• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Suppressors Suppressed Ruger vs Air Pistol

Re: Suppressed Ruger vs Air Pistol

Whereas it is always great to see some one do something that represents thoughtful and skilled craftsmanship, there is much more to the Amphibian than what you mentioned in your vid and some "facts" to correct.

You mentioned that the Amphibian shoots CCI minimags at 900 feet per second. Lets start there. The whole idea behind an integral is to create a controlled condition that maximizes subsonic velocities, in other words, get the velocity to transonic. The Amphibian does not recommend CCI minimags as it would be a complete waste of money. Why? Because the Amphibian's whole design is based on porting enough gas to make high velocity (not super high Stingers) bullets go approx 1050 fps. And do it uniformly each and every time.
Extraordinarily, the Amphibian is louder with rounds both higher and lower in velocity than hv. In other words, standard velocity rounds are remarkably louder. The pistol wants its speced ammo.

Aside from getting the benefits of subsonic projectile flight signature reduction we get; maximization of range, maximization of terminal force and, equally important, the purge pressures to keep the can's chambers clean. But there is more, a very important aspect of the Amphibian. The barrel is placed under compression, making the barrel more accurate. There are few .22 pistols as accurate as the Amphibian.

An actual Amphibian is remarkably quiet. To be fair to your air pistol, you need to place your thumb over the amphibian slide when you fire, sealing the chamber and rendering it as a single shot. This is especially true for the MARK III. In this model Ruger changed the basic Ruger barrel chamber, ruining suppression by increasing chamber pop, significantly. The Ruger Mark III is the sloppiest chamber yet.

Nice work and thanks for sharing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZCa4AZmn4g&feature=related

..
 
Re: Suppressed Ruger vs Air Pistol

I was careful to say in the video that my pistol is significantly different than the Amphibian.

All I have been able to find out the Amphibian is that the baffle stack is part stainless and part aluminum, the barrel is shortened and ported. I read somewhere that Mini-mags go about 900 fps; if this is true or false I do not know. I did not actually state anything about the Amphibian as fact other than a few dimensions since I actually know very little about the Amphibian and have never held or shot one.

The video you linked to is impressive, but over the years it has become obvious to me that YouTube videos are a very poor medium for comparing silencers. The video you linked to was also shot in the open whereas mine was shot in an enclosed area.

I have shot my Ruger MKii and others like the 10/22 while holding the action closed. I still get a clicking noise as well as degraded accuracy as the uncomfortable grip on the piece always throws me off. Shooting a semi-auto as a single shot is not for me.
smile.gif


I am not aware of any sound, accuracy or velocity data on the Amphibian. If anyone has any, I would love to see it. What ammo is recommended in it?

Thank you for the constructive comments.

Ranb
 
Re: Suppressed Ruger vs Air Pistol

I located some data on the Amphibian I and Amphibian II in Al Paulson's Silencer History and Performance Volume One published in 1996.

It describes them as capable of noise reduction as high as 39 decibels. It also goes into further detail describing how good they perform. It is impressive.

Paulson’s book compared the Amphibian to the Ruger MKII with a 5" barrel. The unsuppressed pistol shot Federal HV at 1048 FPS and Hansen SV at 958 FPS. <span style="text-decoration: underline">Paulson says the Amphibian I is 834/794 FPS and the Amphibian II is 835/760 FPS.</span> This is a 36% reduction in muzzle energy. I have no idea what ammo performs best in the Amphibian or if it was used in the tests described by Paulson.

As far as I know the Hansen ammo is not available anymore, but it might be similar to other std vel ammo like the CCI std vel. This data is at least 16 years old so it would be nice to have more recent data. If I ever get a chance to shoot a real Amphibian, I will shoot it over a chronograph as well as for accuracy.

Since I lack the tools and know-how to properly port a barrel and wanted to retain the 1000 to 1100 fps velocities of HV ammo in a pistol with a 5" barrel, I decided to leave the barrel at 4.75" and unported. All I had to do was turn it down to mount the silencer and re-cut the crown after I was done; both very easy to do with my limited skills on the lathe.

This meant I had to go with a longer overall length to ensure I got the suppression I wanted, but this was a small price to pay for making something myself. I am also able to completely disassemble the silencer for a good cleaning. I have read that the Amphibian is only partly user serviceable but re-builds are well supported by the factory. I have yet to hear of an unsatisfied customer.

Ranb
 
Re: Suppressed Ruger vs Air Pistol

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ranb</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I located some data on the Amphibian I and Amphibian II in Al Paulson's Silencer History and Performance Volume One published in 1996.

It describes them as capable of noise reduction as high as 39 decibels. It also goes into further detail describing how good they perform. It is impressive.

Paulson’s book compared the Amphibian to the Ruger MKII with a 5" barrel. The unsuppressed pistol shot Federal HV at 1048 FPS and Hansen SV at 958 FPS. <span style="text-decoration: underline">Paulson says the Amphibian I is 834/794 FPS and the Amphibian II is 835/760 FPS.</span> This is a 36% reduction in muzzle energy. I have no idea what ammo performs best in the Amphibian or if it was used in the tests described by Paulson.

As far as I know the Hansen ammo is not available anymore, but it might be similar to other std vel ammo like the CCI std vel. This data is at least 16 years old so it would be nice to have more recent data. If I ever get a chance to shoot a real Amphibian, I will shoot it over a chronograph as well as for accuracy.

Since I lack the tools and know-how to properly port a barrel and wanted to retain the 1000 to 1100 fps velocities of HV ammo in a pistol with a 5" barrel, I decided to leave the barrel at 4.75" and unported. All I had to do was turn it down to mount the silencer and re-cut the crown after I was done; both very easy to do with my limited skills on the lathe.

This meant I had to go with a longer overall length to ensure I got the suppression I wanted, but this was a small price to pay for making something myself. I am also able to completely disassemble the silencer for a good cleaning. I have read that the Amphibian is only partly user serviceable but re-builds are well supported by the factory. I have yet to hear of an unsatisfied customer.

Ranb
</div></div>

Ranb,

Nice to see somebody care enough to do the work.

Lets take it from the top.

Its true that back in 1996 the Amphibian stack had a much more consequential impact on velocity. In fact, back then the number of ports on the barrel were considerable. That balancing act continued through numerous variations. Interestingly, when that was written, the film "Assassins" with Stallone and Banderas was filmed. All the suppression work in the film was recorded as is. So, if you want, you can hear the gen I and gen II's as they really sounded by renting the flick. Yes, movie quiet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIMYA1KBubA

Having said that, significant changes occurred in the stack and porting through four more iterations. Ports went from many to, in some instances one, and velocity increased. The 1995/96 cans did not use compression. You can see the difference in diameter between can and barrel in the film. Remember, AWC has been making cans for 30+ years, things improve all the time. When Paulson's work was published, AWC was on the cover of both volumes.

Some of the earlier Amphibians came back from places around the world for rebuilds and upgrades. My favorite was hearing about a can from Guatemala with credible 40,000,000 rounds through it with directions for an upgrade and no cosmetic refinishing. This veteran had survived returning fire while being soaked in gasoline with his Amphibian. He could barely be parted with it. I actually spoke with this guy after returning from Afghanistan with the same Amphibian, extraordinary person.

Hansen, yes Jay Hansen is alive. The ammo is sold under PMC incredibly it all started with equipment left behind in Viet Nam. He still remains very active and is a wealth of firearms information. When one needs to know exactly, go to Jay. Great, trustworthy guy.

http://www.hansenguns.com/

Hansen at work quite a while ago. Jay worked 40 steps from the old Ruger Headquarters. He knew the Ruger family and, like a lot of folks, grew up in the "Armory State" literally surrounded by arms and makers.

f0.jpg



 
Re: Suppressed Ruger vs Air Pistol

So does anyone have any velocity data for the recent Amphibians? If I can improve suppression and reduce length, I might try to duplicate their design as long as I do not patently rip them off.

I can even do it without another tax stamp as long as I only shorten things and not lengthen or replace parts. I will find someone to port the barrel instead of doing it myself, the last time I tried to port a barrel it did not turn out well.

Ranb
 
Re: Suppressed Ruger vs Air Pistol

My Ruger MKII is a 4.5" Paclite. It has a snap on 6.3" checkmate suppressor, and is 10.4" long with the suppressor snapped on. In about a second it can be removed, allowing it to be a normal sized pistol for storage and holstered carry.

The 12" tube on that one is huge. It sounds good but the size is a little like a short rifle.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Here's a video of my Ruger with the old baffle core- the can now has Checkmate II baffles and is ~6-10DB more quiet. the video below is the newer baffles with the same pistol and suppressor. </span>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xFKAIbAt2M#t=6m19s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSyx_c0abtA#t=27s