Rifle Scopes What if tracking is more important than view?

[ShtrRdy]

For a scope in the $400 range, what brand and model would you recommend if I ranked the following in importance:

1. Tracking
2. Hold zero
3. Clarity

Let's say the max magnification is 14x to 16x.

- Todd

 

[DannySeesUSMC]

Re: What if tracking is more important than view?

You will probably find the best bet for quality at that price is a lower mag variable or fixed power. Maybe a more expensive scope that is used for sale on the forum or SWFA's samplelist.com

 

[crnkin]

Re: What if tracking is more important than view?

Weaver super slam, nikon buckmasters, SWFA, not much else.

I know the super slams and buckmasters track bang on, because I have used them myself, and the SWFA has a great reputation but I havent received mine yet.

Super slam is my pick of the bunch, but the buckmasters is cheaper

Chris

 

[leadbullet]

Re: What if tracking is more important than view?

SWFA SS 16X or the 20X both under $400, I have 2 of the 20X and they track perfectly, return to 100yds zero everytime and could be a little brighter. I have used both scopes at several Fclass matches up to 1000yds without any problems.
hope this helps.

 

[jpspeeddemon]

Re: What if tracking is more important than view?

Vortex Viper, mine holds zero and tracks great. I've shot out to 600 and 800 quite a few times and back down to 100, the zero is always there.

 

[ShtrRdy]

Re: What if tracking is more important than view?

Thanks for the info! - Todd