Maggie’s What are you drinking right now!?
- By Marinevet1
- The Bear Pit
- 7812 Replies
Buffalo Trace.........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn................I just I can't rate them by numbers.............#7 is. white as a ghost.......but all fine asses
Look next to the 4th claw print and there is another, most creatures don't have six claw prints either.
Hmmm...looks like a hind landing in on a front to me. Basing that on the pad pattern.
My $0.02 worth... I absolutely would *not* mount any kind of rotary powder thrower directly to the scale. I'd either find or make a thrower stand that sits/mounts off to the side. Throw the charge into the cup, and gently sit the cup on the scale. Or if you must, position the thrower directly over the scale, with a cantilevered arm - but I still *would not* mount it to the scale or the draft shield in any way.
Most powder throwers - in my experience - tend to get 'hung up' or have to 'crunch through' even medium stick powders (Varget/4895/N140/N150/H4350). The only reason the original AutoTrickler got away with using the Lee PPM mounted directly on top of the scale housing was because of the Teflon wipers that particular design employs; it literally *can't* 'cut' kernels like basically any other thrower on the market.
Yep^thats the answer right there
Manual drop into cup, place on sclae, then trickle into cup to top off by whatever means you choose
First. . . note a difference between "accuracy" and "precision":In my quest to maximize accuracy and cartridge equality:
in looking at load data all over the place I have noticed some things:
A. on the same chart, different cup readings for the loads. Por Que?
I assume a full nearly full load will be more accurate than one with an air gap
if a barrel can handle a CUP of 7900 for one load why make one for the same bullet with only 6500?
max velocity is mostly better yes?
Not necessarily. There's different things involved effecting stability of a projectile. In some cases, more velocity may not give the projectile enough time to stabilizes. Though, less flight time reduces the effect any wind will have on the projectile, particularly as distance increases.faster to target, more stability....
If you're after both accuracy and precision, then the focus should be on what you get on target. If you maximizing velocity, you're loading to the max pressure for the particular powder. That can be problematic if you find yourself shooting in conditions that will elevate the pressure or a condition in your chamber that can do that too . . . resulting in changing precision and even accuracy.B. different Initial velocity, with different powders why not maximize velocity at a certain CUP.
Yes.C. different books and sources have different load information for the same cartridge configuration.
I suspect that the numbers on the charts are assembled from different sources, and are not from the same trial or same rifle.
When you choose a particular powder, and you want to work up a good load with as full a cartridge as possible, it's best to run a pressure latter to know where this particular lot of powder begins to have pressure signs for the projectile being used at a particular seating depth. Once you know where the max is for your cartridges in your particular gun, you can then start working up a safe load, starting low and working up to find a load that's accurate with precision.Is there a way to know what the maximum safe CUP is for loads with different powders?, do yall just keep increasing the load till you get ejection and primer deformation then back down a little? or get a full case?
You don't have to fill to exactly at the bottom of the bullet (100% fill). Having a fill as low as 95% can work just as well. The trick is finding a powder that can give you a good fill (like 95% or better), AND . . . will also be completely burned by the time the projectile leaves the muzzle.to eliminate variables I try to fill my case to the bottom of the bullet without any compression or minimal.
per "white house official" sound like more bullshit, but i suppose it is possible.
I got one of these scopes a month ago or so, in like new condition, and put it on my 22LR rifle as a placeholder while I figure out a more ideal optic for it. I think I will put it on my AR, as it's a great mag range for an SPR.
Initially I was a little unimpressed with the eyebox, and I will say it's not excellent, but I also had it mounted too far back, and once I moved it forward one slot it's much easier to acquire (so user error there). It is a little tighter at 10x than I wish it was, but it's still pretty easy to pick up and retain, at least with the low recoil of 22LR. I think with 223 it'll still be fine as long as you're not trying to take quick shots at max mag.
The dials are very solid, great positive clicks with no mush to speak of. Truly impressive at this price range. The parallax knob is quite stiff but nice that it won't get bumped. I'm not worried about bumping elevation or windage at a match but maybe slinging it over my back while hunting would be a different story. Depends on your hunting scenario and if you have time to check your dials before taking a shot.
Color is pretty decent, though I haven't shot it in dim lighting to know how bright or dark the image is in those conditions. It's plenty sharp at all ends of the magnification range. It does get a little soft towards the edges when at lower mag, but that's field curvature for you. When parallax is adjusted all the way down at low magnification, there is significant barrel distortion, with a "rolling ball" effect. This pretty much doesn't affect me because the reticle is pretty unusable at min mag and I'll be do any close up shooting with a top mounted red dot anyway.
At 25yd parallax and 8x there is very little to complain about. The depth of field is pretty shallow for close objects if your parallax isn't set within 5-10 yards, when zoomed further than 6x, but around 10x the parallax is surprisingly forgiving for longer ranges... everything from 75 to 400 yards is mostly in focus with parallax set to 100 yards. Very usable for quick shooting if you like the deep depth of field.
Overall I'm pretty pleased with the scope! The gen3 additions with the scope caps and sun shield are nice quality of life improvements at no extra charge. Yes, the scope is a little long, but I think it pays off in performance. If you like the 2.5-15x zoom range of this optic, and are looking for something focused on precision (and thus will like the fine, detailed reticle), this is one of the best options on the market IMO.
Maybe they were counting on having so many bikini clad wimens on the lower deck, it would have been enough ballast to be stable.5 feet below the waterline, 25 feet above. Who couldn’t have seen that one coming?