Re: Vortex Razor HD 5-20x50 Advice
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dieselten</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LoneWolfUSMC</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dieselten</div><div class="ubbcode-body">IMO those 2 scopes do very different things. They are both great but....different.
The Razor is FFP and has a VERY thick reticle.
The NXS is SFP and has a VERY thin reticle.
The choice should depend on your intended use. The thin reticle is much better for precise shooting, while FFP and a thick reticle are very fast and easy to use/see. The thick reticle does give up a little bit if extreme precision is your intention. </div></div>
You are assuming much.
First, two of the four Razor HD reticle options offer an open center for precise targets. They also have "hold off" dots below the horizontal stadia lines. If you somehow ended up in a benchrest competition with your tactical rifle, you just dial down and left 1 mRad and use the eety-beety dots as your aiming point.
Second, you are incorrect by stating that "NXS are SFP". The main NXS scope that is compared to the Razor HD is the NXS F1. Which is in fact a FFP scope. </div></div>
OP made no mention of "F1". In lieu of that I assumed "standard" NXS SFP.
My statement is true, the NXS reticle is much thinner.
</div></div>
You should read more. The OP already acknowledged this. So in fact he was talking about the NXS F1. John isn't going to come back and point this out to you, he just rolls on.
To the OP, I have played the scope game. I am fully satisfied with my Razor. It has been the only scope in my collection that hasn't been sold or traded off.