• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

rcamuglia

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 18, 2011
146
1
60
Nuevo Mexico
I've been shooting a Creedmoor for about 3 years. I shot the 139 Lapua for the first barrel's life then switched to the 140 A-Max. The Factory ammo shoots incredibly well.

photo2.jpg


Shot that group and thought it was lucky so I shot another at the next dot just to see....

photo1.jpg


Anyway, the factory stuff shoots like that regularly and in one big hole at 100.

I've always done load development. I either shoot an Audette or shoot groups with fully prepped brass and settled on a good load. I'm pretty happy with the load I have now with the same components as the factory ammo, yet the factory stuff shoots as well or better. The thing is that even though I use the same components as the factory, they are different in dimension or weight from the factory. So, I set out on a quest to duplicate the factory ammo and factory ammo performance.

I took 8 factory rounds and carefully measured everything; OAL to the ogive, brass headspace as compared to my fully formed brass etc. I pulled the bullets and weighed the powder charges. 2 at 41gr, 3 at 41.2gr, 2 at 41.3gr, and one at 41.5gr. Crazy for ammo that shoots that well. Concentricity was also an issue with the factory ammo. It still shoots incredibly.

I know I can weigh more consistently, size cases and seat bullets with very little runout and make better ammo dimensionally than the factory stuff.

First, I seated brand new bullets back into the factory cases with their respective charges and wrote the charge weight of each case on it with a marker. The average charge was 41.2gr of H-4350 with the Fed 210M primer and a 140 A-Max seated to about 2.800" OAL or 3.123" on my comparator to the ogive. I then set out to make ammo keeping those parameters the same.

I loaded 30 rounds at 41.2gr H-4350 with the above dimensions in three different "lots" of 10 cases.

The first lot were fully prepped and fireformed cases (uniformed primer pockets, deburred flash holes, neck turned) that I sized in my Redding FL bushing die with the .289 bushing giving around .002" neck tension, shoulders bumped .0015".

The second lot were once fired (fully fireformed) factory cases with no prep. They were sized with a Redding Competition Neck sizer with the .290 bushing.

The third lot were brand new Hornady cases that I simply ran through a Sinclair expander die to try to control (lessen) neck tension. I checked the concentricity of the handloads and all were pretty good, the neck sized ammo had the least runout practically nonexistent.

Then I went to the indoor tunnel range and did some testing.

First, I shot the factory ammo that I had re-seated new bullets into. I shot them at different aimpoints according to how much powder was in the case (the 2 41's at one point, the 3 41.2's at another, etc). They shot like hell and all I did was pull the bullet, weigh the charge, put it back in and seat a brand new bullet. The only two that "grouped" were the 41.3's.

I then shot round robin groups with the three lots until all 10 of each were fired at their respective aimpoint. I let the barrel cool after every 6 shots.

Lot 2 (neck sized only) brass was the best. After the first 5 shots there were 3 holes at about .3" then the group went to an inch after the next 5 were fired.

Lot 1 (Fully Prepped) was a bigger group about the same shape.

Lot 3 (new brass) was terrible

None shot as well as the factory loaded ammo or my developed handload that differs from the factory in charge, OAL, brass dimensions

They must be using some magic at Hornady that I can't figure out.

If anyone else has been able to duplicate the factory ammo dimensions, components, and performance, please tell me the secret!
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

It could be the lot of your powder. Try bumping up the charge .2 up to 42.0. You should be able to find an accuracy node.

I believe the box says 41.5. I use 41.9 on mine.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

Vary your charges more and stop sweating all that brass prep, culling and other voodoo. Hornady damn sure ain't doing that when they're ramming new ammo together. I have tried all that shit and came to the conclusion that if you have a good node and decent concentricty most of the other shit don't matter. I believe that's why fgmm shoots so good in almost every 308. It's designed around a know accuracy node.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

I pulled a couple of bullets from my box of factory loading and the both weighed 42.4

Shot my new Creedmoor for the first time today. The factory ammo shot like crap until I figured out the problem. I had my Atlas deployed at 45 degrees and for some reason I couldn't get any consistency, probably my form. Once I deployed the bipod to 90 degrees everything shrunk up. I tested loads from 41.9 to 42.7 and everthing hovered around .5moa. I'm going to start all over at 41.5 now that I have about 60 rounds through the new tube. 42.4 averaged around 2815. I was hoping to get to 2850. I'm sure the barrel will speed up a bit after another 100 rnds or so.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gau17</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It could be the lot of your powder. Try bumping up the charge .2 up to 42.0. You should be able to find an accuracy node.

I believe the box says 41.5. I use 41.9 on mine. </div></div>

Maybe I wasn't as clear as I had thought...

I did say that I do have a very good load for my 6.5 Creedmoor, but I found it by doing development as I normally do. Here's some good groups that it produces:

image.jpg


As you can see my load is different from the factory ammo in that the bullet is backed off .030", the brass is fully fire formed, and the powder charge is .4gr more.

200 yard 4-shot group:

59208b32.jpg


550 yard 3 shot group:

f33e4a36.jpg


Those are all shot with my handload.

My question and the thing that I don't understand is why I can't load my ammo with the exact same parameters as the factory ammo (OAL, charge, new brass) and get the same results as the factory ammo. The dimensions of my brass, OAL, Charge are all different than the factory ammo but yields the same accuracy.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

youre using the exact same powder/primer brand as hornady? That would be the only difference from the things listed.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeff1383</div><div class="ubbcode-body">youre using the exact same powder/primer brand as hornady? That would be the only difference from the things listed.</div></div> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeff1383</div><div class="ubbcode-body">youre using the exact same powder/primer brand as hornady? That would be the only difference from the things listed.</div></div>

Yes, all components are the same.

Maybe a better question is why does the Hornady factory ammo shoot so well given that they use new, loose-fitting brass, have inconsistent powder charges, and concentricity isn't the greatest?
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo



Yes, all components are the same.

Maybe a better question is why does the Hornady factory ammo shoot so well given that they use new, loose-fitting brass, have inconsistent powder charges, and concentricity isn't the greatest? [/quote]
Magic? Just kidding...I measured some of their 6.5 grendel ammo (which I shot then re-loaded) and found the ogive measurement to be spot on every round of the box I had. Would lead me to believe that would be the only factor.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

i was at a advanced reloading class at camp perry given by hornady. the class was taught by dale emery. he stated, "for service rifle reloading none of the trick techniques for accuracy really help. case weighing, primer pocket uniforming, case neck turning all have little effect at 600 yards, except for the benchrest group." i thought the head of marketing, who was in the back of the room,would faint.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

Its going to come down to the velocity you are generating. Chrono the factory stuff that shoots well then chrono your loads. If your loads are not producing the same velocities tweak them so they do with your powder. Neck tension, seating depth, and how many times the brass has been fired can all change the pressures generated.

The pressure a lot of powder generates can change lot to lot by a decent amount. I would guess hornady gets in large batches of powder, tests them and adjusts them as necessary to produce rounds that are both safe in a variety of conditions and produce the velocity they want.

If you dont have a chrono then its all just guessing and all this work will fizzle when you have to go buy some more powder.
 
Re: Duplicating Hornady Factory 6.5 Creedmoor Ammo

I'll throw in another vote for powder lot. I've seen nodes vary by as much as a grain from lot to lot using benchmark in a .22-250. The lot I currently have seems to be slower than any previous lots I've shot since I need more powder to duplicate my prior results in every load I've worked up. When I've worked with 4350, I've seen more lot to lot variation than this.

Some rifles are picky about different things, figure out what thatis for your rifle and make sure that stays the same. My .22-250 won't shoot well unless the bullets are just off the lands. My dads .22-250 likes bullets seated to standard length. Mine also likes max loads plus while his shoots the best a grain or so under max.

Personally, I wouldn't get hung up on duplicating factory specs. I'd figure out what my rifle likes and shoot the hell out of it.