Me too.
Was thinking about how retarded it is, that when 1 person out of 250m+ does something stupid, the reactive measure is to try and punish everyone else. Yeah, fuck you, and fuck your plan.
So why not pick an issue the communists hold dear, and everytime they want to 'have a conversation' about their faggot fucking 'gun control' shit, we counter instantly with whatever topic we tie to it. Instead of countering them with facts we counter them with their same exact bullshit, because short of shooting people in the face, its the only way it'll be dropped.
This is a 2 tierd counter; first, its reactive bullshit to their reactive bullshit that they will now know and associate with what happens when they start up with the same tired bullshit again. It makes the argument not fucking worth it for them. Secondly, it changes the argument from 'ban something' to an argument fighting over 2 entirely seperate things and all the confusing bullshit that comes with it. Not only will it not be worth it, but you could also end up losing something over bringing it up as well as your argument becomes diluted because everyone is now fighting about 15 different things.
Them: Ban guns! We need more gun control!
Us: Lets repeal obamacame completely.
Them: OMG save the children! Ban guns!
Us: Let's get rid of welfare and child tax credits
Them: OMG OMG guns
Us: We're completely pulling out of NATO and the EU can fuck themselves
How is this not a thing?
Was thinking about how retarded it is, that when 1 person out of 250m+ does something stupid, the reactive measure is to try and punish everyone else. Yeah, fuck you, and fuck your plan.
So why not pick an issue the communists hold dear, and everytime they want to 'have a conversation' about their faggot fucking 'gun control' shit, we counter instantly with whatever topic we tie to it. Instead of countering them with facts we counter them with their same exact bullshit, because short of shooting people in the face, its the only way it'll be dropped.
This is a 2 tierd counter; first, its reactive bullshit to their reactive bullshit that they will now know and associate with what happens when they start up with the same tired bullshit again. It makes the argument not fucking worth it for them. Secondly, it changes the argument from 'ban something' to an argument fighting over 2 entirely seperate things and all the confusing bullshit that comes with it. Not only will it not be worth it, but you could also end up losing something over bringing it up as well as your argument becomes diluted because everyone is now fighting about 15 different things.
Them: Ban guns! We need more gun control!
Us: Lets repeal obamacame completely.
Them: OMG save the children! Ban guns!
Us: Let's get rid of welfare and child tax credits
Them: OMG OMG guns
Us: We're completely pulling out of NATO and the EU can fuck themselves
How is this not a thing?