Maggie’s Funny & awesome pics, vids and memes thread (work safe, no nudity)
- Thread starter Lawless
- Start date
I think it is ironic that the left uses the word “Nazi” not only to tag everything they hate, they use it to identify what they see as extreme right wing, to the point of fetishism. Yet, the term “Nazi” was coined by the British in their habit of shortening names for things, and adding an “I” at the end. The name was was National Socialist German Worker’s Party. “Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei”. (The Nazi’s HATED the name the Brits gave them. )
Gasp! That wording? A socialistic Workers party? Wait a minute.
Typical of the left, to accuse everybody else of that which they themselves are guilty. That’s a foundational plank of the Left. They are talking about themselves.
In fact THAT’S a foundational plank of the Left as well, they HAVE to talk about themselves, incessantly.
- Nov 3, 2010
- 10,567
- 23,189
I am not a cosmology wizard but search this channel with black holes.
25 videos on blackholes over 15 years. Playlist
Last edited:
Less math but will still make your brain hurt. Blackholes do that for every bodies brain. Essentially dive by 0 made reality.
Not a soldier, just a Wannabe wanting to impress people with his camo shirt/pants. Probably wearing Crocs and "Little Mermaid" socks.
It is a skit done for entertainment
Depends on how hard you try to take what's being said as actual fact as opposed to a long rambling declaration of "we don't know".
Black holes ... all mass no volume single point ... need a theory to try to describe what's in the middle but we don't know what that is ... that's what would happen I think ... probably not a singularity some kind of stringy stuff ... no hair ... maybe ... cosmic strings ... blah blah spaghetti ... I'm hungry
Nothing ever escapes a black hole
Last edited:
Willamette Falls Electric Company Since 1889.
Come get you some of that early 1970s camper life.
Copy, Roger that, 10-4 good buddy
If I was digging in the bait tank, I'd throw that overboard because it's too small........for bait.....lol
Depends on how hard you try to take what's being said as actual fact as opposed to a long rambling declaration of "we don't know".
Black holes ... all mass no volume single point ... need a theory to try to describe what's in the middle but we don't know what that is ... that's what would happen I think ... probably not a singularity some kind of stringy stuff ... no hair ... maybe ... cosmic strings ... blah blah spaghetti ... I'm hungry
Nothing ever escapes a black hole
P
Got the printer and got it setup yesterday evening. Printed a few of the test prints, then a Rugged Obsidian suppressor tool.
Last edited:
Black holes do have a “size”. All that mass falling in doesn’t “disappear”. It’s being compressed due to the gravitational effects off all the mass present. Matter is neither created or destroyed. That mass takes up space. The almost unimaginable amount of mass contained inside a black hole on the scale of Ton618 would occupy an enormous amount of space, and create an accretion disk of massive proportions.
Black holes are not a singularity. The only singularity that has been identified with any amount of reasonable evidence involved the Big Bang.
How do you know this?
Proof?
Either way would be fine ... size or single point. You'd be an instant physics rockstar.
There is a massive amount of space (99%) in an atom compared to its actual mass.
Questions and Answers - How much of an atom is empty space?
An answer to the question: How much of an atom is empty space?
education.jlab.org
What constitutes a point can be represented in numbers, but it can't accurately be represented visually.
Matter is compressible under enough force into what is essentially a single point. Obviously a "singularity" is theory, but the maths back it up. The Big Bang theory is essentially the universe also began at a single point. We make a single point visible to illustrate and understand it's position spatially, but a point is invisible in two or more dimensions and the dot we use is just so we know where that point is.
Short answer is that we don't know. Under human conceptions of force water is essentially not compressible, but under celestial sized forces all matter is not only compressible, but down to nothing. This is why it was a dominant theory that singularities could represent a tear in the fabric of the universe and act as portals or holes.
Steven Hawking theorized that the supermassive black holes at the center of the universe could spawn white holes that spewed matter and energy. That's about the limit of what I understand. There are all sorts of theorized forces at work, and till we get close enough to study one it will all remain theory.
White hole - Wikipedia
If you want to ship something...........you will never have the correct size box...........been there, done that..........
I think I may have heard something about this during one of my trips back in the 70's..........
Depends on how hard you try to take what's being said as actual fact as opposed to a long rambling declaration of "we don't know".
Black holes ... all mass no volume single point ... need a theory to try to describe what's in the middle but we don't know what that is ... that's what would happen I think ... probably not a singularity some kind of stringy stuff ... no hair ... maybe ... cosmic strings ... blah blah spaghetti ... I'm hungry
Nothing ever escapes a black hole
Strings ARE religion so far… they don’t even have a good theory yet… maybe a postulation. Brian Greene is also a weenie.
And Hawking Radiation escapes from black holes…. That’s the jets that escape perpendicular to the plane of the black hole… if I am explaining that right.
Sirhr
Agree with all this based on my limited knowledge and understanding. The image I linked in that "escape" post was supposedly material escaping the gravity of a black hole ... I don't know whether or not people think it was material that crossed the horizon.
Also liked @Fig 's post which gave a strong nod to theory.
It's only when people start talking about it like it's fact because the [current] math is a good match. The maths have looked really good and been wrong before.
Seems like quite a few people lean this way today.
Similar threads
