It’s okay that it totally violates the 4th amendment cause hero’s been doing it since 1968.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fuck that. Unconstitutional as fuckI'll just add that "Terry Stops" are legal when done according to the law according to SCOTUS- and it's a highly effective technique for finding illegal guns, drugs, and other contraband.
Or you can just actually punish criminals and not go after the good guys when they take out the trash in the neighborhood.I'll just add that "Terry Stops" are legal when done according to the law according to SCOTUS- and it's a highly effective technique for finding illegal guns, drugs, and other contraband.
If we Americans just keep playing by the DEMS' rules forever- we'll never take our republic back. Fuck that... FUCK the DEMS' current border policies & rules, fuck the DEMS' current rules & policies on voting & elections, FUCK the DEMS' current rules & policies on allowing TRANNIES & other mentally ill- to buy guns...Fuck that. Unconstitutional as fuck
Supreme Court said slavery was legal and women can vote. Doesn’t mean their right
Or you can just read the part where I said "Terry Stops... when done according to the Law"... By ignoring that part, the part SCOTUS actually enforced on NY City- you argue a straw man.Or you can just actually punish criminals and not go after the good guys when they take out the trash in the neighborhood.
Or as a pretext for civil asset forfeiture.I'll just add that "Terry Stops" are legal when done according to the law according to SCOTUS- and it's a highly effective technique for finding illegal guns, drugs, and other contraband.
At this point, i dont want to leave anything up to those officers to determine if they have reasonable suspicion.... while I like the production of stop and frisk, the police have shown time and again that they are fine with lying and bending the rules so I'm not with them having ANY more authority to do ANYTHING. Let's just enforce our laws and stop letting criminals: loose, into the country by the millions, have welfare, ect.... and if the cops wouldn't go arrest me for kicking the crap out of the thief down the street, it wouldn't be an issue to begin with.Or you can just read the part where I said "Terry Stops... when done according to the Law"... By ignoring that part, the part SCOTUS actually enforced on NY City- you argue a straw man.
Modern, he is one the dinosaurs just more vocal and colorful.Wow! Kennedy got the 4th amendment completely wrong.
Used to think he was decent. How disgusting.
But typical of the modern Republican Party.
Or as a pretext for civil asset forfeiture.
Either the 4th amendment means what it says or it doesn't. Stop and frisk is unconstitutional and the only ones that back it are pigs tyrants and bootlickers
FIFYAt this point, i dont want to leave anything up to those officers to determine if they have reasonable suspicion....while I like the production of stop and frisk,theMANY but NOT ALL police have shown time and again that they are fine with lying and bending the rulesso I'm not with them having ANY more authority to do ANYTHING.Let's just enforce our laws and stop letting criminals: loose, into the country by the millions, have welfare, ect.... and if the cops wouldn't go arrest me for kicking the crap out of the thief down the street, it wouldn't be an issue to begin with.
I think you must be blindDon't deflect to a different law- stick to the topic of discussion- Terry Stops. Only the mentally ill & true anarchists think all cops are bad, think all laws are bad, think in rigid, absolutist terms.
Me, I judge things based on facts & objectivity, I judge people by their actions... For instance, when I say dems, I define them by who they vote for and not what their party registration might be, and RINOs by what they vote for.
I think it's pretty clear you're so pro anarchy and "anti- Rule of Law" that you're stuck in a mode of thinking that won't allow you to think objectively.
Sure there are way too many laws, regs, etc., but that doesn't mean the answer is anarchy!
I'm done here- have fun with your anarchistic rants.![]()
I'm not ruled by my emotions.I think you must be blind
You didn't respond to mine, is it because post #11 isn't an early enough comment? I feel left out.I'm not ruled by my emotions.
Now that I've responded to all the early comments- I'm out.
I mean, if he wasn't vision impaired he wouldn't have to type all his comments in size 24 font...I think you must be blind
Which one appears to be "just f*%&%#$ wrong" to you?Or as a pretext for civil asset forfeiture.
Either the 4th amendment means what it says or it doesn't. Stop and frisk is unconstitutional and the only ones that back it are pigs tyrants and bootlickers
It’s okay that it totally violates the 4th amendment cause hero’s been doing it since 1968.
Ok ding DongRepublicans do not have a vision or a mission to put forward with a coordinated agenda. In fighting and bickering. With that we will get pedo Joe. Really unfortunate that we can’t get together and have a coordinated agenda that people can believe in, a message of hope. No, we tear down our side and talk stupid shot rather than a way that can benefit all and all having a buy in and personal stake in the success of this country. Shit like this does nothing but help the left.
Here is his entire speech.
How much experience do you have in and around New Orleans, especially the amount of violent crime that goes on there? Just curious?
So 3 times in your entire life. My Step Mother has been robbed at gun point in New Orleans more times than you have visited the city.Honeymooned in New Orleans - been there twice since .
Rampant crime there worse every year .
The answer to crime being taking away rights is exactly the anti gun play book. And police seem to love it .
How about a trade - I propose if state and local and federal Gestapo give up civil asset forfeiture AND qualified immunity AND government immunity we can talk about stop and frisk.
And I did listen to the entire speech though right off the top when he repeatedly said the 4th amendment allows illegal detainment and searches of one’s person and property my “fuck you you fucking liar” went to 100
quite honestly, I'd rather have the bickering and infighting over the lockstep-marching authoritarian crap the left pulls. At least the right know where each other stand on issues and agree to put aside differences to promote a mutually agreeable agenda.Republicans do not have a vision or a mission to put forward with a coordinated agenda. In fighting and bickering. With that we will get pedo Joe. Really unfortunate that we can’t get together and have a coordinated agenda that people can believe in, a message of hope. No, we tear down our side and talk stupid shot rather than a way that can benefit all and all having a buy in and personal stake in the success of this country. Shit like this does nothing but help the left.
You must be fucking retired - crime in a ghetto city and that means everyone nation wide should lose rights - you’re now on ignore . Shameful that we share oxygen with you.So 3 times in your entire life. My Step Mother has been robbed at gun point in New Orleans more times than you have visited the city.
I don't think you understand just how fucked it is.
Your response is a space cadet line of bullshit. There is a reason people there want a more aggressive law enforcement approach.
You are not an adult.You must be fucking retired - crime in a ghetto city and that means everyone nation wide should lose rights - you’re now on ignore . Shameful that we share oxygen with you.
How about by your mother in law or whatever the Fuck a gun and a dog.
How about help her form a neighborhood vigilance committee?
Crime in a shit hole means suspend rights for everyone? Just want to be sure I’m understanding your argument.
Space cadet - is that what you called me? Okay boomer - help your people move from the shit hole and be quiet the adults are talking moron
Fuck you. No.How about a trade - I propose if state and local and federal Gestapo give up civil asset forfeiture AND qualified immunity AND government immunity we can talk about stop and frisk.
You are a winey child
Yes I know about you winey cunt
Eyes bhet u kan udneratsnd twat I am typing. Raednig wroks eevn if da lteters ain't in the right spots.
Words have meanings. Unless someone here is made out of grapes, no one is winey.So? Who's the winey cunt?
Yes, they do. But recognizing an obvious mis spelling and not understanding the context are two different things.Words have meanings. Unless someone here is made out of grapes, no one is winey.
As it stands now since the legal framework was made in 1968.MILF DOTS is correct. Must have reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk. It's been that way since 1968, Terry vs. Ohio. Was taught that in POST academy in 1996. Nothing new.
You’re doing greatYes, they do. But recognizing an obvious mis spelling and not understanding the context are two different things.
Hopefully you grasps this. Thanks for be my spell checker.![]()
That's not true. He's talking specifically, about New Orleans, because the crime is so bad. He's suggesting NOPD stop and frisk more often. We already have a national search and frisk, if there is reasonable suspicion. Kennedy was against the riots and city burns. He's one senator. He's not the Commander in Chief. I'm not saying stop and frisk is not abused. Often, it is.As it stands now since the legal framework was made in 1968.
This is a US senator pushing a bill for national stop and frisk.
The same hero’s who stood around and watched cities burn and children die would now be able to go hands on for any reason. And it’s not about fighting crime. It’s fine more loose pocket change to CAF.
I was edumicated in Louisiana and Florida... Moma said spellin's fo da Devil.You’re doing greatI’m sure English is not your primary language. Keep at it, you’ll get there!
Fair enoughI was edumicated in Louisiana and Florida... Moma said spellin's fo da Devil.