I saw the news reports when it happened . Reuters etc . " Authorities question why shooter was in this neighborhood " . Three days later they claim he shot his neighbors .
My ass .
Google the story and this turd is not from that neighborhood . The MSM cannot broadcast the truth .
We are being told by the day that Vegas was 114 F .
I checked on those days and they were 104 to 107 .
Seasonal average , 104 .
Media needs to lube the guillotines.
I saw the news reports when it happened . Reuters etc . " Authorities question why shooter was in this neighborhood " . Three days later they claim he shot his neighbors .
My ass .
Google the story and this turd is not from that neighborhood . The MSM cannot broadcast the truth . We are being told by the day that Vegas was 114 F .
I checked on those days and they were 104 to 107 .
Seasonal average , 104 .
Media needs to lube the guillotines.
There is a trend now to report the "heat index" as the actual temperature without making the distinction. If you know the trick you can spot it, as well as the cagey language they use to cover it up without it being an outright lie. There's usually and onscreen temp graph with a tiny label that says "heat index", so they can claim they reported it accurately without actually pointing out that it isn't the actual temperature. I've always HATED heat index and wind-chill factor stats, whose main purpose is to sensationalize the weather. I mean, you have to be an idiot to not know if it's hot AND humid, or cold AND windy, it's going to be more miserable, but the temp is the temp. Period. In the past they've always reported actual or forecast temps first, THEN added in the heat index/wind-chill to tell you how it's going to "feel". Now they just skip that first step and try to make you believe it was 114 and not 104, when they're really giving you the heat index. Carefully hidden somewhere in the reporting though, will be a buried acknowledgment that they're reporting heat index vs. real temp. That way they can tell you it was 114 and not be accused of inaccurate reporting, even though it was blatantly misleading. A "read the fine print" defense for their sensationalism, as it were.
Also, as someone else posted in the Pit earlier, they are starting to fudge the color gradients of temperature maps to shift the "red-hot" areas to lower temp ranges than in the past, making things look worse. We all know the narrative being pushed.