• Get 25% Off Access To Frank's Online Training

    Use code FRIDAY25 and SATURDAY25 to get 25% off access to Frank’s online training. Want a better deal? Subscribe to get 50% off.

    Get Access Subscribe

Shoot kid in the back of head -pay $4.9 million settlement and all is good !

nagantguy

Major Hide Member
Full Member
Minuteman
Aug 28, 2020
2,476
4,133


Way back in 2017 , before “all the good ones” left or were forced out .

They wanted to question Isaiah about his brothers whereabouts and possible connection to a shooting , Isiah ran away- and Sacramento PD officer Villicruz shot the unarmed teen in the back of the head.

They marveled at the “good shot “ and waited serval minutes to call for medical attention, and even handcuffed him while his brain was on the ground - in case an unarmed kid was still dangerous.

Instead of treating it like a murder - almost 8 years of legal wrangling resulted in a near $5 million dollar settlement to the family. But deemed the shooting justified I guess they were afraid of a young kid they wanted to question about someone else .
 
Fleeing Felon.

Under US Law the fleeing felon rule was limited in 1985 to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others."

A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead...however...Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Safetyoff700
Fleeing Felon.

Under US Law the fleeing felon rule was limited in 1985 to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others."
Ha.
Same people that said slavery was legal

Same people that say 2nd 4th 1st etc violations are a ok

Same people that make up out of whole cloth things like a “balancing test “
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
Ha.
Same people that said slavery was legal

Same people that say 2nd 4th 1st etc violations are a ok

Same people that make up out of whole cloth things like a “balancing test “
Same people my ass. Uh… Tennessee v garner is an 1985 case not a 1845. You’re off (in the head) a few dozen decades. This case gives you everything you’re whining about and you still aren’t happy. Typical liberal woman

“Legal scholars have expressed support for this decision stating that the decision had "a strong effect on police behavior" and specifically that it can "influence police use of deadly force."[3]
 
Same people my ass. Uh… Tennessee v garner is an 1985 case not a 1845. You’re off (in the head) a few dozen decades. This case gives you everything you’re whining about and you still aren’t happy. Typical liberal woman

“Legal scholars have expressed support for this decision stating that the decision had "a strong effect on police behavior" and specifically that it can "influence police use of deadly force."[3]
Yeah. Same class of people. Out of touch oligarchs.


You think the original post fits the fleeing felon definition ?
Do you understand equality under the law , laws apply to everyone equally ? Cut outs for special animals are unconstitutional. Period
 
Fleeing Felon.

Under US Law the fleeing felon rule was limited in 1985 to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others."
Well that’s all well thanks for helping - the kid was not a fleeing, they just wanted to ask him about his brother , and he’s under 0 obligation to answer any questions about his brother or anything else .

Where did the fleeing felon come into play? Isiah wasn’t wanted in connection to the crime , wasn’t wanted for any crime .
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
Did it say in the video how the initial homicide investigation (why the police were there in the first place) case turned out? If it did I missed it.
Isiah’s brother was never charged or convicted in the murder he was a suspect in . He was not in jail as of the settlement being paid .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DuneBoer
Yeah. Same class of people. Out of touch oligarchs.


You think the original post fits the fleeing felon definition ?
Do you understand equality under the law , laws apply to everyone equally ? Cut outs for special animals are unconstitutional. Period
Awe hell nah. That ☝️Looks an awful lot like murder, but it doesn’t matter what I think now. Opinions don’t mean didly. Only thing that matters is who can afford the most expensive lawyer.

You guys blame cops for the screwed up system. Attorneys are right in the middle of it all screwing things up coming and going. Don’t matter what color they wear. Lawyers help get murderers (not just cops) off Scott free all the time but you guys never look under that rock.

Too busy smoking weed in dad’s basement listening to rage against the machine I guess.

Lawyers are the oligarch's that throw bricks in the system then hide their hands, but for some reason you guys only blame the police, not the ass hats helping ALL murderers skip out on justice
 
Awe hell nah. That ☝️Looks an awful lot like murder, but it doesn’t matter what I think now. Opinions don’t mean didly. Only thing that matters is who can afford the most expensive lawyer.

You guys blame cops for the screwed up system. Attorneys are right in the middle of it all screwing things up coming and going. Don’t matter what color they wear. Lawyers help get murderers (not just cops) off Scott free all the time but you guys never look under that rock.

Too busy smoking weed in dad’s basement listening to rage against the machine I guess.

Lawyers are the oligarch's that throw bricks in the system then hide their hands, but for some reason you guys only blame the police, not the ass hats helping ALL murderers skip out on justice
Nope I have equal scorn for the entire “justice” industry. Judges mediators, friend of the court , township boards , state law makers ect .

But in this case it was pig that shot a kid in the head - a kid that wasn’t armed and wasn’t wanted for any crime . No judge in sight . No judge in site when department called it good . No judge anywhere until 2 years after the fact when the investigation was reopened .
A judge didn’t decide not to charge the pig with murder . That was all pig command structure and union reps .
 
I agree that he had zero obligation to answer questions about his brother...... but if you run they are going to chase you.

And if they think that you may be armed-- and then you come up with the great idea to climb the fence into a day care-- then you get what you get. That is where it changes for me-- a person fleeing into a day care changes the game.

Not a cop, not a cop defender. Hell- I've never called the cops in my life and don't see that changing.
 
Nope I have equal scorn for the entire “justice” industry. Judges mediators, friend of the court , township boards , state law makers ect .

But in this case it was pig that shot a kid in the head - a kid that wasn’t armed and wasn’t wanted for any crime . No judge in sight . No judge in site when department called it good . No judge anywhere until 2 years after the fact when the investigation was reopened .
A judge didn’t decide not to charge the pig with murder . That was all pig command structure and union reps .
There’s a DA in the mix there to buddy. Like I said lawyers throw bricks and hide their hands.

I hate our justice system as much as you. Money corrupt the whole thing.