Does this look familiar

[Maggot]

When I watched this it brought badk a really unpleasant memory, and some uncomfortable questions. Anyone else see what I see. If you can post the actual video please do.


[video:yahoo]http://news.yahoo.com/video/amazing-footage-chinas-biggest-demolition-143008113.html[/video]

 

[klf]

Re: Does this look familiar

Oh come on Magster you are not one of the 911 inside job nuts are you. Those buildings in New York fell from the top down. You know the part that was burning! The ones in China blew in several locations at once like most demolitions do. We cant even count on the SEALS to keep quiet on whacking Osama. There would already be a dozen books out on how "I" knocked down the towers by Studly Mudfuck. How could they pull it off in the first place, the timing and coordination would be staggering. It would have been easier to dump anthrax out on the street and fake evidence pointing at whoever they wanted to. Besides there still cleaning up from faking the moon landings right!. Remember they had to fake them 6 and one half (apollo 13) times. Like Buzz said, "It was easier to go to the moon than to fake it."

 

[Queequeg]

Re: Does this look familiar

One really has to work to believe a conspiratorial act of demolition is more possible than the much more probable explanation: that airplanes almost completely full of jet fuel, crashed into buildings in the highest quarters of their structure, destroyed the fire sprinkler systems and burned (for weeks). The structural damage caused by the impacts of the planes coupled with the loss of temper to the structural steel caused a failure of the support to carry the load yielding to a catastrophic vertical failure.

It is what happened.

 

[Maggot]

Re: Does this look familiar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: klf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Oh come on <span style="color: #CC0000">Magster </span> you are not one of the 911 inside job nuts are you. Those buildings in New York fell from the top down. You know the part that was burning! The ones in China blew in several locations at once like most demolitions do. We cant even count on the SEALS to keep quiet on whacking Osama. There would already be a dozen books out on how "I" knocked down the towers by Studly Mudfuck. How could they pull it off in the first place, the timing and coordination would be staggering. It would have been easier to dump anthrax out on the street and fake evidence pointing at whoever they wanted to. Besides there still cleaning up from faking the moon landings right!. Remember they had to fake them 6 and one half (apollo 13) times. Like Buzz said, "It was easier to go to the moon than to fake it." </div></div>

Magster, I like it. Almost like 'magazine' and I dont mean the readable kind.

And QQ, despite your infinite and absolute knowledge on every subject, the question remains open in my mind. Not drawing any conclusions, just leaving it open. Something you should try...an open mind.

 

[Queequeg]

Re: Does this look familiar

The purpose of an open mind is for the acquisition and processing of facts and highly probable hypothesis, upon which it may close until such time as unequivocal fact, or highly probable new information, is shown to demonstrate revision is in order.

One who feels obligated to consider all manner of remotely possible nonsense, superstition or anything other than the above has either an abundance of time at his disposal or a very low threshold for credulity.

Following your inference, one may fairly argue that pretty near to anything Rosie ODonell or Jesse Ventura says must be considered? I'm comfortable continuing to treat it as profit motivated horse shit.

 

[Wolvenhaven]

Re: Does this look familiar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: queequeg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The purpose of an open mind is for the acquisition and processing of facts and highly probable hypothesis, upon which it may close until such time as unequivocal fact, or highly probable new information, is shown to demonstrate revision is in order.

One who feels obligated to consider all manner of remotely possible nonsense, superstition or anything other than the above has either an abundance of time at his disposal or a very low threshold for credulity.

Following your inference, one may fairly argue that pretty near to anything Rosie ODonell or Jesse Ventura says must be considered? I'm comfortable continuing to treat it as profit motivated horse shit.
</div></div>

I had a teacher who used to say "Always have an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out."

 

[BALLISTIC]

Re: Does this look familiar

http://www.ae911truth.org/

 

[klf]

Re: Does this look familiar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: queequeg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The purpose of an open mind is for the acquisition and processing of facts and highly probable hypothesis, upon which it may close until such time as unequivocal fact, or highly probable new information, is shown to demonstrate revision is in order.

One who feels obligated to consider all manner of remotely possible nonsense, superstition or anything other than the above has either an abundance of time at his disposal or a very low threshold for credulity.

Following your inference, one may fairly argue that pretty near to anything Rosie ODonell or Jesse Ventura says must be considered? I'm comfortable continuing to treat it as profit motivated horse shit.

+1



</div></div>

 

[Veer_G]

Re: Does this look familiar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: klf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: queequeg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The purpose of an open mind is for the acquisition and processing of facts and highly probable hypothesis, upon which it may close until such time as unequivocal fact, or highly probable new information, is shown to demonstrate revision is in order.

One who feels obligated to consider all manner of remotely possible nonsense, superstition or anything other than the above has either an abundance of time at his disposal or a very low threshold for credulity.

Following your inference, one may fairly argue that pretty near to anything Rosie ODonell or Jesse Ventura says must be considered? I'm comfortable continuing to treat it as profit motivated horse shit.</div></div>+1 </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: klf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> There would already be a dozen books out on how "I" knocked down the towers by Studly Mudfuck.</div></div>

Not to go too OT from such a riveting exchange, but one, who's Studly, and two, just where <span style="font-style: italic">is</span> "Moo-moo Land"?

 

[Maggot]

Re: Does this look familiar

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: queequeg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The purpose of an open mind is for the acquisition and processing of facts and highly probable hypothesis, upon which it may close until such time as unequivocal fact, or highly probable new information, is shown to demonstrate revision is in order.

One who feels obligated to consider all manner of remotely possible nonsense, superstition or anything other than the above has either an abundance of time at his disposal or a very low threshold for credulity.

Following your inference, one may fairly argue that pretty near to anything Rosie ODonell or Jesse Ventura says must be considered? I'm comfortable continuing to treat it as profit motivated horse shit.





</div></div>

Ive never met a person I wasnt able to learn something from. That said, Im sure you be much more open to the wisdom of Rush or Bill ORielly.

 

[EddieNFL]

Re: Does this look familiar

I have a friend who is confident a plane never struck the Pentagon. Apparently, the government went to great lengths to pay several hundred people to pretend to be eyewitnesses to the crash. As QQ mentioned, I'm amazed they have all held their tongues.