Well then it takes a real retard to believe their one experience is consistent with an entire line of alpha glass.
- Thread starter KevinWood44
- Start date
I never said NF had tracking issues. Tracking error isn’t the same as tracking issues.
As for that 5-25, it’s a Beast, so maybe they had better glass than the 5-25 ATACR.
Its relative to what your value is based on. I like Kahles 6x24 Scopes, I have (2) and they work every time. I have (2) ZCO and think they are fantastic.
Shit like oh I hit a mile with a gen 3 is like saying you hit a mile with a 6br, bug deal, can it be done ,yes. Gen 3 turrets suck
Shit like oh I hit a mile with a gen 3 is like saying you hit a mile with a 6br, bug deal, can it be done ,yes. Gen 3 turrets suck
Fixed it for you. I was snickering, otherwise. It gave me a totally different mental image.
Damned auto-correct.
Yes, true. Margin is a percentage of income and mark-up is a percentage of production costs. So, yes, different companies can have different margins and different mark-ups. Both are talking about money collected.
Seriously, I have no problem admitting lack of knowledge and I learn something every day. What is the difference between tracking error and tracking issues in rifle scopes? I searched a bit and only found articles in investment portfolios. A tracking issue would a problem and a tracking error would be the specific result of that tracking issue.
But I don't know if that relates to this discussion.
Earnings before interest and taxes - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This thread turned into a CF just like the title suggested it would.
Fine, let me expand then. I have never liked the image more than any other reasonably equivalent scope on the firing line when looking through them on various others rifles at matches. Equivalent others I refer to being a 1500 and up scope be it atacr, razor, k525, and even xtrs and cronus.
So to see if I could change my opinion, because I really wanted to like them like you seem to, I spent two solid days with one trying to like it on my own rifle and still didnt. The not seeing a target like that was just the most poignant example. Its not just one experience, Id call it one extended experience and lots of little other ones.
As to the not a fluke comment, the owner was placing high in two days with it before I borrowed it and went right back to it after, so I doubt that single scope was an issue.
So because I havent liked them ever, to me they are the worst value.
Yep. I guess these NF fanboys think that every scope they make is perfect. The fact of the matter is there is a thing called “within spec”.
As for thinking that every model of a certain scope has the same quality glass is pure fantasy. Go look through an early serial number nx8, and a current one side by side. Night and day difference.
I’ve owned dozens of NF glass, and still have half if them. I don’t have to guess.
Sounds like the defect is you. You have a non servicable optical system in your head.
If you seriously cannot tell the difference between all the optics listed, then you have no place giving anyone advise IMO. Even my buddies who do not like ZCO for whatever reason, would never say the glass is on par with garbage like a cronus or kahles. Then again they also aren't blind.
"Could you Please continue the petty bickering, I find it most intriguing." - Cmdr. Data
Another thought to stir up shit and invite histrionic tirades. As mentioned before, I had doubts about tiborsaurus rex when he found the Arken to fare better at not having sun glare than the S&B. I know he is an affiliate of Arken, which means he does get compensation.
However, I am not an expert in optics by any one's definition and maybe he was right. I don't have an S&B to look through.
He is also a better shot than I am. He is in that industry and I am not.
What if Rex was right and the S&B shows glare but the Arken does not? Does that mean that the Arken is performing better in that regard? And does that fit into the trope of expensive scopes not being worth the money paid?
And now, I shall await the "ridicule" and attempt to "shame" for asking such a stupid question that highlights how stupid I am. To give myself credit, my first post in this forum is where I first stated that I would be the stupidest person here. And so far, I have proven myself correct on that.
However, I am not an expert in optics by any one's definition and maybe he was right. I don't have an S&B to look through.
He is also a better shot than I am. He is in that industry and I am not.
What if Rex was right and the S&B shows glare but the Arken does not? Does that mean that the Arken is performing better in that regard? And does that fit into the trope of expensive scopes not being worth the money paid?
And now, I shall await the "ridicule" and attempt to "shame" for asking such a stupid question that highlights how stupid I am. To give myself credit, my first post in this forum is where I first stated that I would be the stupidest person here. And so far, I have proven myself correct on that.
I have a variety of “good” scopes from an old USO SN3, a couple of 4-16 PM2s, a 5-20 US SB, ZCO, March, a Bushnell XRS2 and a bunch of LRHSs (I put the Bushnells in because I really can’t fault them).
Scopes that weren’t “worth it” to me were any of the older NXS NF scopes, I’ve had a few and found the glass average, a Gen 1 Vortex PST4-16 and a Burris XTRii, glass was pretty awful on both also.
Oh and a Steiner Military 3-12x50. Felt like you could bash in tent pegs with it, but after about 400 rounds of .308 it literally fell to pieces and had to be sent back.
Scopes that weren’t “worth it” to me were any of the older NXS NF scopes, I’ve had a few and found the glass average, a Gen 1 Vortex PST4-16 and a Burris XTRii, glass was pretty awful on both also.
Oh and a Steiner Military 3-12x50. Felt like you could bash in tent pegs with it, but after about 400 rounds of .308 it literally fell to pieces and had to be sent back.
I remember a time I asked if nightforce rings should fit in the pic rail a little tighter. It turned into a several page attack. Lol. People are passionate about their brands, wether it’s from justification on money spent or years of being a loyal fan. One thing is sure, people getting extremely upset of opinions on an Internet forum reveals a lot about the mental state of the sport. It’s hilarious really, but also sad seeing the elitist eat their own over some opinions. Feels like junior high all over again.
Exactly my thought. For a thread designed to aggravate and initiate conflict, it’s impressive. Never would have lasted past two pages years ago.
Rex is right.
Some people like to trash talk about him but reality is he's a far better shooter and more knowledgeable than 99% of the people on this forum.
People don't like to admit it that their $4000 scope gets bested by a $500 one but it's just a fact.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
Go be butt hurt somewhere else.
There is one in particular in this thread that gets pretty emotional about things here. Kind of wonder what his mental state is?
Some people on here have the social skills of a feral cat. Coupled with the egotistical behavior thinking of not ever being wrong doesn’t help at all.
It's really sad and disturbing at the same time. No matter how good you are you should always be a student of your craft, always learning, listening, and improving. I also don't understand animosity toward the "poors" here and in many other forums from the George Soros wana-be's.
It's almost like they're wanting this to become just a rich man's hobby, but let's hope they don't get their wish because then there will be a minority supporting the 2nd Amendment and it will go away fast.
Those minorities are quick to respond because they want everyone to know they bought xyz scope and have to scream it from the rooftops. They don’t seem like a minority because they post about it every chance they get so it seems like a popular opinion, but in reality it one or two people posting about it a lot. And if you criticize it, then they come unglued and find like minded, albeit narrow minded folks to grab the pitchforks and lanterns. Lol
Only a 2x winner of the internet? Oh well, we all start somewhere.
My comments about “the Poors” are simply in jest, even though I am no longer one of them, I still have plenty of Poors items in my safe.
Most of the time, when I joke about “They Poors” it’s more to do with hating on the item itself being shitty or cheap, not necessarily the person who bought it.
Only a 2x winner of the internet? Oh well, we all start somewhere.
Having owned both scopes I do not agree Arken controls glare better than S&B. Arken is a good looking scope that is not good to look through. That about sums it up.
So it's like Tarus firearms- decent looking on the outside and low priced- but basically low quality products.
I mean there’s no lying: Tangent Theta or Schmidt or ZCO are poor value, but Nightforce is even poorer value.
There's always been a portion of the gun/hunting community that wants it to be an exclusive club only open to middle-aged rich fucks and their preppie kids.
Those people are usually democrats or NIMBY RINOs.
Owns a ZCO, still has a mortgage, still has a car payment, has little to no saved for retirement, a poor?
Owns an Arken, paid off house, paid off car, one million dollars in a retirement account, a poor?
-Stan
Owns an Arken, paid off house, paid off car, one million dollars in a retirement account, a poor?
-Stan
Stan live today or live tomorrow. Just don’t forget to live.
Owns a whole bunch of beta level scopes, one S&B, a few under $700 scopes and the rifles to put under all of them. Paid off older cars, house with smallish $ on it, and living off a retirement account that was 40% bigger before Jingo Joe etal decided it was time for them to cash in. A poor.
And proud of it.
If a $500 scope is better than a $4000 why doesn't EVERY shooter save the $3500 and put it towards a rifle? a few more "better" $500 scopes? Or spend $3k on strippers and whiskey? You think brand loyalty is THAT blinding that people would piss away $3500??
Quoting Ben Shapiro does not make as smart as Ben Shapiro.
And Rex is a good shooter but his opinion was also BOUGHT by Arken for the price of a free scope and a promo code. THAT is a fact....not caring about your feelings or his.
Whoa whoa who said you could come in here and talk shit??
Of course it is. It’s a click bait topic, intended to create controversy and posts. Looks like it worked to me.
No there isn't. You are projecting the scary bad guys and making shit up. The same mentality as people going on about how their $500 chicom trash is comparable to Schmidt, zco, TT, ect. Strait up delusional
It's almost like we all didn't start at the same place and bought all the cheap shit mentioned only to learn that the shit is cheap for a reason. Sorry you are a decade or two behind the curve. Maybe in 2040 you can come back and bestow upon us some actual wisdom based on experience.
Yea why didn't we think of that. Time to sell 3 zco and buy 20 Arkens. Only a a fucking idiot spends more than $500 on a scope.
There are people who are poor when you least expect it. Like dingbat who bought a Cadillac but could not afford the extra dollars to have turn signals installed. I mean, they would use them if they had them, right?My comments about “the Poors” are simply in jest, even though I am no longer one of them, I still have plenty of Poors items in my safe.
Most of the time, when I joke about “They Poors” it’s more to do with hating on the item itself being shitty or cheap, not necessarily the person who bought it.
Yes, but I must inform you, in case you didn't know, people here cannot go a day without berating and cursing and insulting each other and it helps to have something to focus on, such as scopes, pun totally and completely intended.
Similar threads
