• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

Save the Earth "Rabbit Hole"

Hobo Hilton

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Jun 4, 2011
12,411
12,153
73
Pacific Northwest
Why are we attempting to save the Earth?
Who are we saving it for?
Is it working, or just one more misguided crusade?
Bottom line, who pays for this?
_________________________________________
Up to a trillion dollars in subsidies for low-carbon energy and related infrastructure are up for grabs amid the Biden administration’s push to transform the U.S. economy. The grabbing has already begun. European Union officials made a lot of noise earlier this year when European companies began making expansion plans for the U.S. in a bid to take part in the incentive race.

Now, towns and counties in the U.S. are also eyeing a piece of the incentive pie, by seeking to attract low-carbon projects. One such project, the Wall Street Journal reported recently, is Kontrolmatik Technologies’ battery plant, to be built in South Carolina, with the Turkish company eyeing up to $1 billion in federal tax credits over the next ten years.

 
Listen to the “ dirty green energy “ series from The President’s Daily Briefing podcast.

It will give enough info to form a nice little picture on part of your question.

Also see who is dumping money into China.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hobo Hilton
Oh and it has nothing to do with saving the earth.

It is Marxism wrapped in cute polar bears and rising ocean fear porn. Arisen from the ashes of 1989 when the USSR and communism collapsed… and all the little commies (especially those in academia and the media) had to regroup and find a new way to package their failed ideology.

The answer… first promulgated by the German Green Party was to hijack the environmental movement… by infiltrating it and taking it over.

After that, they took over the Democrat party.

It’s all about wealth redistribution and destroying capitalism, not about saving the planet.

Otherwise someone “might” be complaining about China and other third world countries raping the planet. Oh, but that would be racist. Another Marxist/Leninist tactic.

Read Crichton’s “State of Fear” from c. 2000 as he lays it out better than I can!

Sirhr
 
Oh and it has nothing to do with saving the earth.

It is Marxism wrapped in cute polar bears and rising ocean fear porn. Arisen from the ashes of 1989 when the USSR and communism collapsed… and all the little commies (especially those in academia and the media) had to regroup and find a new way to package their failed ideology.

The answer… first promulgated by the German Green Party was to hijack the environmental movement… by infiltrating it and taking it over.

After that, they took over the Democrat party.

It’s all about wealth redistribution and destroying capitalism, not about saving the planet.

Otherwise someone “might” be complaining about China and other third world countries raping the planet. Oh, but that would be racist. Another Marxist/Leninist tactic.

Read Crichton’s “State of Fear” from c. 2000 as he lays it out better than I can!

Sirhr
Marxism and/or the green movement are just a re-branding of eugenics.
 
-because it is literally the only place humans can live
-ourselves
-no
-we all do
 
We work hard in Wyoming to rid our state of carbon, pulling it out of the ground a hundred tons at a time and exporting it by the train load, and we also put pipelines all over to move the liquid carbon out of here too. Other states should try it.
 
-because it is literally the only place humans can live
-ourselves
-no
-we all do

They're taking all your tax dollars and moving the pollution to China and India.

They're not actually making any difference, they just want you to catch the feels so you don't mind losing our economy while bolstering our enemies economy.
 
They're taking all your tax dollars and moving the pollution to China and India.

They're not actually making any difference, they just want you to catch the feels so you don't mind losing our economy while bolstering our enemies economy.
Yeah I didn’t read the article. I just answered the questions.
 
I had dinner last year with two retired mathematical biologists who are among the top in the world. They had a good laugh over CO2 and what they thought back in the 90s. They have completely changed their minds. Their argument was this.

The bottom of the food chain is plants and they need CO2.

The Earth is dying due to lack of CO2 and the efficacy of weathering and the life-driven carbon sinks. This is combined with the gradual loss of atmospheric mass over time.

Unless volcanism ramps back up on the million year timescale, adding to the atmosphere, life is doomed. They think it won't. We'll end up like Mars.

The question is now what level of CO2 should we as humans strive to set? its not 400ppm but something like 800 or higher. But they don't see a way to combat the slow decline of the atmospheric mass.

Here is a pretty good and vetted article on the general questions.

 
The fucking chicoms want to put a battery plant in my town. Import 300 or so Chinese to run the place, so I've heard.
 
I had dinner last year with two retired mathematical biologists who are among the top in the world. They had a good laugh over CO2 and what they thought back in the 90s. They have completely changed their minds. Their argument was this.

The bottom of the food chain is plants and they need CO2.

The Earth is dying due to lack of CO2 and the efficacy of weathering and the life-driven carbon sinks. This is combined with the gradual loss of atmospheric mass over time.

Unless volcanism ramps back up on the million year timescale, adding to the atmosphere, life is doomed. They think it won't. We'll end up like Mars.

The question is now what level of CO2 should we as humans strive to set? its not 400ppm but something like 800 or higher. But they don't see a way to combat the slow decline of the atmospheric mass.

Here is a pretty good and vetted article on the general questions.


The earth is much greener now than it has been in the last 30-40 years.
 
I had dinner last year with two retired mathematical biologists who are among the top in the world. They had a good laugh over CO2 and what they thought back in the 90s. They have completely changed their minds. Their argument was this.

The bottom of the food chain is plants and they need CO2.

The Earth is dying due to lack of CO2 and the efficacy of weathering and the life-driven carbon sinks. This is combined with the gradual loss of atmospheric mass over time.

Unless volcanism ramps back up on the million year timescale, adding to the atmosphere, life is doomed. They think it won't. We'll end up like Mars.

The question is now what level of CO2 should we as humans strive to set? its not 400ppm but something like 800 or higher. But they don't see a way to combat the slow decline of the atmospheric mass.

Here is a pretty good and vetted article on the general questions.


Okay I have to ask:

What is a mathmatical biologist? I've worked with many individuals from different scientific fields and I have yet to hear of this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bullfrog08
The planet will survive. Mankind's days are numbered.

At this point, if God told me, "When you think it's gone on long enough, hit the switch," we ain't eating it to lunch today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 101st and Cowpokey
I think I'm going to start a new field as well and give it a fancy name. Theoretical Phalangical Friction Modeling- the study of friction on the phalanges with and without lubricant during aggressive masterbation.

I look forward to avoiding it at all cost.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AngryKoala