Re: 338 LM Accuracy Test and Class @ Gunsite
Let me say this and I will try to be clear,
You are everybit the problem as anyone you mentioned and possibly more so because you are picking a side in the guise of being independent. You came in here uninvited and by your own admission, not participating or assisting the process in any meaningful way. You are creating more doubt and conflict. Purposely I am sure.
Dont you think that because I am having a special purpose barrel built that if everything was ready on my end, Noel's bullets would be listed? I don't care if he only got me 5 I would have shot them, just because.
Yes, this started because of the battles between Noel, Gerard, and the other guy. That everyone was so sick and tired of the petty bickering with nothing to show for it but a bunch of last year's designs that couldn't be used because they were wrong. But once I got involved we expanded the scope and many other companies have stepped up to support us, so those guys are a secondary consideration especially considering they both require custom twist barrels, which are too expensive to noodle around with, but here I am doing it. Just like I stated several times before. If Gerard wasn't such a dick, I would have easily spent my own money to get a custom twist barrel for his stuff too, trust me, I can have one made with little effort or issue. If the support was there I would make sure the barrel was, but immediately, like you he went into attack mode.
There are plenty of bullet makers who want the attention and the support to verify as much as humanly possible. It's not cheap or easy for people to make these kinds of buying decisions when it comes to XLR. So the fact we can do it, and we can try to hold the winds back for people, we said yes. Again, I have explained this but people want to turn this into the ZA / GSC sideshow.
I will give you an example, I have spoken with Stephen from Dynamic Research, his solids did not have stellar numbers the first go. But he didn't get pissy, no, he got interested and wanted to see how he could help flush out the data. That is what we are doing. If I only focused this week on getting the best information possible for the Predator Solids, I would not consider it a wasted week. My stated goal from the beginning was to help cut through the BS and give the reader rock solid data. No agendas, just results. You on the other hand want to disrupt and derail just like GSC. Maybe you need to find a new group of friends to hang around you might get more accomplished.
I agreed to the first round because I have a genuine interest in seeing this progress, no other reason, I use the bullet and I am a fan. The site gives me resources others don't have and this is why this site is successful, because I do exactly this kind of stuff for the right reasons. There is a clue there.
Next you have questions and want to start a fuss, or re-ignite a fire, try PM'ing me first, you'll last longer on here, right now your site life expectancy just got cut in half.