Re: LAPD spray and pray
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: desertrat1979</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mo_Zam_Beek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: desertrat1979</div><div class="ubbcode-body">For those that want to criticize the lack of shooting skills. How many of you were involved in a stressful situation where one well placed shot ended the situation and you were the hero of the day? Anybody?
</div></div>
Laughable. The job description is 'protect and serve'. Paper pushers that can type and regurgitate law - can serve. You need to be able fight and shoot to protect.
If they can't, they shouldn't be there. Part of the problem is LE quals - they are generally static, stress free events that test minimum skill sets. And yet if you attend them you will see officers that could fuck up a steel ball. That is inexcusable. New policy: shit got harder and if you choose not to put the work in on your own to prove mastery during quals - you need to seek out a new job.
Good luck</div></div>
Good luck with that one. As it was stated earlier, some of these guys are not gun guys, and aside from quals, have little to no interest in handling their weapons. I agree that its on them to do their part. In one academy I attended range/quals were a week long (actual range not classroom time), and I logged over 1k rounds through my duty pistol, shooting movers, stress shooting, fire from cover,ect.. We had one guy, who I was amazed that he passed. He said it the first practice run, "I'm not a gun guy". But he passed. There are soldiers that make it passed basic that didn't qualify at 100%, doctors (including yours) that didn't graduate with honors, EMT's that didn't get a flawless score in their final test, and not all firemen made it to the top of the ladder first. How is it so acceptable that a cop must be held to such a high standard when their job is no more or less crucial to the others I mentioned. If any one of those can screw up, lives can be lost. How is this so different? You got some high expectations, only hope you are not disappointed in life all the time.
Not to mention the crying that would take place if all cops were to become expert marksman, or skilled fighters. I read a statement in another thread a while ago were some clown was bitching about cops wearing BDU's and used an AR15. Then it goes from being to "well trained" to "not far from becoming a police state". At least thats the average balance here these days. There is no happy medium. And as far as this thread goes, its the same people, who either want to poke fun and laugh and say "ha ha what a screw up" or ctiticize how they know how to do the job better, because thats how they feel it should have been done. Keyboard quarterbacking is actually a lower skill set than armchair quarterbacking. And most folks doing either one, sorry to say, arent qualified for either.
</div></div>
The reason that police must be held to higher standards, is that they are dispatched with firearms to deal with violence in a professional matter, in areas where innocent civilians may be hurt by a lack of training on their part.
Any policeman who cannot shoot, or physically fight, does him/herself a disservice. If a dept offers little to no training, I would suggest seeking it out for themselves, as many do, cuz its "their ass".
Edit to add: If someone isn't a gun guy, I think that detracts from their ability to use one adeptly in the line of duty. They should find another means of public service if they like.