Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For $7500 you can get an s/es, which is way more than $1500 better than an unlocked Raptar which really is only a moderately good FP illuminator. And you get factory service.6k is probably a fair start.
There's nothing illegal about it so I don't see how. That said, may want to at least know that whoever gets it understands what it can do if aimed at a person or car, and most definitely the serious trouble that can be had if it was directed at aircraft. I would think anyone here that's an active member would fit that description.Would I have any legal issues with selling it unlocked?
I don't think the other vendor got pissed off because some vendor was unlocking them, rather they got pissed off because of the antics of said vendor.
My unlocked RAPTAR cost me $4,300 and my Kestrel Elite which is night and day easier to use than the S/ES cost me $600 for a total of savings of $2,600 as compared to the S/ES plus I have range cards and wind reading capability.For $7500 you can get an s/es, which is way more than $1500 better than an unlocked Raptar which really is only a moderately good FP illuminator. And you get factory service.
No and anyone that tells you otherwise is full of shit. The only issue is that it is an ITAR controlled item so there needs to be some caution with who you sell it to and some paperwork that needs to be signed.Would I have any legal issues with selling it unlocked?
At 4300 it is fine. At 6000 it is ridiculous.My unlocked RAPTAR cost me $4,300 and my Kestrel Elite which is night and day easier to use than the S/ES cost me $600 for a total of savings of $2,600 as compared to the S/ES.
The Kestrel in night mode has a larger screen and navigating through the menus is a lot easier IMHO. Add the FP lasers and FP illuminator, which BLOWS AWAY the one on the S/ES, and it is a no brainer. The fact that the S/ES has an illuminator is comical...it is useless. Therefore, you need a real illuminator plus the S/ES which is going to push the cost to more than $7,500. The integration of ballistics attached to a 1970s display is also kind of ridiculous. The only advantage of the S/ES is the TRAC IR capability but then you need an optic that can take advantage of that capability.
Nothing is perfect...The warranty issue is not really an issue. If it fails under warranty, WILCOX has to repair it but will turn it back to ES mode. So what. The LRF is still better than anything out there other than a Vectronix which is a shit ton more money. I had a SilencerCo RADIUS and a Terrapin X and this LRF blows both away in speed and ability to produce good readings in all conditions on small targets. I think it is worth the original cost of the locked unit. So I would be out the unlocking fee...big deal. If it fails out of warranty, the cost of repair would be high enough where I would toss it and buy whatever is new on the market.
The S is 100mw and is perfectly clean from edge to edge. The S ES is laughable when it comes to IR, but the range finder and AB still make it worth it in my book. It’s a very handy tool no doubt.
You've shot 1000 yards at night using NV and the WILCOX IR Illuminator? That is impressive.Originally there were two high power models, one at 50mW and one at 80mW specifically for the illuminator. The 80mW version was discontinued some time ago and Wilcox has only been selling the 50mW version for the past few years.
I agree the S illuminator is pretty clean and 50mW is plenty for >1k yards (1k is the furthest I have made shots with it, but it can definitely go much further). I also find integrated AB much more convenient then a kestrel and LRF.
I was using a Tangent Theta 5-25x and stock PVS-27. It was super calm and only dialed 0.9mil for wind, most of which was from the PVS-27 collimation.You've shot 1000 yards at night using NV and the WILCOX IR Illuminator? That is impressive.
What did you use for optical setup? I would assume a day scope with NV clip on?
What about wind?
I would love an integrated solution but I also want FP IR versus a separate unit. If I could find an RAPTAR S for sale, I would go that route
I have a pvs24-LR that I intend to use for long range at night. What illuminator would be best? The d-bal A2? I don't know which FP illuminator would work best for being able to illuminate my target with a dialed scope.I was using a Tangent Theta 5-25x and stock PVS-27. It was super calm and only dialed 0.9mil for wind, most of which was from the PVS-27 collimation.
The reason a FP Raptar isn’t the end all is it should always be pointed where your zeroed reticle points, that way you have confidence in what you range. So as soon as you dial in your solution, your illuminator isn’t pointed at your target. If you want to illuminate your target, you need to widen the beam of the illuminator to cover that difference. As I said the 50mW illuminator can do this fine, it’s just not ideal.
That said I wouldn’t hesitate to use a eye safe Raptar and a secondary FP laser. Ideally I would pick an illuminator with tool less adjustment like a LA5 or DBAL A2, that way you can easily adjust the beam to where you dial your scope.
There is a very reasonably priced LA-5 for sale in the exchange.I have a pvs24-LR that I intend to use for long range at night. What illuminator would be best? The d-bal A2? I don't know which FP illuminator would work best for being able to illuminate my target with a dialed scope.
DBAL-A2 or LA5 would work fine and both have tool less adjustment. Neither have super clean illuminators, but still work fine. DBAL-D2 has good range too, but no adjustment for the illuminator so better on a spotter. The LUNA is also impressive considering the price.I have a pvs24-LR that I intend to use for long range at night. What illuminator would be best? The d-bal A2? I don't know which FP illuminator would work best for being able to illuminate my target with a dialed scope.
False.Originally there were two high power models, one at 50mW and one at 80mW specifically for the illuminator. The 80mW version was discontinued some time ago and Wilcox has only been selling the 50mW version for the past few years.
I agree the S illuminator is pretty clean and 50mW is plenty for >1k yards (1k is the furthest I have made shots with it, but it can definitely go much further). I also find integrated AB much more convenient then a kestrel and LRF.
I was using a Tangent Theta 5-25x and stock PVS-27. It was super calm and only dialed 0.9mil for wind, most of which was from the PVS-27 collimation.
The reason a FP Raptar isn’t the end all is it should always be pointed where your zeroed reticle points, that way you have confidence in what you range. So as soon as you dial in your solution, your illuminator isn’t pointed at your target. If you want to illuminate your target, you need to widen the beam of the illuminator to cover that difference. As I said the 50mW illuminator can do this fine, it’s just not ideal.
That said I wouldn’t hesitate to use a eye safe Raptar and a secondary FP laser. Ideally I would pick an illuminator with tool less adjustment like a LA5 or DBAL A2, that way you can easily adjust the beam to where you dial your scope.
One of the reasons why the Atilla is still one of the very best clip on illuminators.True.
The raptar would have made a better tool with tool less zero adjustment on the illuminator. This is a big deal on systems like the LA-5 when paired with long range optics use for night festivities.
I have a pvs24-LR that I intend to use for long range at night. What illuminator would be best? The d-bal A2? I don't know which FP illuminator would work best for being able to illuminate my target with a dialed scope.
Unfortunately that sticker does not represent the actual power of the illuminator. I have the same exact sticker on mine and it is for sure a 50mW model. So I think Wilcox uses it as a generic laser safety CYA label, and/or they are adding the IR pointer and illuminator numbers together to get a total output. This is in contrast to the PEQ-15 series where the sticker is different for the PEQ-15, LA5, and UHP. So unless you can find a spec sheet from Wilcox showing a 100mW illuminator, my earlier statement is still true.False.
Unfortunately that sticker does not represent the actual power of the illuminator. I have the same exact sticker on mine and it is for sure a 50mW model. So I think Wilcox uses it as a generic laser safety CYA label, and/or they are adding the IR pointer and illuminator numbers together to get a total output. This is in contrast to the PEQ-15 series where the sticker is different for the PEQ-15, LA5, and UHP. So unless you can find a spec sheet from Wilcox showing a 100mW illuminator, my earlier statement is still true.
Nice, I agree it would be nice to have a more definitive answer.Just lobbed a Q into Wilcox to get to the bottom of it. You might be onto something, and my curiosity is taking over.
Ahhh crap…Unfortunately that sticker does not represent the actual power of the illuminator. I have the same exact sticker on mine and it is for sure a 50mW model. So I think Wilcox uses it as a generic laser safety CYA label, and/or they are adding the IR pointer and illuminator numbers together to get a total output. This is in contrast to the PEQ-15 series where the sticker is different for the PEQ-15, LA5, and UHP. So unless you can find a spec sheet from Wilcox showing a 100mW illuminator, my earlier statement is still true.
Welcome back.Ahhh crap…
I’ll chime-in.
The 100mW label on the “full power” Raptar-S indeed *IS* an actual 100mW. I have both FP Raptar-S units and have/had a couple of different unlocked 50mW non-S units. I compared them in a post last year. The 100mW labeled unit is definitely more powerful when both are set to maximum output — they’re very clearly not the same.
That said, I’ve “heard” the label *might* be the laser diode rating and not necessarily the actual output rating. The outputs on both the Rap-S and Raid-X are physicallyat 100mW and, at least visually, look identical when set to a similar circumference/focus/width for all practical purposes. Without actual test measuring equipment, it is nearly impossible to reliably tell the difference between 80mW and 100mW output, but you CAN clearly see the difference between the 50/100mW labeled units.
The one thing I can say is that when directly comparing the Raid-X (100mW labeled) and the NGAL (80mW labeled), the RAID illuminator is slightly better/brighter and is more uniform — but that can’t necessarily be attributed exclusively to their rated outputs.
View attachment 7663953
WhereThere’s a legit full power ab ballistics Raptar S in the for sale section
Where
False.Ahhh crap…
I’ll chime-in.
The 100mW label on the “full power” Raptar-S indeed *IS* an actual 100mW. I have both FP Raptar-S units and have/had a couple of different unlocked 50mW non-S units. I compared them in a post last year. The 100mW labeled unit is definitely more powerful when both are set to maximum output — they’re very clearly not the same.
That said, I’ve “heard” the label *might* be the laser diode rating and not necessarily the actual output rating. The outputs on both the Rap-S and Raid-X are physically labeled at 100mW and, at least visually, look identical when set to a similar circumference/focus/width for all practical purposes. Without actual test measuring equipment, it is nearly impossible to reliably tell the difference between 80mW and 100mW output, but you CAN clearly see the difference between the 50/100mW labeled units.
The one thing I can say is that when directly comparing the Raid-X (100mW labeled) and the NGAL (80mW labeled), the RAID illuminator is slightly better/brighter and is more uniform — but that can’t necessarily be attributed exclusively to their rated outputs.
ETA: The discrepancies could boil down to something as simple as Wilcox marketing and documentation not having direct contact with engineering and manufacturing and getting their info through intermediaries.
View attachment 7663953
Ahhh crap…
I’ll chime-in.
The 100mW label on the “full power” Raptar-S indeed *IS* an actual 100mW. I have both FP Raptar-S units and have/had a couple of different unlocked 50mW non-S units. I compared them in a post last year. The 100mW labeled unit is definitely more powerful when both are set to maximum output — they’re very clearly not the same.
That said, I’ve “heard” the label *might* be the laser diode rating and not necessarily the actual output rating. The outputs on both the Rap-S and Raid-X are physically labeled at 100mW and, at least visually, look identical when set to a similar circumference/focus/width for all practical purposes. Without actual test measuring equipment, it is nearly impossible to reliably tell the difference between 80mW and 100mW output, but you CAN clearly see the difference between the 50/100mW labeled units.
The one thing I can say is that when directly comparing the Raid-X (100mW labeled) and the NGAL (80mW labeled), the RAID illuminator is slightly better/brighter and is more uniform — but that can’t necessarily be attributed exclusively to their rated outputs.
ETA: The discrepancies could boil down to something as simple as Wilcox marketing and documentation not having direct contact with engineering and manufacturing and getting their info through intermediaries.
View attachment 7663953
False.
I just got an email from Chuck at Wilcox who confirmed both the illuminator and laser are 80mw. 100mw would have been sweet though.
Interesting. Was Chuck specific about which model? There was a G03 high power model which was 80mW, but they only sell the G01 now which is claimed to be 50mW. Also, are you sure about the pointer being 80mW? That doesn’t align with any marketing documents or the user manual. Even between the G01 and G03 the pointer is stated as being 50mW.False.
I just got an email from Chuck at Wilcox who confirmed both the illuminator and laser are 80mw. 100mw would have been sweet though.
As mentioned earlier, there was a 80mW S produced at some point, so that could explain why your S looks brighter then a unlocked non-S. Is yours a model G03?Ahhh crap…
I’ll chime-in.
The 100mW label on the “full power” Raptar-S indeed *IS* an actual 100mW. I have both FP Raptar-S units and have/had a couple of different unlocked 50mW non-S units. I compared them in a post last year. The 100mW labeled unit is definitely more powerful when both are set to maximum output — they’re very clearly not the same.
That said, I’ve “heard” the label *might* be the laser diode rating and not necessarily the actual output rating. The outputs on both the Rap-S and Raid-X are physically labeled at 100mW and, at least visually, look identical when set to a similar circumference/focus/width for all practical purposes. Without actual test measuring equipment, it is nearly impossible to reliably tell the difference between 80mW and 100mW output, but you CAN clearly see the difference between the 50/100mW labeled units.
The one thing I can say is that when directly comparing the Raid-X (100mW labeled) and the NGAL (80mW labeled), the RAID illuminator is slightly better/brighter and is more uniform — but that can’t necessarily be attributed exclusively to their rated outputs.
ETA: The discrepancies could boil down to something as simple as Wilcox marketing and documentation not having direct contact with engineering and manufacturing and getting their info through intermediaries.
Welcome back.![]()
As mentioned earlier, there was a 80mW S produced at some point, so that could explain why your S looks brighter then a unlocked non-S. Is yours a model G03?
Like I said earlier, I wouldn’t be surprised if the 100mW label is referring to the pointer and illuminator combined, especially since they are co-aligned.
You know what you are talking about.I was using a Tangent Theta 5-25x and stock PVS-27. It was super calm and only dialed 0.9mil for wind, most of which was from the PVS-27 collimation.
The reason a FP Raptar isn’t the end all is it should always be pointed where your zeroed reticle points, that way you have confidence in what you range. So as soon as you dial in your solution, your illuminator isn’t pointed at your target. If you want to illuminate your target, you need to widen the beam of the illuminator to cover that difference. As I said the 50mW illuminator can do this fine, it’s just not ideal.
That said I wouldn’t hesitate to use a eye safe Raptar and a secondary FP laser. Ideally I would pick an illuminator with tool less adjustment like a LA5 or DBAL A2, that way you can easily adjust the beam to where you dial your scope.
Ahh, good to hear from you. Things been kinda boring during your absence.Ahhh crap…
I’ll chime-in.
The 100mW label on the “full power” Raptar-S indeed *IS* an actual 100mW. I have both FP Raptar-S units and have/had a couple of different unlocked 50mW non-S units. I compared them in a post last year. The 100mW labeled unit is definitely more powerful when both are set to maximum output — they’re very clearly not the same.
That said, I’ve “heard” the label *might* be the laser diode rating and not necessarily the actual output rating. The outputs on both the Rap-S and Raid-X are physically labeled at 100mW and, at least visually, look identical when set to a similar circumference/focus/width for all practical purposes. Without actual test measuring equipment, it is nearly impossible to reliably tell the difference between 80mW and 100mW output, but you CAN clearly see the difference between the 50/100mW labeled units.
The one thing I can say is that when directly comparing the Raid-X (100mW labeled) and the NGAL (80mW labeled), the RAID illuminator is slightly better/brighter and is more uniform — but that can’t necessarily be attributed exclusively to their rated outputs.
ETA: The discrepancies could boil down to something as simple as Wilcox marketing and documentation not having direct contact with engineering and manufacturing and getting their info through intermediaries.
View attachment 7663953
Learn more below about how you can win. First challenge coming soon!
View thread