• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

PortaJohn

uF47ivZ0pNKU.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJF
Jack is gonna hurt his shoulder with a reach like that.
not really. it is rather funny.
the media has blamed trump for not having enough security, and they have tried to hide the fact that trump offered ng troops and pelosi rejected the offer. now they are stupidly admitting pelosi was in charge (she was not even questioned by the jan 6 "committee") because they forgot about that in the rush to point out trump's mistake.
 
I'm not following.

If Trump orders the NG to move Pelosi can't stop it.

How is Speaker of the House in charge of security? Is there any documentation for this chain of command?
If you can see though the bullshit this should answer your question:
Looked through a few different search engines, they've been busy adjusting the narrative.


R
 
I'm not following.

If Trump orders the NG to move Pelosi can't stop it.

How is Speaker of the House in charge of security? Is there any documentation for this chain of command?
The USCP Intelligence Division issued a Jan. 3 intelligence assessment, but didn’t highlight an imminent concern, Sund said. The division had intelligence available, but failed to include it, Sund testified.


Sund also told the panel that he was stymied in efforts to have National Guard troops assist U.S. Capitol police.


He’d asked the sergeant at arms of each chamber of Congress on Jan. 3 for permission to call in the National Guard, but was denied in deference to the “optics” of having National Guard troops at the Capitol, he said.


On Jan. 6, he asked House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving to call the National Guard, but didn’t receive approval for more than an hour, he said. The Guard’s arrival at the Capitol was delayed hours more by Defense Department officials, who also cited “the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill,” he said.


Memos on Jan. 4 and Jan. 5 from the Defense Department and Department of Army restricted the D.C. National Guard from being involved in responding to Jan. 6 pro-Trump protests, Sund confirmed in response to House Administration ranking Democratic Joseph Morelle of New York.


Sund was unaware of those restrictions until after the attack, he said.
 

Globalists are gonna go full retard to get Haley in.
 

Globalists are gonna go full retard to get Haley in.
They will begin to fail, which sounds good up front, but it will make things much worse as they would rather burn everything to the ground than ever face consequences of thier attempts. It will get much worse before it gets better.
 
If you can see though the bullshit this should answer your question:

The USCP Intelligence Division issued a Jan. 3 intelligence assessment

So she wasn't actually, officially in charge or part of the chain of command but through ineptness and breakdowns in procedure the chain of command was circumvented or broken by idiots.

Looked through a few different search engines, they've been busy adjusting the narrative.

I did follow the link to the "official" report ... it definitely supports the idea that Pelosi was involved in some of the communications but the real issue is she should not have ever been involved to begin with.
 
So she wasn't actually, officially in charge or part of the chain of command but through ineptness and breakdowns in procedure the chain of command was circumvented or broken by idiots.
i heard she personally rejected them. i wouldn't be surprised with her daughter's plan to film it.
the fact that msm had tried to "debunk" that only reinforces it for me.
 
not really. it is rather funny.
the media has blamed trump for not having enough security, and they have tried to hide the fact that trump offered ng troops and pelosi rejected the offer. now they are stupidly admitting pelosi was in charge (she was not even questioned by the jan 6 "committee") because they forgot about that in the rush to point out trump's mistake.
That is the most charitable take on things. The papers aren’t admitting anything. There’s no 3d chess here. Trump made a mistake, a kind he’s made several of lately, and Jack is swooning to spin it.

The main take here should be that Trump is either not prepared enough, or exhausted, or maybe under the weather, or just a late 70s dude with some memory issues. This is the presumptive GOP candidate.
 
i heard she personally rejected them. i wouldn't be surprised with her daughter's plan to film it.


In the "official" report it reads as if the capitol police request for NG assistance was delayed because some idiot asked Pelosi if it was OK even though it was not her decision to make.
 
the "official" report? is that the official christopher wray approved report?

hahahaha!
The winner gets to record historic moments it doesn’t mean they record them accurately. With the exception of planted crowd agitators that honestly did not gain the momentum they needed there was no need for the NG. As the video is reviewed and analyzed it will become clear that deep state imbedded personal are responsible for the violence and inciting violence the RayEbbs videotape is just one f many that will eventually be exposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: devildog93
That is the most charitable take on things. The papers aren’t admitting anything. There’s no 3d chess here. Trump made a mistake, a kind he’s made several of lately, and Jack is swooning to spin it.

The main take here should be that Trump is either not prepared enough, or exhausted, or maybe under the weather, or just a late 70s dude with some memory issues. This is the presumptive GOP candidate.
And the potato is the "presumptive" dem candidate. Your point ? The potato is somehow "better" ?

Never mind, you've made it very clear, over and over that you're a Trump hater, pure and simple.

What I cannot understand is that people like you hate him, in spite of all of his efforts to protect and improve your way of life. All of the people that you'd vote for are all for open borders. Look at what's going on at our Southern border. YOU are being replaced, pure and simple. But yet, in spite of the overwhelming evidence, you still don't get it. 🙄
 
Last edited:
They will begin to fail, which sounds good up front, but it will make things much worse as they would rather burn everything to the ground than ever face consequences of thier attempts. It will get much worse before it gets better.
Let the chips fall where they may. Time for more people to wake the fuck up.
 
the "official" report? is that the official christopher wray approved report?

hahahaha!

The winner gets to record historic moments it doesn’t mean they record them accurately. With the exception of planted crowd agitators that honestly did not gain the momentum they needed there was no need for the NG. As the video is reviewed and analyzed it will become clear that deep state imbedded personal are responsible for the violence and inciting violence the RayEbbs videotape is just one f many that will eventually be exposed.
.

.
Nope, the one @kenny1773 linked.

Prepared for, approved by, Jim Banks, Rodney Davis, Jim Jordan, Kelly Armstrong, Troy Nehls ... all RINOs I'm sure you'll tell me.
 
And the potato is the "presumptive" dem candidate. Your point ? The potato is somehow "better" ?

Never mind, you've made it very clear, over and over that you're a Trump hater, pure and simple.

What I cannot understand is that people like you hate him, in spite of all of his efforts to protect and improve your way of life. All of the people that you'd vote for are all for open borders. Look at what's going on at our Southern border. YOU are being replaced, pure and simple. But yet, in spite of the overwhelming evidence, you still don't get it. 🙄
I’m a pragmatist. It’s foolish to ignore a candidate’s problems even if they’re the superior option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doubloon
I’m a pragmatist. It’s foolish to ignore a candidate’s problems even if they’re the superior option.
With all the slagging you've done on biden on this site, I can just see your "impartiality" oozing over. :rolleyes:

You're not fooling anyone, no one is buying your bullshit. You're not a "pragmatist", you're nothing but a shill.
 
Last edited:
This is how they destroy us. No one is paying attention to the back page news.
They've done this to every state that produces anything.
Hell, only reason I noticed it, is I live here.
Alabama, already a relatively poor state, stands to lose $92 million in revenue.

 
Asking for the "official chain of command"?
Lol. That not how a corrupt, deep state election stealing regime works. So cute.