I think a better answer is term limits. Our system was never intended for full-time career politicians.
- Thread starter sirhrmechanic
- Start date
Getting money out of politics is the exact opposite of the true problem. There is so much money influencing politics because there is power and influence to be gained by force. If gov stayed the fuck out of entrepreneurs’ way, lowered everyone’s tax burden, & stopped making it difficult to keep a small business open the largest/most corrupt corporations would need to actually compete in the market for everyone’s business
Last edited:
and how the fuck is a 3rd party going to stop election theft?
if this shitshow isnt unfucked NOW, every election that comes afterward wont matter-idgaf how many parties you have running.
a 3rd party isnt the answer. ferreting out the rats is.
if this shitshow isnt unfucked NOW, every election that comes afterward wont matter-idgaf how many parties you have running.
a 3rd party isnt the answer. ferreting out the rats is.
The only answer is a no party system. Vote with your thumbprint associated with facial recognition. If proven that somebody is voting in a fraudulent manner, you execute them on the spot
A third party is what messed things up here in GA for the Senate. Since our system works on a 50%-plus-one requirement, having three parties means that unless a particular candidate gets enough support, it'll end in a runoff. Which it is this time around.
The special election for the other seat was even more of a clusterfuck 'cause there were at least three parties running and a whole host of nothing candidates who scattered the votes so much that the "winner" only came out with 30-something% of the vote. So how that's gonna end, I don't know.
Party reformation? Yes. A third party to further fuck with the votes in a system that was originally no-party and shifted to a two-party system? No, I don't think that'll work out well.
The special election for the other seat was even more of a clusterfuck 'cause there were at least three parties running and a whole host of nothing candidates who scattered the votes so much that the "winner" only came out with 30-something% of the vote. So how that's gonna end, I don't know.
Party reformation? Yes. A third party to further fuck with the votes in a system that was originally no-party and shifted to a two-party system? No, I don't think that'll work out well.