• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Did anyone else notice any light scoring on the jacket on the bullets you received? Some of the ones I got had a light, almost rifling-like scoring on some of the jackets. I'll rummage through the remaining ones I have and see if I can find any and post pix to show what I'm referring to.
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CEGA</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Did anyone else notice any light scoring on the jacket on the bullets you received? Some of the ones I got had a light, almost rifling-like scoring on some of the jackets. I'll rummage through the remaining ones I have and see if I can find any and post pix to show what I'm referring to. </div></div>

They must have sent you USED bullets!
smile.gif


Jim G
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Jim -

You mean to tell me that Berger didn't send you the same extra special pre-engraved ultra-high speed low friction super bullets they sent me? Guess you just got the "regular" ones.

Carl
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

On the final

338 250g OTM TACT Lot 4103

At first these impressed me right out of the box. The initial look was top of the line as would be expected from Berger.

Checked base to Ojive and found
18% @ .778
19% @ .779
63% @ .780

Checked bearing surface.
31% @ .514
55% @ 515
13% @ .516
1% @ .517

Base to tip
1.619 to 1.633

Weight spread
1% @ 249.9
19% @ 250.0
72% @ 250.1
7.5% @ 250.2
.5% @ 250.3

At the range.

100 Yards zero optics
Load showed not to be consistent enough with my rifle. turned to wind deflection test

300 Yards showed some improvment wind showed to be holding with in .5 to .75 better than the sierra 300g SMK

400 Yards groops came togather seemed to have become stable. wind stability with out a doubt is good .5 to .75 MOA better than SMK

600 Yards wind deflection .5 moa better than250 SMK. Groop is 4.15 inch 5 shots.

1000 Yards grooped at .75 MOA 10 shots wind deflection seemed to be the sams as the 300g SMK. Groups show to be the same ( with less recoil)

1500 Yards Bullet holds 1 MOA over 15 shots came through target stable back stop was limestone bullets drove 8 inches in and seperated jackets, opened up. these show good for tactical applacations.

1800 Yards Wind switching back and fourth in valley was able to call most shots in but would not be able to give honest estament on what they did all I can give is my personal oppenion using the experance that I have from fireing them. Had to stop test at this point.
In my oppenion.... You are doing these right!!!!!!

In closing...
These Hybrids have taken me from the 250SMK to a hole new experince. Weights and base to Ojive measurments were consistent.
The differnce that I have found was in the bearing surface this seems to be from the boat tail not from the Ojive.
the load was pushing these at 3015fps the bullet came into its own at the 400 yard mark and became quite stable.

Would I has a consumer buy these bullets? Yes. Would I recomend these to other shooters? Yes.Would I use these in a F-Class match? Yes.

Thank you for the chance to be one of the chosen to test these bullets. I would love to do this with others that you produce. I was as tight and as honest as possible with my results. As you asked me to do what I do for my normal reloading.

Thank you
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I tested these at the 600meter line and my Vortex Razor had issues with parallax not adjusting so I cant give an accurate report on these bullets....however I loaded them to 3.690 oal using H1000 and fed 215m with lapua cases for my sav 110 fcp hs
89g average mv 2640 shot 7.5" group
89.5g average mv 2660 shot 4 5/8" group
90g mv 2665 (had bad spread in velocity) shot 8" group
90.5g mv 2685 shot 8 3/4" horizontal but 2 1/2 vertical (wind kicked up bad)
91g mv 2723 shot 10" group (terrible!)
I just got my Razor back literaly as I typed this up so I need to re test everything
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I have visited this site for over a year reading and gaining knowledge but never registered till now.
I applied for and received 2 boxes of Bergers 250gr Hybrid OTM Tactical for testing and here are my results. I like them.
This pic should keep you interseted. The final tests were shot at 560 yds. the longest distance I can shoot at my range. This group was shot at that distance with 91.5grs of IMR 7828SSC at 3160 fps. It was sighter group for testing to get on target.
bergertests017.jpg

My rifle
Rem 700 with a 30 inch Broughton tube 1:9.3 twist with a Muscle brake chambered and installed by Jim See @ Centershotrifles.
Canjar set trigger
EGW 20 moa base with 4 Burris Signiture Z rings Holding a Burris 8x-32x-50 Black Diamond
Bobby Hart LRT stock Devcon bedded by ME.
Bipod custom made by myself.
100_0917.jpg

100_0919.jpg

I decided to use powders that I already have that I used with the 225 gr Barnes TTSX testing. I don't know if this matters but Broughton says my barrel bore was .3385 so I have been using a little faster burning powders to slug up the bore ( so to speak )
The bullets have a G7 BC of .349 and a G1 BC of .682 I weighed them and out of 100
72 weighed 249.9grs
10 weighed 249.8grs
15 weighed 249.7grs
3 weighed 249.6grs
I didn't go thru the trouble of measuring them, length or ogive, but I did notice the tip ( or hollow point ) on some of them was at an angle, not flat, but that didn't seam to matter in my tests. I have a friend that got a tool to make the tip of bullets flat or uniform on his 6.5mm Berger VLD's and did some tests and at 500 yds it didn't make any difference. ( and that gun would shoot 5/8th's inch groups at 500 yds all day long)
Here is a pic of the bullets I have shot before
250 Nosler AB 250 Berger OTM 225 Barnes TTSX
bergertests001.jpg

Continued on next post.
Tarey
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I forgot to mention this but my rifle is a 338 Rem Ultra Mag.
I am using once fired brass that I bought new. It has been prepped and annealed. I use a Lyman full length die that I honed the neck area to give me .003 neck tension. I use a Hornady new dimension seater die that has the sleeve inside that holds the bullet straight in line with the neck. I made another sleeve and honed it to just let the bullet fit to get tighter tollerances while seating the bullets in my cases to keep the runout at a minimum. I weigh every charge.
I started out with IMR 7828SSC
Fed 215 Mag primers
I loaded from 87gr in 1/2 grain increments to 90 gr. seated .050 off the lands.
Testing was done at 300 yds. The 90 gr produced a 1.034 3 shot group at 3020 fps.
I tried some more at .015 and .070 off the lands with the 90 grs and the .070 produced a group just under an inch at 300 yds. I loaded some more up with
90.5 91 and 91.5 grs and the 91.5 gave a little more velocity and grouped as well 3 shots at 1 inch at 300 at 3160 fps.

I also tried H 4831SC
Fed 215 Mag primers
I loaded in 1/2 grain increments from 87.5 to 90.5 gr seated .070 off the lands.
The 90.5 grouped the best despite the wind and mirage that day with 3 in 1 1/4 inch at 300 yds at 3060 fps. I know I can still go higher with the 4831 but with the amount of bullets I was given, my load development was limited if I was goint to stretch them out to 500 Meters.

I loaded up 15 with 91.5 grs. IMR 7828SSC and I loaded 10 up with 90.5 grs. H4831SC for my testing at 500 Meters ( 560 yards at my range )
I used my go to load of 92 grs. of H 4831SC with a Barnes 225 gr TTSX at 3217 fps to get on target at 500 despite 3.5 to 6 mph winds.
bergertests018.jpg

I had to come up 6 MOA on my scope ( 48 1/8th clicks ) from my 300 yard setting to get on at 560 yds.
I shot three 3 shot groups with thw IMR 7828 SSC first letting the barrel cool down to outside temps between shots. Temps started out at 62* and wind was from right to left from 3.5 to 6 mph. These first 2 groups would of been really small if the wind didn't play havock with my testing.
bergertests014.jpg

bergertests013.jpg

I really like how these bullets show very little verticle variation.
I then shot the ones loaded with H 4831SC. The wind had changed directions and the mirage was moving my 3 inch orange dot around about 3 inches. The temps were at 70* and the wind was from left to right now. I tried to shoot when the wind was blowing the mirage away so I could get a more accurate aimimg point. I even cut the power down on the Burris to 24x.
This was the last group of the day and was the best with this powder.
bergertests012.jpg

I am going to do some more testing with these bullets when they come out in April. I really like how they shot and my barrel clean up was really easy. I didn't clean it till after the first 70 rounds and after just a couple patches of Bore Tech eliminator the patches came out clean. I even soaked it again and let it sit and the patch had hardly any green on it. I hope to try these on elk if I get drawn ( just put in for a cow tag here in Az )I would like to try some 4350 and go a little higher with the H 4831SC.
I would like to thank Michelle Gallagher from Berger for giving me this opportunity to test these bullets. I like the short bearing surface compared to some of the other 338 cal. bullets that will let these be shot at higher velocities and the accuracy is there. I can't wait to get some more.
I an going to try some of the 168gr 308 dia. Hybrids in my 308 Win.
Tarey
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

FINAL TESTING
I went out today for my last test session and this test was to verify my load of of 88.4gr N560 which turned out to be my best load and powder selection. The powders I tested with are N560, H4831SC, and H1000 and I rank them in that order as far as performance for my rifle. Verified fps @ 200yds which still averaged 2904fps,ES-10.56,SD-4.53 with .5MOA. loaded short of my CIP mag length 3.750" to allow for meplat distortion. Best performance @ 100 was .030 off the lands .39MOA but I will have to say these Bergers <span style="font-weight: bold">ARE</span> jump friendly as I shot this load @ 500yd .58 MOA and 1000yds .87 MOA. 2-3 wind and DA of 6450ft,dialing up 1.7 MOA less @ 1k. Using my Delta IV software means 5.9 less @ 1500 and 15.4 less @ 2000 compared to my 250gr SMK's and to me that's a winner! Just wish I had more of them to verify my software assumptions but it proved right on today during my tests.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Good job Bryan/Berger on the development... I'll be buying some more for sure. Oh wait Berger is going to send me 200 more free right?</span>

Thanks for opportunity for letting me participate
Sully
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

To date i've tested- 300SMK, 250SMK, 300Berg OTM HYB, 250Berg OTM HYB, HORN285 BTHP. I was a bit skeptical if this bullet would do well with a 1:9 twist... sure it'd "work", but would it shine in the lineup of .338 long range bullets available?

Well I tested 50 yesterday with 10-20mph gusting crosswinds. To date these 250 Berger's have yielded the tightest ES/SD i've seen in a .338 bullet.

My shoulder feels like hamburger, all benches at range were taken so all shots were fired prone. Not saying this bullet recoils hard(er), but I could use some practice on prone shooting and a happy medium scope setup re: eye relief for bench/prone.

I found 2 good loads with good ES's and groups. Highest powder weight, 93 grains of H1000 and had no signs of pressure. Future tests will go up to +95'ish grains.

My custom OAL was based off a .010" jump to lands and majority of the bullets fit inside the magazine. 1.625-1.630" bullet length fit with some nice clearance and there were a handful of 1.640-1.644(too long for mag). If I were to use a .015 - .020 jump, all would fit in the magazine.

Using Strelok on my DroidX, Berger's BC proved correct at 1100yds, 1rst shot hit 5" low & 5" left of center. 1500yds is going to be interesting.

In comparison to the 250SMK, no contest, Berger. The Berger 250 Hybrid OTM definitely has a reserved space on my reloading bench. Two others that have done well for me are the 300 Berger Hybrid OTM and the Hornady 285.

More info will follow soon.



 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

3-16-12 Berger 250 Hybrid OTM Range Report
Airport Rifle Range, Grand Junction Colorado
65deg, 10-20mph gusting crosswinds W>E.
4600 FASL, 22 Pressure, inHg

Brass- Lapua, once fired, F/L sized using RCBS dies.
OAL- Custom .010 jump to lands, 3.756" OAL using a 1.625" bullet to set seating depth.
Primer- CCI 250 Magnum
Powder- H1000
Rifle- Savage 110FCP .338LM 1:9 RH twist, Vortex Viper PST/EBR MOA Reticle
F1 Chronograph

90.5gr/ 2791 AVG/ 21 ES/ 9.75 SD / .55" GRP
91.0gr/ 2803 AVG/ 16 ES/ 5.75 SD / .45" GRP
91.5gr/ 2810 AVG/ 18 ES/ 6.00 SD / .9" GRP
92.0gr/ 2832 AVG/ 28 ES/ 12.00 SD / .8" GRP
92.5gr/ 2849 AVG/ 70 ES/ 24.00 SD / .5" GRP
93.0gr/ 2897 AVG/ 34 ES/ 9.50 SD / .75" GRP

Because I was sore, I shot 5 shot groups and counted the best 3 of 5. The 91gr load would've been a bug hole but kept pulling it.

No signs of high pressure in any of the 50 rounds fired. The 46fps gain from 92.5-93 is solid, more like +50fps if the 1 velocity "flier/flopper" wouldn't have existed in each of the 2 loads.

The next 50 will be pressure/ladder test along with long range accuracy using up to 95.5 grains of H1000.
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Because of the short time frame, a scheduled vacation and rain all this weekend, I was only able to test one box. I used the same load I developed for the 250 SMK, which is 87gr of H-1000 in Lapua brass set 20thou of the lands. I weighed the projectiles and found about 80% around 248.8gr, the rest varied up and down a bit but none of them over. The first 30 rounds were shot out of my Savage BA 110 at a mile on a very windy day. The Berger’s seemed to produce better stability and tracking than the SMK in the high wind, but not by much? I was missing the mile target, a 24x24 piece of steel by about 10 feet about the same as I was missing with the SMK; however the misses with the Berger’s were more consistent and predictable, whereas the misses with the SMK were more sporadic and all over the place.

The second batch was shot out at 300 yards, in my un-scientific test, the results between the Berger’s and the SMK was minimal. They were both shooting ½ MOA or less. The SMK group was not as consistent as the Berger grouping. I mean the SMK were more random, the Berger’s were more patterned. I will shoot the other box as soon as weather permits and will report the results. But I knew they needed feedback ASAP, so I am reporting my unorthodox results.

In the Berger’s defense, they are so much more streamlined then the SMK, I really needed to measure and set from the Ogive as opposed to using the same data I use for the SMK because I do not really know where they were sitting in relation to my lands. On the next box I will do this for sure.

I thank Berger for the opertunity to be part of this testing, I wish they would have provided more time so I did not feel rushed, but it is what it is.

Diego
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I was able to get out over the course of two weeks to do some testing of the new Berger 250 gr. Hybrid. I would have liked to have done more load testing but do to the small amount of time I was limited. I would also like to thank Berger Bullets for this opportunity.

Rifle: 338 EDGE built by Kirby Allen Barrel: 30” 1:10 twist

Remington Case

Retumbo Powder 98.5 – 100.0grs

CCI mag primer

My OAL to lands is <span style="font-weight: bold">3.959 </span>I loaded the first test rounds for single loading at <span style="font-weight: bold">3.860 </span>

My OAL for magazine use is <span style="font-weight: bold">3.785 </span>


Over my CED Chrono: (<span style="font-weight: bold">3.860 AOL</span>)

Grs. / FPS 100 YDS 300 YDS
98.5 / 2978 1.0 moa 1.0 moa (10)
99.0 / 3020 .75 moa .75 moa (10)
99.5 / 3051 .50 moa .50 moa (10)
100. / 3075 .25 - .50 .50 moa (10)

The below loads (99.5 & 100.) was loaded to magazine length. (3.785) They were slower loaded at this length with a powder weight of 99.5. The groups opened up to just over 1 moa loading to mag length at 100 yds.

In fairness I need to work on this load for mag length. Just need more TIME.


99.5 / 3034 1.097” (5) group
100 / 3055 .75 moa (5)

<span style="font-weight: bold">
As always use caution working with these loads. What works in my rifle might be a problem in yours. I feel that I could push these a little more and will try at a different time.</span>

Next time out was at 1000 yds at Long Range Alley outside of Shreveport La. which is 5 hrs from where I live. The wind was not my friend as it was very gusty.
cry.gif
I forgot to pack my Krestel for the trip. At times the “Red Range Hot” indicator flag which is 18 feet by 6 feet was fully extended. The mirage was also a factor at mid day.
IMG_0239.jpg

IMG_0241.jpg


I settled on the 3075 fps load for this test. I was by myself working on the 1000 yd range. I would fire 5 rounds then drive down and check the target. Did this 5 times. My come ups from a 100 yd zero was 20.25 moa. This was about 1 moa lower from what all the ballistic programs were telling me. I have not shot the 250 SMK’s only the 300 SMK’s. My come ups for the 300’s are 25.0 moa with the same 100 yd zero at 2840 fps. Wind deflection with the Bergers did seem to run inside the 300’s by at least .50 moa. My best groups despite the wind were from 1.0 moa to 1.50 moa. Winds were gusting from my 6 o’clock to my 3 o’clock back and forth. I do intend to take these out to a mile or so when time and availability permits. Would like to see how these or a hunting version would work on a deer or elk. It appears that Berger has hit another home run.
wink.gif

IMG_0243.jpg


IMG_0231.jpg
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

OK, here we go.

I got my two boxes of the Berger Hybrid 250gr .338 bullets on 3/5.

I'm thankful for being chosen by Berger, I must say.

Some bullet data:

I figured that micing 50 out of the 100 bullets would be a valid statistical sample size out of a total of 100, so I only fiddled with one box.

Bullet lengths:

The Bergers, as others have noted, have random peaks, usually a single peak, above the meplat. This affects overall length.

Out of the 50 bullets that I measured, I had:

1 at 1.615"

2 at 1.619"

2 at 1.641"

The majority of the remaining bullets were clustered in the 1.625"-1.627" range, with a few below/above that range.

Bullet ogives:

Using my older Stoney Point comparator/bushing holder and a Hornady .338" comparator, I measured the ogives:

1 at .770"

3 at .771"

21 at .772"

23 at .773"

2 at .774"

Note, I didn't get any binding on the bottom of my SP holder, as it was deep enough to accomodate the slender noses of the Berger Hybrids.

Bullet weights:

RCBS CM 1500:

2 at 249.8 grs

15 at 249.9 grs

20 at 250.0 grs

10 at 250.1 grs

3 at 250.2 grs.

Testing enviroment:

I wasn't able to go to Manatee SE of Tampa, to shoot their 1000 yard range and the Palm Beach Sheriff's training facility range isn't going to do another 300 yard shoot until July, I think it is, so I'm stuck at 100 yards for this test. They did have the 300 yard shoot on 3/4/12, but that didn't help me out.

I last shot a rifle (at Manatee) on 4/8/11, when I shot my Savage LE2b and Sako TRG-42 at 1k. So it's been a good eleven months for me, behind any long gun.

Weapon:

I bought my TRG-42 in January of '06, so it's a 1:12" twist. I got the SB PMII 5-25x50 P4 scope and the 3 ring Sako 30* mount, along with the Sako bipod and muzzle brake.

I have 883 rounds down the barrel before this test. I've shot it about a half dozen times at 1k. I've also shot it out to 600 yards, at steel, a couple of times and finally, 300 yards prone, three times. Probalbly about 400-500 rounds between 300 yards and 1k. Not a lot, but there you have it.

After the last visit, I thoroughly cleaned the bore and left the turrets set for that distance.

Test subject:

You can see in my photos, the comparison between the 250gr Scenar, the Berger and the 250gr SMK here:

250ScenarBergerHybridSMKflash.jpg


250ScenarBergerHybridSMK.jpg


Let's get down to the nuts and bolts.

On 3/13/12, I was able to shoot my first small batch of the Bergers at 100 yards. I used the Sako bipod and a small rabbit eared sandbag under the butt.

Reloading details:

For the reloading particulars, I only had 24 fired Lapua cases, so since I didn't want to pull down any of my loaded rounds and since I didn't want to use new brass on this limited sample size of 250 Hybrids, I was in a quandry.

My go to load is between 88grs and 89grs of H-4831sc under the 250gr Scenars and 250gr SMKs. I'm stuck with the 250s due to my older 1:12" twist tube. I also load with VV-165 and VV170, as well as H-1000, but the Hodgdon powder works really well for a velocity of between 2875 and 2925 through my 27 and 1/8 inch barrel.

I figured I would go with 88.5grs of H-4831sc, since it is a known 'node' for me and fiddle with seating depth and let the cards fall where they fell.

Since I already had neck sized all of my cases, I couldn't use a dummy round per se, so to find the lands with this particular bullet, what I did was seat one long, color it with a Sharpie and chamber it carefully. Upon extraction, I'd look for rifling marks around the bullet's ogive, apart from the singular scrape in one area, you might find upon extraction.

Note, they were so long, I couldn't 'eject' a case, but had to remove the bolt to free them up!

I ballparked my lands at ~3.870"ish, so I backed down to ~3.848" for the longer batch, 3.823" for a shorter variation, then ~3.798" and finally mag length safe at 3.728". Remember, I have about 900 rounds down my barrel and I'm sure that there is a good .020"-.030" of throat errosion.

For hardware, I load on a 17 year old Dillon 550b. Charges were via the ChargeMaster 1500. Dies are a Reading Bushing neck die with a .365 TiNi bushing and a Forster Micro Seater die. The Forster's seating plug is way too wide for this sharp nosed bullet and the Bergers were easily seating off the bottom (top?) of the plug, with no side support whatsoever. This caused some slight deformation to the noses (peaks) of 'some' of the bullets, but not all. I'm sure runout was exacerbated.

The above is a caveat for shooting this bullet, as one will have to get an appropriate VLD plug to properly seat these bullets, even if they are just hybrids.

For the past seven cycles, I've noted that FL sizing actually increases my headspace by ~.005", so I've only been neck sizing my cases. They fit snugly in the chamber with a slight bit of resistance upon locking the bolt...no bother for me.

I loaded up only 20 Bergers and took an extra 15 rounds of 338LM that I already had loaded up with 250gr Scenars over 88grs of H-4831sc and 215Ms, to use as fouling/sighters. These were mag length at ~3.730". I used these as sight ins and foulers, since the bore was whistle clean.

The first picture is a detailed shot of the Bergers fired over two visits, 3/13 and 3/17. The second picture is of the entire target with the fouling/sight in rounds using the 250gr Scenar ammo.

250Berger338test2.jpg


250Berger338test1.jpg


Total rounds fired, was 59, since I lost a Lapua case a few cycles back in a terrifying kinetic bullet puller accident. The 338LM doesn't fit folks and I had to wrench it out, killing the case. We did have a nice funeral for it, however.

I wasn't able to chrono day 1's 20 rounds, but I did get my 17 yeard old Pact Model 1 to give me some readings on groups 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 for day 2, listed below.

First day I sighted in on the bottom left orange slice, 10 shots using the 250 Scenars. Low and right. I corrected a bit and fired the second group, which is bottom right and 5 shots.

For the Bergers, I started on the bottom row of black targets, second from the left--GP1, then when I knew that the POI wasn't some wild abberation, I moved to the left for GP2 and then three over to GP3 and finally GP4.

Day one, done. I did not clean the rifle at all.

Day two started with a fouled bore on the bottom row, on the far right...GP1 again.

These were loaded to a mag length (for me) of 3.728", for 9 shots (remember the dead case). The chrono wasn't reading until I removed the difusers, so no data on them.

I then moved up the right side, firing 5 shot groups, up to the top row and then right to left, on the top. The target gives you the particulars. The scope wasn't adjusted at all for the seond session.

As I got into the longer seated rounds, particularly on the 3.848" rounds, I noticed that they started shooting off the black and to the left. The wind was zero value and coming into my face, despite me writing "swirling" on the target. It was noticeable, but maybe 5 mph, so I don't think that had anything to do with it, as the flag on the 40' pole behind me was limp. at that time.

I had 1.25 MOA dialed in for LEFT, based on the first fouling group on the first day and had I backed that off, things would have been dandy, but that doesn't jive with the other groups which were shooting nuts on, so I don't know?

I can't explain why the earlier groups were pretty much on center with no wind deflection and the longer ones were off to the left under the same conditions.

I don't know if getting closer to the lands impacted the rounds and shifted them to the left, a bit, but it was odd.

Chrono data for the first 10 shots seated at 3.798" was 2860 fps with a few lower velocities bringing the SD up to 52.6. No bother, it's 100 yds.

Second two groups, I got 7 readings for an average of 2894 fps, for the seating at 3.823" and a SD of 21.1.

My 17 year old Model 1 needs a trip back to Pact for an overhaul, FWIW since it's been glitching randomly for me.

Finally, the last two 5 shot groups at 3.948" registered 7 out of 10 for an average velocity of 2889 fps and a SD of 22.1.

Epilogue:

We all know that just because a cartridge combo shoots MOA at 100 yards, doesn't mean it'll shoot MOA at 1000 yards.

However, if a cartridge combo can only muster 1.5 MOA at 100 yards, it'll never shoot MOA at 1000 yards.

These Berger 250gr Hybrids shoot really well out of my 1:12" Sako TRG-42 and while 100 yards isn't anything to throw a party over, they do shoot accurately at that distance and that's always a good start on the way to 1k, or a mile.

Thanks to Berger, once again.

Chris



 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

<span style="font-weight: bold">Berger 250gr OTM Hybrid Test </span>

I received my two boxes after returning from Florida, so like some of the others mentioned, the timeline was tight to get in everything by today. But we still managed some good days developing a load and testing the results at distance.

Berger338box.jpg


<span style="text-decoration: underline">Initial Load Development </span>

Berger338-1.jpg


I too started my initial load development working up from 88grs of H4831sc, I will not prior to March 1st I ordered 8lbs of H1000 from Midway and as of now it still has not arrived which was disappointing.

I found during my initial load development that 89gr of h4831sc work best at magazine length and 90grs of H4831sc work well when loaded longer.

As a base line for all my testing I used a known load from Southwest Ammo using 250gr Scenars. I have used these out of distances of 2000m so I know they work well. This was my bar for the 250gr Bergers.

Berger338-2.jpg


The platform used was my Accuracy International AWSM with the 1-11 Twist Rate.

Muzzle velocity varied depending on the load and seating depth from 2850fps on the low side to just over 3000fps. These were loaded to 3.8" with 90gr of H4831sc and maintained solid accuracy. However the majority of the loads were shot at Magazine length which I felt was necessary due to the natural of the round. So we loaded them to fit in the Accuracy International AWSM (non-CIP)

Berger338-3.jpg

300 yard group loaded to 3.830" with 90 grs of H4831sc

After we determined a solid load we then moved out to distance in several increments.

The first was at 600 yards where accuracy maintained solid hovering around 1/2 MOA.

Next we moved to 800 yards, which was cut short due to a conflict at the range... (I was reminded by a shooter that odd days at CRC were intended for short range shooting only. )

Finally we ended up at 1000 yards with some remaining rounds loaded at 89grs of H4831sc.

Overall they tracked extremely well and I found no need to tweak the BC in order to match my data to distance.

The trend with the 89gr load followed these details from JBM

Screen-Shot-2012-03-15-at-10.31.02-AM.png


I have just enough of the bullets left over to take with me to Gunsite this week to shoot at distances beyond 1000 yards as well we will have an Acoustic Chronograph on hand to record the data during the extended flight.

But compared to my experience with the 250gr Scenars, I think the Bergers were outstanding at both close and far distances. Loaded long and short they appeared to maintain accuracy well.
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Frank,
I read that you said you felt no need to tweak the BC to follow your data at distance but I noticed that the JBM sheet refects .380 G7 and Berger states .349 G7.?? I'm just curious as in my Delta IV software I use G1 .682 and out to 1000 in my test it was almost right on.
Sully
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 402</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Frank,
I read that you said you felt no need to tweak the BC to follow your data at distance but I noticed that the JBM sheet refects .380 G7 and Berger states .349 G7.?? I'm just curious as in my Delta IV software I use G1 .682 and out to 1000 in my test it was almost right on.
Sully</div></div>

I used the auto function so whatever estimated is what i used... and it tracked well.

12 days is not a lot of time to tweak things, which JBM is apparently a lot higher so where ever JBM got their data is pretty much what I used to try it and it worked out great...

I wouldn't look into too much, changing the BC to .349 only changes the impact 1 MOA at 1000 yards, so how JBM used the estimated worked out better for my loads, my MV was a bit higher too so balancing it out to 2900 over 2850 works the same ... with the lower BC... either way the initial data is used the results were the same.

Move the BC back down, and/or the MV up 50fps equals the same dope.
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Yeah, after I posted I calculated the same with the added velosity. It will be interesting to see how it holds up going out further. You are correct about the time frame alloted I think everyone had to scramble to get what little they got done. Thanks for the info.
Sully
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Curious if anyone has had any feedback from Berger following this. Seems like the consensus is that the time allotted was way too short but that the bullets showed quite well but I would be interested in what Berger's take on all this is.
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CEGA</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Curious if anyone has had any feedback from Berger following this. Seems like the consensus is that the time allotted was way too short but that the bullets showed quite well but I would be interested in what Berger's take on all this is. </div></div>

I received an email back from Michelle and Melesia both thanking me for taking the albeit limited time to give them some feedback.

They're going to send us 200 bullets of our choice and I asked for some more 250s OTM Hybrids.

I'll have more time down the road to shoot them at longer distances, as I'm sure others who asked for more of them, will do.

I'd expect more data to come down the pike as the weather gets nicer.

Chris
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Here's another test result:

Firstly, thanks for your kind consideration in helping customers like me run products through even more real world scenarios- I look forward to seeing others' results soon. Secondly, you should be proud of this new 250gr .338 option- it is exactly what my rifle has been asking for! Thirdly, when can we buy more of these?- I'm out and NEED them!!

These worked so well that I will switch entirely to these in my .338 Edge. I have been running tests after tests of different loads/bullets/primers/lengths etc. etc. to get something better than acceptable in my .338 Edge- It took 9 rounds of a ladder test with H1000 and one seating depth with these 250 OTM's to find a sub half moa group with good speeds! The BC these bullets offer with the speeds I am able to get already will really help my ELR endeavors!

Previously my rifle liked the 300gr hybrid and 92.0 gr of H1000(2850+/-fps, es/sd in single digits usually), 95.5gr H1000 (3000fps+/-) and same distance off the lands (.020") and these 250's just flat out rock n roll.

I would really be curious to see what others running the .338 Edge were seeing for speeds/loads with these. My CED chrono wouldn't pick up the last dozen or so bullets loaded on top of Retumbo as the clouds were rolling in and the sun was dropping behind the mountains quickly...I was just starting to see pressure signs ( medium-flattened primer edges only) at 98.0gr of Retumbo...and there must be a node near there but will need to see what the speeds and ES/SD are doing. COAL for loads seemed to be best around 4.015" which is .020" off the lands for me. When i am able to get more, I will want to try more at 3.7xx"-ish length with a different primer combo(I used CCI 250's), the magazine length rounds I tried had much greater ES/SD numbers and the groups opened up horizontally as well.

At my usual outdoor range, I like to run loads at 550ys and 1020yds for accuracy and consistency....I rarely if ever do anything at less than 550yds there with the 338. The range altitude is at 8200ish feet- so it is a bit like cheating- but I'll take it-temp swings and weather changes are faster too. Using the G7 of .380 matches pretty well with what I was able to produce- 5.7mil come-up for 1020y and 2.4mil for 550yds. Historically, the Berger 300gr have taken 22.1moa/8.2moa on the same pieces of steel. Wind calls seem to be within .1mil of my same calls with the 300gr hybrid at these ranges. (which is easily within my ability as a rifle driver-wind reader) My spots that go past a mile are too snowy/muddy to get to just now-but I am confident these 250's will be the ticket to upping my percentage of hits at 1200yds -2000yds+ especially when I can find a good 3100+fps load.
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Michelle -

Is there any chance that you/Berger could put together a spreadsheet of the load and rifle the various testers used so all of us can get an idea of what was working or not working as starting points etc.? I would think that this type of data would be helpful to everyone.

Thanks!

Carl
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I shot them to 1500 yards last week at Gunsite, my load from the test, and they performed very well.

I need to push them a bit faster, but I had nice consistent load going 2925fps out of my AWSM (1-11) and they grouped sub MOA at 1500.

My Dope was 12.8 Mils to 1500 yards. (25.5 Baro, 60 degrees)

This was with my H4831sc load (3.830" with 90 grs) but I think moving to H1000 would be wiser based on my limited amount of powder I had on hand. Unfortunately I had ordered an 8 LBS jug of H1000 (March 1) and it never showed, and they refunded the order, so I was forced to use H4831sc that I had.

Overall I think they are great replacement for my 250gr Scenar load... They trended well even running them a bit slower... bumping the speed to close to 3050fps should really work out well as long as my accuracy stays in place.
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I got out today and tested another 25 rounds. In all fairness the last test, I just loaded the Bergers as I loaded the SMK which was 20 thou off my lands using the ogive. This time I found the lands with the Bergers. Once this was established, I loaded these loads as follows: with a 5 thou jam, on the lands and with a 5 thou and 10 thou jump. They were shot out to 300 yards in a mild 10mph wind. All rounds used 87gr of H-1000, Lapua brass trimmed to .715. The control group was my standard SMK 20thou off the lands. All groups were 1/2 moa or less. However, in my rifle the BA110, I struck gold just on the lands, this produced the best group beating my pet load "SMK" by a bunch.

This was the group on the lands.

berger300atlands.jpg
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoldenRod</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Just curious...has anyone received the 200 thank you bullets from Berger? </div></div>

Yes, I received mine within a few days of the end of the test period.

Jim G
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

Nope, I was told last week by the Plant Manager that they were having problems getting the quality within standard on the 250 OTM Hybrids and it would be a while longer.
Jim,
Did you get the new 250gr Hybrids??
Sully
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 402</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nope, I was told last week by the Plant Manager that they were having problems getting the quality within standard on the 250 OTM Hybrids and it would be a while longer.
Jim,
Did you get the new 250gr Hybrids??
Sully </div></div>

Yes, I did. pn 33104

Jim G
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I still haven't got my bullets from the test. I requested 200 more of the 338 250 gr Hybrids that I was going to use on my elk hunt in August. I see some venders have them in stock to sell but Michelle at Berger tells me they don't have any ?????
confused.gif

If it was me I would of contacted one of the venders with the 338 Hybrids in stock and said, I need a big favor and send this person 4 boxes of the 338's and Berger will credit you on your next order. just my 2 cents.
I was excited to get more of these and do some more testing
frown.gif

I guess I will just use my Barnes TTSX's for my elk hunt.
Tarey
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I received my 300grainers (338) last month after a long ass wait but they told me it would be awhile because they were back ordered, better late than never plus I wasnt a paying customer this time!
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

I'm still waiting on the 250gr 338 OTMs, but one day I tell ya!

Chris
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

WOW!!!! I can't thank you guys enough for this Topic... I'm just starting out in load developement and will also be using Berger's 250 gr OTM in Lapua Brass... I'm a little disappointed that there was no load data in the manual for this combo, but after reading this and all the choices in powders/grains, I have a good starting point...

Only in the Hide....

Once again Thank you...
 
Re: new Berger 338 cal 250 gr Hybrid - testers needed

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 402</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well I took some these 250gr Hybrids out today and tested them. Below is the load I came up with and it shot really well.

Rifle - Savage 110BA 1:9 twist 26" barrel Suppressed 338P TBAC
Brass - Lapua (3) cylces, Annealed, weigh sorted within 1 grain
F/L sized, trimmed to 2.714"
Primmer - FGMM 215M
Bullet - Berger 250gr Hybrid OTM
Powder - N560 88.4gr
OAL - 3.900" .030" off the lands.
Velosity - 2900fps (excuse the goof on one)
Conditions - 58 degrees, DA 5850, humidity 12% wind is stated on
target.
I tested this load on 3/4/12 and it shot fine @ 100yd with an acceptable ES/SD
DSC00311.jpg

So I decided to test the same load today @ 200yd,It shot fine as well and chronoed the same with good ES/SD
DSC00309.jpg

And then took it out to 300, again shot good (at least to me) with good ES/SD and chrono was 2900.
DSC00315.jpg

I tried H4831SC and it shot well just not as good as the N560 (sad to say for cost reasons)
I also loaded these up .075" off the lands and the groups opened up (.8MOA) and they got even worst when I tried to load to mag length for my CIP mag, (1.25MOA) .164" jump!
I will say they do shot very well and I will tinker around some more but from my initial testing of 30 test loads they are better than the original Hybrids in regards to jump. I'll report back when I get to take this load out further but I hope I can get them to shot out of my mag because that's what I'm looking for with this BC. I might try some H1000 and see how it works. I look forward to seeing and reading more reports so that I might learn some more.
Sully
</div></div>

Sully - If you don't mind me asking:

Do you still feel the same way about N560 for your load? I to was favoring the Vihtavuori Brand as my first choice for powder..

Thanks