout.

Overall: for $800 I think it’s going to be pretty solid. It doesn’t compare to the higher end units but that’s not what it is. It’s miles better than the first Flir scanner I had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waspocrew
Rerun7 said:
Got the bth35 in today and got to play around with it for a few minutes. As already mentioned it’s not comparable to multi-thousand dollar units but for $800 it seems like it’s going to work pretty well.

I’m going to try and get back out for some hogs/coyote later this week and will get to do a better test with it.

First impressions:

Form factor: it’s heavy and somewhat bulky (won’t fit in my bino pouch).

Refresh rate: It has some lag until the unit warms up a bit then it seems to pretty much go away.

Image: Not as good as I was hoping but not terrible. Contrast/detail are lacking and things seem to just blur together regardless of the settings. The wood fence at 20yds in my back yard looked like a wall vs seeing the individual boards. Despite it having higher specs I would say the image isn’t as good as my trail xq38. Black hot looked terrible, white hot had more detail. However, from what I could see I think I will be able to spot and PID hogs vs deer vs coyote at a few hundred yards. Will confirm when I go out.

Menu/features: easy to navigate, I like the color palettes, standby and button layout.

Overall: for $800 I think it’s going to be pretty solid. It doesn’t compare to the higher end units but that’s not what it is. It’s miles better than the first Flir scanner I had.
Click to expand...
I rode around til midnight last night with mine and was able to see coyotes and deer out to 700ish yards. Was able to identify them from one another at around 400-500. Cattle I could see around 800. While it does have higher magnification I never ran it above 1.5x because it was just too grainy. Zooming in didn't really help with identification. It might not be the best but it'll suit my needs. I just need to see coyotes coming from 500-600y away to make sure I'm ready to take a shot when they get to 300 and in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rerun7
Rerun7 said:
Image: Not as good as I was hoping but not terrible. Contrast/detail are lacking and things seem to just blur together regardless of the settings. The wood fence at 20yds in my back yard looked like a wall vs seeing the individual boards. Despite it having higher specs I would say the image isn’t as good as my trail xq38. Black hot looked terrible, white hot had more detail. However, from what I could see I think I will be able to spot and PID hogs vs deer vs coyote at a few hundred yards. Will confirm when I go out.
Click to expand...
The handheld has a focus ring up front. Turn it and the fence will look like a fence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG and long range sponge
Rerun7 said:
Image: Not as good as I was hoping but not terrible. Contrast/detail are lacking and things seem to just blur together regardless of the settings.
Click to expand...

This can happen at times, but it also depends on what you're looking at. Last monday night walking back to camp I was crossing a field and couldn't make out anything. But the more I thought about it, it was in the mid 20's, had been all day, sun had been down a long time. "everything looks the same because everything's about the same temperature". Once I got back near the woods and more towards a road and some other structures, plenty to see.


It does seem to work better some times than others.
 
srt-4_uk said:
The handheld has a focus ring up front. Turn it and the fence will look like a fence.
Click to expand...

I used the focus, that was my first thought. I’ll try to snag some pics later. Keep in mind, I don’t expect it to look like a 640 unit. I actually don’t care much about that type of detail vs being able to distinguish different types of animals at a few hundred yards.
 
cas6969 said:
This can happen at times, but it also depends on what you're looking at. Last monday night walking back to camp I was crossing a field and couldn't make out anything. But the more I thought about it, it was in the mid 20's, had been all day, sun had been down a long time. "everything looks the same because everything's about the same temperature". Once I got back near the woods and more towards a road and some other structures, plenty to see.


It does seem to work better some times than others.
Click to expand...

Yep, I hunt with thermal on a pretty regular basis. Some conditions are better than others. A few days ago I was out and it had been overcast all day, misty rain and temp at about 35°. A lot of the scenery was washed out. However, living things still pop in the image.

I’ll try and get some comparison pics today vs other units.

Again - for $800 I’m not going to be too critical 😜
 
You have the three settings of "Nature, enhanced.... and errr um.... something"? Or something like that anyway. I noticed that which one works best really depends on conditions. Some times they make a huge difference, other times they seem to make no difference at all. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: DynamicAccuracy
There is an enhanced mode somewhere in the settings. I changed this and the resolution was much, much better.

Does anyone run anything other that white hot?
 
Any of you guys had trouble getting it to connect to the app? Was going to take some pics but can’t get passed this screen. It shows it’s connected to the handheld Wi-Fi in my settings.

7A594AC5-EE1C-4DC9-B229-2EAB1B4E0E1A.png
 
Ok so after reading this I figured I would jump into thermal with the BTH35 as well for that price. It should be here tomorrow. Any feedback on the BTS50 for the rifle? Is there anything close to it for $1800-2000?
@IDMilton
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suicideprodigy
Thermal scanner comparison
Replies
2
Views
681
Suicideprodigy
Suicideprodigy
R
Night vision vs Thermal
Replies
8
Views
260
FuhQ
FuhQ
I
Night Vision Thermal Options - Helmet, Clip-on, Scanner...?
Replies
33
Views
2K
Zebulon
Z
J
Night Vision 384 thermal scanners
Replies
6
Views
318
Jnull
J
2brothers641
Night Vision Thermal scanner options
Replies
2
Views
357
Euro.Connor
E
Top Bottom
Back