And more Karen Read trial bullshit

nagantguy

Major Hide Member
Full Member
Minuteman
Aug 28, 2020
1,954
3,417

The defense gets in deep shit with the judge on not properly handling discovery one day one of the trial
Jurors sent home
And protests outside the courthouse.

At this point even if she did the deed the state has completely blown the case - multiple ways and when she walks this time she should sue the state , prosecutors as in both of them police and everyone else involved including the state forensics lab who let evidence be tampered with and leaving food in the vehicle that was supposedly the murder weapon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 101st and mosin46
The op-ed goes on to pick apart Brennan’s prosecution, citing Nuttall’s concession of having an unreliable memory on the stand and previous inconsistencies in his testimony.

Above is the “money quote from day k e of the trail - The states “Star witness “ admits to having an unreliable memory, and his testimony previously was inconsistent- he admits this on the stand - and keep in mind one of his bomb shells -was that while she was in the ambulance at one time she “rolled her eyes “.
Are they starting g a new “Chewbacca prosecution “ if you roll your eyes you must be guilty of a crime no one witnesses?

The arriving the OP sums it up saying “the defense has had 9 months to pick apart the states PISS POOR prosecution ( emphasis mine on the piss poor )
 

Another key witness for the state - one credited with the testimony to the grand jury to launch the murder trial against her - has admitted that he did not hear her ask someone to “look up hypothermia”
This will be the second state witness to be charged with perjury.
 
Let us not forgot that the video footage of her car did not show a broken tail light until AFTER it was impounded. The female witness yesterday admitted to lying under oath and to discussing her testimony with another witness which is a HUGE no-no
 
So glad that bald EMT witness is done. He should have been impeached on the sole grounds of saying "ahhhm" nonstop.
Is he the one that says he thinks she murdered her boyfriend because at one point in the ambulance she rolled her eyes ?

So they got damning piece of evidence and the bitch ems has now admitted her testimony previously wasn’t true .
But they do have some text messages about a local bar made her drinks really weak. That’ll probably get her the chair !
 
I know we're only a week into this, but so far I think the most damning evidence the state is gonna use against her is the interviews she did with the media after the first trial. NEVER talk to the media! Anyways, so far I'm loving Alan Jackson (the lead defense attorney). He's been brutal on cross-exam. Also, he gave a great opening statement.
 
I know we're only a week into this, but so far I think the most damning evidence the state is gonna use against her is the interviews she did with the media after the first trial. NEVER talk to the media! Anyways, so far I'm loving Alan Jackson (the lead defense attorney). He's been brutal on cross-exam. Also, he gave a great opening statement.
I was hoping he’d do the opening statement something like from My Cousin Vinnie- “ everything this guy says is bullshit “ while pointing at the prosecution.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shoreglide
I'm betting the real story is that his shitty cop friends beat his ass and tossed him out the door into a snowbank. Why? Either he wanted to fuck one of their girlfriends or they wanted to fuck his and she said no to the gangbang. She got mad and left and then he still wanted to get in on the group sex without bringing a woman to share for the group. Nobody wanted him blowing nut all over their slut and it became a fight.

Add something to do with refusing to split money stolen from drug dealers and not sharing his drug stash with the guys and you will have the entire story.

The testimony from witnesses who stammer, pause and repeatedly say "ummmmmmmmmmmm", is typical of people trying to remember lies.
 
I'm betting the real story is that his shitty cop friends beat his ass and tossed him out the door into a snowbank. Why? Either he wanted to fuck one of their girlfriends or they wanted to fuck his and she said no to the gangbang. She got mad and left and then he still wanted to get in on the group sex without bringing a woman to share for the group. Nobody wanted him blowing nut all over their slut and it became a fight.

Add something to do with refusing to split money stolen from drug dealers and not sharing his drug stash with the guys and you will have the entire story.

The testimony from witnesses who stammer, pause and repeatedly say "ummmmmmmmmmmm", is typical of people trying to remember lies.
You’ve most likely nailed it except you forgot the part about dead guy and ex partner being investigated a while back for being somehow involved in a stolen dog/ fighting dog ring . And look how hard the state fought to suppress the evidence of dog bite punctures on dead guy . A KEY piece of evidence everyone seems to be missing
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Shoreglide
All I needed to see was one piece of evidence. It was the photo of the "damage" done to the SUV. If you ram into someone hard enough to kill them on impact, there's gonna be considerably more damage to the vehicle than just a broken tail light lense.
And the tail light wasn’t broken until it was in the forensic teams garage . Cause they fucking broke it .
 
Last edited:


To add to this flying circus- the judge is goi g to allow some expert witnesses to testify whose report is not yet complete and misses the discovery deadline by almost a month- and this is at the defense attorneys urging.

If the defense has a “ringer “ of some “crash site reconstruction experts “ wouldn’t they have used the last almost 2 years to have them get their shit together?
 
If Karen Read had any chance at all of a fair trail as is her right as a citizen it is over .
Let me see if my score card matches yours.
Lead detective fired for misconduct
Prosecutor fired for misconduct
Evidence tampered with
At least 3 of the states witnesses against her have admitted to lying in their previous testimony
One of these prosecutions witnesses broke a none disclosure order and communicated with the prosecution on an encrypted phone .
The original crime scene wasn’t properly secured for what 16 hours
AND during trial #2 they reconstructed the crime scene by parking Reads SUV on top of the spot they found O’Keefs body.

The only real inconsistency on the defense side is the judge allowing their expert witnesses to testify at a later date even though they did not make the discovery deadline and have not completed their investigation or report .


How can anyone think this is anything remotely resembling a fair trail?
 
Yesterday the "cell phone" expert admitted that he could not exclude the dead guys phone from being INSIDE the house AND that the phone made a call 2 minutes after the prosecutor says he died
I have a theory on that I was waiting for someone to bring it up.

So she left the party ; he came outside to give her a kiss , a hug, maybe punch her in the face. And she started her engine, ran him over , drove home. Ran back to the party in a blizzard with her dog, moved his body to near the flag pole Let the dog chew on him for a mi minute or two.went back inside the party , found his phone and made a call on it to throw off any investigation and make it hard to establish a TOD and did all this in just under 2 minutes.
And all of the above is complete made up bullshit while I soak my sore ass feet in an Epsom salt bath- new work boots not working out- and it is still more plausible then anything the state has said .
 
Last edited: