Trump ordered to release financials
- Thread starter Nik H
- Start date
It's gonna go up to SCOTUS. We'll see where it goes from there. I still don't know how congress can probe into personal Financials of an individual without a warrant. They are oversight and legislation, not law enforcement/investigative.
They're stomping all over the separation of powers for political opposition research purposes.
They're stomping all over the separation of powers for political opposition research purposes.
I'd make it contingent on having the following also released:
- Every member of congress' tax returns for the entire length of time they've been in office
- Reason Michelle Obama was disbarred
- Reason Clinton is disbarred
- Obama's college thesis papers that seem to be locked away for some odd reason
- Every member of congress' tax returns for the entire length of time they've been in office
- Reason Michelle Obama was disbarred
- Reason Clinton is disbarred
- Obama's college thesis papers that seem to be locked away for some odd reason
I haven't had a chance to really investigate it but since Congress wrote a subpoena that Trump disregarded, the court got involved.
Not a lawyer so can't say anything relevant.
Not a lawyer so can't say anything relevant.
Rather than investigate a billionaire who became a politician, a smart person would investigate politicians who became millionaires.
(Won't ever happen because the libturds are not smart people)
(Won't ever happen because the libturds are not smart people)
I'll release my financial information - if Michelle is a female, Hussein is a citizen, and Nadler is a human.
Congress is only supposed to be investigating things that have a purview to the legislative law making process.
so what is their reasoning for this? other than "Orange Man Bad REEEEEEEEEE "
so what is their reasoning for this? other than "Orange Man Bad REEEEEEEEEE "
They seek to create the public perception of President Trumps corruption. After all why would they keep investigating if there was nothing there. I wonder if most of everything the parties do is just theater to play to their base.
everything. anything.
They have decided to investigate a man, instead of investigating a crime. Swap the political parties positions and insert Obama instead of Trump and the media and all celebrities would be having a complete meltdown.
They are fighting for their lives. They know that he stands a damn good chance of beating anyone running on the Dumocrat side in 2020.
They are on a fishing expedition and hoping to catch a big one. It will be a shit show to watch. It will also prevent them from accomplishing their primary mission of being the legislative arm which may turn out to be a good thing.
They need to ahift the FISA/Spying attention from them to Trump .
I hope these arroganr bastards take him out in cuffs for contempt .
If that's not the s8gn everybody's been looking for the God himself couldnt get The US off its ass .
I hope these arroganr bastards take him out in cuffs for contempt .
If that's not the s8gn everybody's been looking for the God himself couldnt get The US off its ass .
D
Deleted member 10043
Guest
The judge is overstepping and stretching it.
“Courts have grappled for more than a century with the question of the scope of Congress’s investigative power,” Mehta wrote in the decision. “The binding principle that emerges from these judicial decisions is that courts must presume Congress is acting in furtherance of its constitutional responsibility to legislate and must defer to congressional judgments about what Congress needs to carry out that purpose.”
So, I don't see much in the way of Congress legislating in accordance with the Constitution. This subpoena is a perfect example. Anyway, Judge Judy can settle this whole thing in thirty minutes and that is with commercials. Congressional investigations take on the appearance of a show trial. I'm not ignorant enough to assume that courts must presume that Congress is acting in furtherance of constitutional responsibility. Not with the constant grandstanding and sedition going on. Not to mention Congressional trend to legislate through the court of their choosing. They can't have it both ways and they know it
“Courts have grappled for more than a century with the question of the scope of Congress’s investigative power,” Mehta wrote in the decision. “The binding principle that emerges from these judicial decisions is that courts must presume Congress is acting in furtherance of its constitutional responsibility to legislate and must defer to congressional judgments about what Congress needs to carry out that purpose.”
So, I don't see much in the way of Congress legislating in accordance with the Constitution. This subpoena is a perfect example. Anyway, Judge Judy can settle this whole thing in thirty minutes and that is with commercials. Congressional investigations take on the appearance of a show trial. I'm not ignorant enough to assume that courts must presume that Congress is acting in furtherance of constitutional responsibility. Not with the constant grandstanding and sedition going on. Not to mention Congressional trend to legislate through the court of their choosing. They can't have it both ways and they know it
Its a sideshow while the rest of the horses are ferreted out of the barn and positions are reserved at the next governing table.
A tit for tat approach would pull the drain plug, but somehow no one puts their fingers on the pull chain.
Not changing my opinion till AJ see's nooses lining the capital.
A tit for tat approach would pull the drain plug, but somehow no one puts their fingers on the pull chain.
Not changing my opinion till AJ see's nooses lining the capital.
Meanwhile what has been done to shore up legitimacy of the next election cycle?
Hmmm?
Hmmm?
So now Trump’s appeal to shield his financial records is going to a court headed by Merrick Garland?
Similar threads
