Been seeing a convergence in chassis designs and features lately. Yes, there are some differences, but it looks like many of the chassis designers are looking over the fence at what the other guy is doing.
With both chassis spec'd out the same way, ie C6 buttstock, no folder, thumbrest, NV bridge, etc. Which would you go for and why? Lead time is something that affects us all, an ambidextrous system is nice, does it matter where one is made, MDT costs more, etc.
With both chassis spec'd out the same way, ie C6 buttstock, no folder, thumbrest, NV bridge, etc. Which would you go for and why? Lead time is something that affects us all, an ambidextrous system is nice, does it matter where one is made, MDT costs more, etc.