I have the zeiss 600 and 800 rapid z, like it, like the glass.
I have some swarovski scopes with the regular reticle and, to my eyes the glass is better and so are the adjustments.
I have a "new to me" 7.5 lb. Borden .280 that I plan on using to shoot paper out to 600 yards and to take on hunts( out of the country, sheep or elk).
Is the new brh reticle as easy to use as the zeiss rapid z?
Is the overall quality of the new scopes, probably the lower end z3 or z5 3-10 power enough better than the zeiss to justify it?
Is the swarovski website as easy to use as the zeiss when it comes to figuring ballistics on different rounds?
Thanks
Seeker 120
I have some swarovski scopes with the regular reticle and, to my eyes the glass is better and so are the adjustments.
I have a "new to me" 7.5 lb. Borden .280 that I plan on using to shoot paper out to 600 yards and to take on hunts( out of the country, sheep or elk).
Is the new brh reticle as easy to use as the zeiss rapid z?
Is the overall quality of the new scopes, probably the lower end z3 or z5 3-10 power enough better than the zeiss to justify it?
Is the swarovski website as easy to use as the zeiss when it comes to figuring ballistics on different rounds?
Thanks
Seeker 120