This seems like a great scope with a good power range. It seems compact and light and I like the TMR reticle. The downside is no illuminated reticle but not a huge deal. Those that have this scope are you happy with it?
I just got one to replace a S&B 5-25 on my TRG. I mounted it last night and my impressions are all really early:
It's 1 lb. lighter than the S&B and much shorter. Most of the competing compact scopes are all at least 1/2lb heavier than the Leupold. Most full size tactical scopes are 1lb. heavier like the S&B. So to compare the Leupold against the much bigger and heavier scopes is probably not the best idea. But with that said, for the weight and size my initial feeling is the scope is a good value.
I have the pinch turrets. They feel good to me. They are not as crisp as the S&B, but much better than my Steiner. The are slightly less distinct than the NF F1s I run, but pretty close for being a 10 mil per turn version.
The pinch turrets are new to me. My initial playing with them I don't find them too off putting, but they do take a deliberate grabbing to set the elevation. This is good and bad. Good in that you have to grab them specifically to turn them to your elevation. Bad perhaps in a fast paced PRS style stage where you have a few seconds to dial elevation between targets. It could in theory slow you down if you flub the grip, but I'm not sure this 1% scenario is worth worrying over for most.
I wanted the pinch turrets so I could set the scope on a max point blank elevation when hunting and not worry about knocking the dial off when walking with the rifle. The pinch turrets allow me to set an elevation and know it will stay there when I need it. The lower profile turrets look like a good option though, but only lock at zero. This is probably fine for most people.
The critical eye relief seems good. Not picky at all. My March scope was a similar size and it was extremely picky about where your head was when you used it.
Mag range is good. At 3X the field of view is wide and no serious distortions. At 18 X the same thing. My S&B 5-25 tunnels so bad at 5-7X that I consider it pretty much a 7-25X scope. The March scope had very bad distortion at 3X power and at 24X power the reticle was so large and eye relief so touchy that I didn't find it that useful. The Leupold seems to hit a usable mag range without too much compromise.
Leupold comes with a capped windage. Most scopes still expose the windage and for tactical field shooting and hunting it's completely worthless and just going to cause trouble. I have not dialed wind since the last time I shot F-class almost 7 years ago. I only hold for wind and that is what most shooters I know do. So the windage should be capped unless it's a pure target scope.
Parallax seems OK. The S&B feels better and is more precise. But the Leupold seems Ok so far in initial testing. It just feels cheaper.
I don't have the illumination as I never really use it for any kind of longer range shooting.
I like the TMR reticle. It's clean and easily seen at 3X and 18X without being cluttered.
I'll post a full review once I get out and use it, but for what the scope is and for the price, I'm happy so far.
The big thing is that this scope offers very light weight and compact size with full size features. If that's what you want, then it's something to consider. It will give up optical performance vs. a larger 56mm scope almost certainly. But it is significantly lighter and lower profile. Just pick what is important to you.
For me, I've grown tired of having my most expensive long range rifles also be the most useless to carry because of the excessive weight. They are basically relegated to range use, short hikes, or quad bikes. I wanted to lighten up my long range rifles so they are more usable for hunts and the Leupold helped get me there.
My TRG is in .260 with a carbon barrel. It is about 11.5lbs. with the Leupold scope now. Still not a lightweight, but for a long range hunting rig with magazine and solid accuracy with long strings of fire, it's a much better weight than most.