• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Hunting & Fishing Ethical Hunting Range

Awesymoto

Awesymoto outdoors
Full Member
Minuteman
Jan 5, 2011
222
55
34
Eye da hoe
sites.google.com
This may stir some up some dookie but lets talk about long range hunting, and personal limitations.

I've read so many field and stream and other magazine articles that are bashing long range hunting these days and I can see why. I'm not going to get into the "technological ethics" of hunting because quite frankly I bow hunt and still in no way shape or form is bowhunting more "fair" to game. I'm launching a carbon fiber shaft arrow at over 200 mph with razor sharp blades at the front end. All while wearing camouflage that humans have engineered to trick animals. Hunting is not fair to game period no matter the range unless you are tacking an animal with your hands and hulk hogan choking it to death.

With AR500 steel targets selling like hotcakes everybody is soaking up long range shooting and I think that is great, however what shooters need to understand is long range shooting is not hunting! The thrill from a hunt after days of tracking an animal and finally getting an opportunity to shoot can't be matched when shooting at steel, and your nerves are wonderful at messing things up. On top of that while hunting out west we have been hiking miles, through canyons, up mountains, and all in between while carrying a full load of crap on our back. The biggest difference is when hunting many times you get 1 shot. ONE. Shot placement while hunting is critical, as lungs and the pump are what were going for (or Shoulder DRT). There is no: Bang, up 1.2 left 2.0 bang ding! It's Bang, F****K and now you shot an animal in the guts, blew a leg off, or hit it in the nose (happened to a friend). Now I get that things happen and we all miss, but lets address our personal limitations prior to hunting to mitigate that.

So here is the discussion, how do you all train, and limit yourselves?
Just like a DOPE book, I go out and record the weather conditions mentally when I practice. I have a 10" steel plate that I use in place of game vitals. Now i know it's bigger than deer vitals but for Elk and Bear its just about spot on. The 1st shot out of my gun cold bore, whatever the range is what matters to me, I hit or miss, I don't blame that my kestrel is off and needs tuning, or that oops I read the wind wrong, HIT OR MISS.. Assuming a hit i'll follow up and place 4 more for a group of 5. Whatever the range is that I miss that sucker in any of those shots then i'm past my personal LONGEST limit, in that I will not shoot past that. It does not mean I will shoot TO that range. If i go 5 for 5 i'll consider it acceptable under similar conditions to shoot to. For example
I went 5x5 at 994 yards with my 28 Nosler cold. I feel comfortable if given a perfect shot under similar conditions: prone, day, little wind <4mph of taking the same shot on an elk knowing I'll have a good chance at hitting it where I need to.
Lets say I missed at 700 when the winds are whippin'. Well I won't shoot at 700 then if the winds are bad when hunting but I may shoot to 900 in good conditions! My personal limit is not static, it's dynamic, something that I feel hunters don't fully get unless they shoot a lot. Too often I hear at elk or deer camp i'll shoot to 400 yards. I ask okay under what conditions? Often they say something like "i was shooting at the range at 400...." or they just look puzzled.

NOW this still doesn't take into effect energy required for proper terminal bullet performance. I shoot the Hornady ELDX 175 7mm in my 28 Nosler, and I limit myself to 1800fps as per their website advertisement for proper expansion. Shooting a Berger would be different and so would a Nosler bullet.

Nor does this consider game recovery. Often times large game doesn't DRT. If its wide open and I can visually track the animal for hundreds of yards (like the flats of AZ) I will be more willing to shoot an animal at further range, than if the animal is right by a ridge it could go over full of vegitation.
ALSO just finding where the animal was when you shot it can be a B***H if your hunting in non linear terrain with elevation. Bushes look different when you go down a ridge, the sun is setting and your desperately trying to figure out where that Bull standing when it was shot ONLY 400 yards away.

Back to my process, 5 hits for 5 shots 10" plate. I do this at the start of every shooting session months prior to the season and continue to do this as often as life allows up until its tag time. The entire time I'm logging what conditions are in my head to establish not only my limits, but my equipments limitations as well! (kestrel, optics, ammo)

During the hunt prior to any shot I think about recovery and how likely it is to recover that sucker at the range and location i'm at.

.02 cents and I feel obligated to share after hearing my younger hunting pals come back eating tag soup after wounding elk in Colorado, or deer in MN. What do you guys do?
 
I "hunt" Deer in GA. I wouldn't call it hunting. Deer behaviour is super predictable if you only have to within a kilometer of them. It might as well be grocery shopping.

There isn't much skill to it. I can go to a large open field about 2 hours before dusk, take a nap, and then shoot a doe with a high powered rifle. I can easily "laze and blaze" anything out to a 700 yards; I can probably go further with the 300WM. I would have easily reached my bag limit this year by just using that method.

I don't even hunt out of a tree stand, ground blind, or over a feeder. I don't have the money for them.

I can understand the skill of getting an animal with a bow or close ranged weapon. It takes a lot more effort when you are trying to be within 25 yards of where your prey is going to travel, and it definitely requires more discipline to be good at it. Especially if you are waiting for 1 specific animal.

I actually think the most fun I've had hunting is spot and stalk pig hunting in a swamp with my bow. Getting into the middle of a heard of pigs is brutally satisfying.
 
I think it's a dynamic answer for most of us . Conditions dictate the range of an ethical shot for me . It could be 900 or 200 depending on 1.4 million different variables that come into play .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Awesymoto
Depends on the animal too. Most would feel a lot worse about a bad hit on a elk than on a wood chuck. Still for me it has to come down to the hunters choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Awesymoto
OP summed it up well. Effective/ethical range limit is dynamic and unique to the situation and person. That’s the biggest thing for people to gain the wisdom to realize in the real world.
Atmospheric conditions. Available light. Terrain. Shot placement and terminal ballistics depending on size and toughness of the game animal. Even the physical or mental state of the hunter.
I recall a time or two getting chilled in the damp cold winter wind, eyes watering, fatigued, reflexes a little slow, thinking there’s no way I’m up for anything beyond a close gimme shot.
Clint Eastwood quotes apply well here. Are you just feeling lucky or do you know “your” limitations.
I’ll add, practicing aim/holding on actual game animals as they move about in the manner specific to them gives a good idea as well for what ones limitations are. Are you close or steady enough or is that particular animal just to active to hold still long enough at a given distance?
Only one person can answer those questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Awesymoto
I wrote this a while back, applies to the OP's points: "A wise shooter, will always keep within his known realm of proficiency. But an even wiser shooter will recognize that his realm changes with atmosphere and weather. Keeping your finger in the air like a weak a politician, and paying close attention to what is happening around you, will go a long way towards letting you know when to shoot, or more importantly when not to shoot. "

The whole thing can be read here: High Tech Hunting
 
Last edited:
I live in Central NY, and deer hunt in the ADK. I couldnt think of getting a shot past 200yards. Its all about character, and ethics of the hunter. Thats what separates a true hunter, and just some idiot in the woods looking to fill a tag.
 
I live in Central NY, and deer hunt in the ADK. I couldnt think of getting a shot past 200yards. Its all about character, and ethics of the hunter. Thats what separates a true hunter, and just some idiot in the woods looking to fill a tag.

"true hunter" is a bit misleading. What you are most likely implying as idealized is someone hunting for sport and pleasure following a set of guidelines in order to kill an animal with minimal suffering.

In other times, places or peoples, a "true hunter" might be someone who by any means needed brings back food of some sort to their starving family/village/tribe.
 
I like what I'm hearing. Makes me feel good knowing there's responsible people representing outdoorsman.

For what it's worth for those "purists" (not calling anyone out here but have heard the argument) I have yet to tag a deer with a rifle ever... and I have tried many times, doe doe doe doe doe no bucks... but went back to back 2017 Dec 28th and 2018 Jan 1 over the counter, bow mule deer bucks in AZ no blinds no stands just me, binos, a bow and good friends. Hunting with a bow isn't always that much harder once you realize 40 yards is a lot to work with if you know how to play it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RNWRKNP
coldboremiracle's graphic is on point. There are variables to consider...however, the most important variable and most heavily weighted one at that, is 'YOUR' limit in each scenario. It's like in Archery. Many people get blasted for shooting past 40 or 50 yards, but they're being blasted by some people who shouldn't even be allowed to shoot any living critter with a bow, at any yardage, period. Some people are proficient out to 100 yards with archery equipment, some people aren't proficient out to 30 yards. One needs to go no further than an archery range to witness what I mean. The problem lies in someone not being honest with themselves. Not knowing "THEIR" limit, and their limit has nothing to do with the limit of someone else. Archery, rifle, whatever, if you're in a position to shoot at something you must ask yourself... Have I made this shot before? Am I capable of making this shot? Have a made an equally difficult shot before? Am I proficient at this range? If the answer to these questions seems always fall under the umbrella of "no"...then it is not ethical for you to take that shot. But the guy behind you, may have just killed an animal 2 weeks ago at that range, in those conditions, he may practice that situation...it is within HIS ethical limits.
 
I consider long distance shooting from a slightly different perspective. Taking for granted that the hunter is capable of the shot, conditions are good, recovery of the animal is highly probably, my reason for considering long range shots to not be ethical (for me) is the flight time of the bullet. A 500 yard shot for a 180 gr. Hornady SST in 300 WM will be about 0.58 seconds. Add to that the ~0.2 seconds of neural network time from when the hunter decides to pull the trigger to when the signal is implemented by the finger and you have a lot of time for the animal to move AFTER the hunter commands the trigger to be pulled. A startled animal could literally move from out in front of the shot and a calm animal walk out of a shoulder kill shot into a gut shot. At 1000 yards, you are looking at over 1.5 seconds total time.

So it is a judgment call on shooting at such distances. You can watch animal behavior and assess whether or not the animal is about to move. It isn't 100%, but if you know your quarry, your probability of a correct assessment of its immediate future behavior is better than if you don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RNWRKNP
The way I see it, there are a lot of variables involved. What gets me the most is when someone says 400 yards is unethical but there are people that have no business shooting at 50 yards. Many of the people judging are the ones that shoot their gun once or twice a year at the animal they are trying to kill. I know someone that shot and wounded a deer at less than 80 yards and made a poor attempt to find it. I was told it was an 8 point but by the game camera pics it was a big 9 point I was watching. That one probably died somewhere in the timber, a few days later he shot and missed another buck at the same distance. Then he managed to get a chance at the giant buck I had been watching on camera that same day. It took two shots for him to kill it. I think it had 16 or 17 points on it. My point is some people that want to limit what distance we shoot at shouldn't even be allowed to hunt. I imagine those shots were around 40-50 yards with a centerfire rifle but 80 is the max distance he could have shot it in the location he hunted.

Nothing pisses me off more than those that don't even practice or sight in their rifle.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20170929-193556.png
    Screenshot_20170929-193556.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 79
I don't consider myself a hunter anymore. I have no desire to waste anymore of my time trying to sneak up on an animal just for the sake of doing it...just to say I was "hunting". That is why I don't sling sticks at animals either.

I am however a responsible game harvester. I have passed up 200 yard shots with a 30-06, and I have taken shots at 500-700 yards (successfully) with that same 30-06. Hell, I shot a deer with a 2 inch, 38 Special snubby when it walked under my stand. In each instance, the conditions, shooting position and my prior experience dictated whether the shot was doable.

This subject is akin to "what is the best caliber?" and "what is the best scope?" There is no right answer.
 
I find it interesting how we assign higher values to the deer and elk than we do the coyote on the run or the prairie dog we just can't help trying at 800. Is it really a question of true humane ethics, or is it something else?
It's a question of intrinsic value for me. I can eat a deer. I can't (won't) eat a coyote. Elk and moose are more valuable than deer because there are fewer of them and there is more meat to go to waste (that is for me anyway, wolves and bear will make sure it doesn't actually go to waste). It isn't anything to do with animal suffering for me. Any death I give an animal will be kinder than it will suffer in the wild.

When I was hunting back east, the deer were so over populated that I really didn't sweat it if one went unrecovered. You got 6 deer with your tag anyway, and extra tags were sold over the counter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deersniper
I find it interesting how we assign higher values to the deer and elk than we do the coyote on the run or the prairie dog we just can't help trying at 800. Is it really a question of true humane ethics, or is it something else?

Always wondered that myself, I don't really see the difference. A life is a life in that aspect but people seem to value a game animal more than a varmint. A crippling shot is going to make the animal suffer regardless of what it is. It's ok in some peoples eyes to blow the jaw off a coyote trying to take a head shot but how dare you do that to a whitetail lol. Never understood that double standard either.
 
This may stir some up some dookie but lets talk about long range hunting, and personal limitations.

I've read so many field and stream and other magazine articles that are bashing long range hunting these days and I can see why. I'm not going to get into the "technological ethics" of hunting because quite frankly I bow hunt and still in no way shape or form is bowhunting more "fair" to game. I'm launching a carbon fiber shaft arrow at over 200 mph with razor sharp blades at the front end. All while wearing camouflage that humans have engineered to trick animals. Hunting is not fair to game period no matter the range unless you are tacking an animal with your hands and hulk hogan choking it to death.

With AR500 steel targets selling like hotcakes everybody is soaking up long range shooting and I think that is great, however what shooters need to understand is long range shooting is not hunting! The thrill from a hunt after days of tracking an animal and finally getting an opportunity to shoot can't be matched when shooting at steel, and your nerves are wonderful at messing things up. On top of that while hunting out west we have been hiking miles, through canyons, up mountains, and all in between while carrying a full load of crap on our back. The biggest difference is when hunting many times you get 1 shot. ONE. Shot placement while hunting is critical, as lungs and the pump are what were going for (or Shoulder DRT). There is no: Bang, up 1.2 left 2.0 bang ding! It's Bang, F****K and now you shot an animal in the guts, blew a leg off, or hit it in the nose (happened to a friend). Now I get that things happen and we all miss, but lets address our personal limitations prior to hunting to mitigate that.

So here is the discussion, how do you all train, and limit yourselves?
Just like a DOPE book, I go out and record the weather conditions mentally when I practice. I have a 10" steel plate that I use in place of game vitals. Now i know it's bigger than deer vitals but for Elk and Bear its just about spot on. The 1st shot out of my gun cold bore, whatever the range is what matters to me, I hit or miss, I don't blame that my kestrel is off and needs tuning, or that oops I read the wind wrong, HIT OR MISS.. Assuming a hit i'll follow up and place 4 more for a group of 5. Whatever the range is that I miss that sucker in any of those shots then i'm past my personal LONGEST limit, in that I will not shoot past that. It does not mean I will shoot TO that range. If i go 5 for 5 i'll consider it acceptable under similar conditions to shoot to. For example
I went 5x5 at 994 yards with my 28 Nosler cold. I feel comfortable if given a perfect shot under similar conditions: prone, day, little wind <4mph of taking the same shot on an elk knowing I'll have a good chance at hitting it where I need to.
Lets say I missed at 700 when the winds are whippin'. Well I won't shoot at 700 then if the winds are bad when hunting but I may shoot to 900 in good conditions! My personal limit is not static, it's dynamic, something that I feel hunters don't fully get unless they shoot a lot. Too often I hear at elk or deer camp i'll shoot to 400 yards. I ask okay under what conditions? Often they say something like "i was shooting at the range at 400...." or they just look puzzled.

NOW this still doesn't take into effect energy required for proper terminal bullet performance. I shoot the Hornady ELDX 175 7mm in my 28 Nosler, and I limit myself to 1800fps as per their website advertisement for proper expansion. Shooting a Berger would be different and so would a Nosler bullet.

Nor does this consider game recovery. Often times large game doesn't DRT. If its wide open and I can visually track the animal for hundreds of yards (like the flats of AZ) I will be more willing to shoot an animal at further range, than if the animal is right by a ridge it could go over full of vegitation.
ALSO just finding where the animal was when you shot it can be a B***H if your hunting in non linear terrain with elevation. Bushes look different when you go down a ridge, the sun is setting and your desperately trying to figure out where that Bull standing when it was shot ONLY 400 yards away.

Back to my process, 5 hits for 5 shots 10" plate. I do this at the start of every shooting session months prior to the season and continue to do this as often as life allows up until its tag time. The entire time I'm logging what conditions are in my head to establish not only my limits, but my equipments limitations as well! (kestrel, optics, ammo)

During the hunt prior to any shot I think about recovery and how likely it is to recover that sucker at the range and location i'm at.

.02 cents and I feel obligated to share after hearing my younger hunting pals come back eating tag soup after wounding elk in Colorado, or deer in MN. What do you guys do?
Not to mention how much more gruesome a bow kill is, because there is very little shock from an arrow, and it's all cutting and exsanguination. I've hit many deer perfectly and still had them run more than 100 yds leaving a superhighway slick of the bright red stuff. When I got to the animal it looked like someone had taken several pitchers of blood and poured them over the animal from head to foot. Anti-gun morons who think bow hunting is more humane, sporting, etc. haven't a clue what they're talking about! Still, about the most fun you can have with your pants on!

I hunt Missouri for deer. Heavily forested rolling hills. I hardly ever hunt a spot where even a scope is necessary. I mostly use a .35 Rem, LA with iron sights that drops them DRT. When I travel for elk hunting or antelope if I can see it with my naked eye it's easily an ethical shot for me. I have shot some pretty big bucks and bulls. I haven't felt buck fever for a very long time. I am more nervous on deck for a PRS skills stage than I am with a big animal in my reticle, but obviously my opinion of "ethical" changes with the weather...;)
 
Always wondered that myself, I don't really see the difference. A life is a life in that aspect but people seem to value a game animal more than a varmint. A crippling shot is going to make the animal suffer regardless of what it is. It's ok in some peoples eyes to blow the jaw off a coyote trying to take a head shot but how dare you do that to a whitetail lol. Never understood that double standard either.

I duck hunted for decades before finally ending the costly addiction. It always struck me as odd that the same guys who would say to never shoot a deer on the run would give you shit for shooting a duck slowly paddling around the decoys instead of flushing it for a sporting wing shot.
 
I've hunted deer and filled my tags in Central NY, and honestly, I never got an opportunity at a shot beyond 100yd, if that. I'm done, I'm not able to handle the physical aspect; with complete honestly, I'm physically toast. If I did still try, I'd probably pass up anything beyond 60yd. That's because here, I'd be on my own retrieving a kill, I hunted with a large group of family hunters in NY and that's not happening here in AZ.

I refuse to criticize other hunters for the ethical choices they make. If their consciences are clear, I have no business disagreeing.

Can I still hit a target at respectable distance? Yes; but from now on they all will be inanimate targets. Unless they're shooting at me.

Greg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blutroop
OP stated it very well. Situation dictates ethical or unethical more than distance. If you can make a good shot then that's ethical. People will probably cry, but I've encouraged my wife to take a head shot on an elk and I've killed elk with head shots. All were perfectly "ethical" shots for the situation at the time.
 
I find it interesting how we assign higher values to the deer and elk than we do the coyote on the run or the prairie dog we just can't help trying at 800. Is it really a question of true humane ethics, or is it something else?
Yup people think nothing of long shots on predators. A wolf/coyote/fox gets a lot more respect from me over a long legged disease carrying overpopulated crop eating car destroying rat.
Don't have much respect for hunters that vote to destroy private property rights either.
 
Yup people think nothing of long shots on predators. A wolf/coyote/fox gets a lot more respect from me over a long legged disease carrying overpopulated crop eating car destroying rat.
Don't have much respect for hunters that vote to destroy private property rights either.

Any death we deliver to an animal through hunting is going to be more humane than Mother Nature will give them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fig and W54/XM-388
It's a question of intrinsic value for me. I can eat a deer. I can't (won't) eat a coyote. Elk and moose are more valuable than deer because there are fewer of them and there is more meat to go to waste (that is for me anyway, wolves and bear will make sure it doesn't actually go to waste). It isn't anything to do with animal suffering for me. Any death I give an animal will be kinder than it will suffer in the wild.

When I was hunting back east, the deer were so over populated that I really didn't sweat it if one went unrecovered. You got 6 deer with your tag anyway, and extra tags were sold over the counter.

If you take the shot on an animal, it's your responsibility to recover it no matter what. You wound an animal and don't or can't recover it, your tag is punched.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RNWRKNP
If you take the shot on an animal, it's your responsibility to recover it no matter what. You wound an animal and don't or can't recover it, your tag is punched.
That goes without saying, and was implied, I thought, in the post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RNWRKNP
Great thread and great comments and I would only add one thing. With exception to predators, if your not going to eat it you shouldn’t be killing the animal to begin with......
 
Curious as to what you mean by that.
Hunters that join groups like DU/pheasants forever that lobby to classify everything a wetland and do whatever they can to keep property owners from mowing/farming/draining their property. They also try and twist whatever rules they can so more "habitat" is created out of private property. That leads to things like the corp using drainage control that was put into place to reduce flooding, now is used to flood productive ground and make it "wetlands"

Also hunters that lobby to try and keep farmers from using crop damage permits to kill pests.

If you want to buy ground for your hunting hobby, great. Don't use tax money to buy it or .gov to force private property owners to raise them for you.

The MN buffers are a perfect example of idiot bird hunters having .gov force property owners to provide habitat for them.
 
Last edited:
Hunters that join groups like DU/pheasants forever that lobby to classify everything a wetland and do whatever they can to keep property owners from mowing/farming/draining their property. They also try and twist whatever rules they can so more "habitat" is created out of private property. That leads to things like the corp using drainage control that was put into place to reduce flooding, now is used to flood productive ground and make it "wetlands"

Also hunters that lobby to try and keep farmers from using crop damage permits to kill pests.

If you want to buy ground for your hunting hobby, great. Don't use tax money to buy it or .gov to force private property owners to raise them for you.

The MN buffers are a perfect example of idiot bird hunters having .gov force property owners to provide habitat for them.

Agree with that line of thinking. A farmer and ranchers land is just that, their land. We are the stewards of our environment and I’m not ok with poisoning a stream that runs through your property as an example and feeds into another. Beyond common sense things like that, nobody should have a say in how you manage your property without market compensation to the land owner that they agree to. Shit like you mention burns my ass......permits for pest control ??
 
That why I like Delta that controls predators in nesting grounds so more ducks migrate, period. $50 to them will kill a dozzen egg-eating skunks. Probably 600 more migrating ducks. $50 to DU will buy 12 square inches of marsh that was marsh before they started.

Back home skunks are on the list but for different reasons. Sub zero temperatures in the winter generally deem a sub floor or dirt cellar (old house) and skunks like a warm spot as well. Not a problem until they spray and you will never get that smell out of the floor.
 
well,let me offend everybody. 1) my biggest bitch is "primitive weapons" early seasons? modern muzzle loaders-stainless steel actions/barrels,scope sights,saboted bullets,synthetic powders-give me a break. my carbon steel,wood stocked tikka is way less primitive. a ruger #1 would be same,same but not "primitive". 2) the modern compound bow? synthetic material,double pulleys,steel strings,razor heads,synthetic shafts-in NO way a primitive weapon. am from fl and don't hunt a lot but for a long time off and on since late 50s. when bows and muzzle loaders were really "primitive" early seasons were,in a rather limited way,just. now,just another industry helping joke. 3) bow hunting in general-yes can be done well. requires a large degree of dedication and practice with superior "hunting" skills as said by OP. in my direct experience,the average bow hunter loses 1-3 deer for every 1 recovered. bozos just go out in early,unharrassed season and slings arrows at anything,anywhere,anyhow hoping to score. never touch a bow before the season. yes,that is also very true of many rifle hunters. bad hit with 30/06 often succeeds where bad bow hit loses game. 3) buckshot for deer-a travesty by many sloppy hunters-spary and pray from what i have seen and about 50% recovery when used outside about 20-30m. 4) "long range" game shooting? makes me uncomfortable but that is purely an emotional response. 800m elk with a 338 LM? skilled shooter,clean kill,high % recovery-really can't object in a rational manner. modern bullet tech has been a huge game changer in all shooting areas. personally have lots of limits and know them. so,300m is absolute max under v.favorable conditions. others have more shooting and "hunting" skills so can make their own calls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris19d
I agree about “primitive weapons”, but there are plenty of hunters who go Paleolithic old school:
https://mdc.mo.gov/newsroom/hunter-takes-15-point-buck-atlatl-st-charles-county
My PSE bow is a 300mph+ bow and I’m shooting 3” mechanicals. The deer don’t get away, and it’s golf tee accurate to 40 yds easily. A quantum leap from the Bear I grew up shooting as a boy. They run about fifty yards every time and leave a blood superhighway to their point of expiration.
It more “harvesting”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RNWRKNP
My effective range will not be the same as yours. Yours will not be the same as someone else's. Very dependent on your personal skill, bullet /ammo choice, and quality working gear with an emphasis on skill.

The hornady ELD-X is guaranteed to expand down to 1600 fps.
I've read has a high probability to expand to 1500 fps, and probably will above 1400 fps. Less than 1400 is more unlikely than likely.

I also do not agree with the common theory that 1000 ft/lbs is the minimum. Maybe on moose or elk, but not mule deer, pronghorn, and especially not on whitetail. It's much lower. Celebrated hunting pistols for white tail are closer to 400-500 ft/lbs. With that in mind, I'll overshoot my FPS minimum threshold for expansion before I come close to minimum ft-lbs with my current hunting load in 6.5 CM. 960 yards ~ is when my fps drops below 1600 while I still have 817 ft-lbs of energy.
 
I agree about “primitive weapons”, but there are plenty of hunters who go Paleolithic old school:
https://mdc.mo.gov/newsroom/hunter-takes-15-point-buck-atlatl-st-charles-county
My PSE bow is a 300mph+ bow and I’m shooting 3” mechanicals. The deer don’t get away, and it’s golf tee accurate to 40 yds easily. A quantum leap from the Bear I grew up shooting as a boy. They run about fifty yards every time and leave a blood superhighway to their point of expiration.
It more “harvesting”.

Just throwing this out there but your bow is likely 300+ fps, not mph. It would need to be about 440 fps to be at 300 mph.
 
I fired three rounds last year and took 3 antelope 282, 587 & 454 yards respectively. None of them knew I was there and every hit was within a few inches other each other in the front shoulder. They dropped like a rock.

I was shooting 30-06 with my hand load Berger 168 VLDs @2851 fps. Those thing fly and kill....The 587 was a 30 mph gusty day. It was a 2 hour stalk across open country. (it was a few weeks into the season and they would spook at 1200 yards) I worked my way into a shallow ditch and moved so I was shooting directly into the wind. then I waited between gusts for good measure.......At 700 yards I decided I wanted to get a bit closer so I ditched my pack and belly crawled through sage to 587. Then patiently I waited for my shot.

I shoot over 1000 precision rifle rounds a year, which is small by this forum's standards but by most hunters' standards that is high. I have a super reliable range finder and routinely make hits to 1200 yards. I am a big fan of shoulder shooting. better margin for error and if you hit where you intend, they usually drop like a rock. a bit forward and its a lethal neck hit or a clean miss. a bit back (or slightly quartered) and you're in the boiler room.

With all that consider I feel a lot more ethical than the folks who drive around, jump out of a vehicle and shoot at animals who are moving around because they are spooked. I have seen some really bad hits that way. There is a lot of that here in Wyoming.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0936(1).JPG
    IMG_0936(1).JPG
    628.3 KB · Views: 38
Hunting is not fair to game period no matter the range unless you are tacking an animal with your hands and hulk hogan choking it to death.

Yea, the whole "fair chase" thing is subjective and sometimes lost on me. I'm more in the "fast clean kill" & "properly managed wildlife" camp. I am a legal by the book hunter. That said, anything I can do legally to stack the deck toward a clean kill I am going to do. I support Wyoming Game and Fish wholeheartedly. They are nice folks and seem to really set the bar for proper wildlife management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WoobieJ