Re: Scope torque wrench
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: _shawn_</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: kortik</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: _shawn_</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i can understand standing by your product but the amount of contempt for the op in kortiks post just put me off. maybe i'm being overly sensitive </div></div>
Completely off topic post, and exclusively for _shawn_:
I happen to be a mechanical engineer with 30+ years experience. So, having all this luggage on my shoulders, I'm used to look at technical things very straight forward. Old engineers like myself do develop, sometimes, a bit of attitute - got to use right tool for the right job, etc... So, when I hear that the person with moldmaker background (which usually means having professional level of mechanical skills) mentions fish scale as means of QC (in this case, verification of the accuracy of the torque tool), this sounds, sorry to say, not very professional to me. It is also my strong belief that HF tools are not suitable for doing work on such precise and somewhat delicate mechanisms as rifles, scopes, etc... So, right or wrong, however you want to look at it, I've jumped on OP w/o giving too much thought that he may be in a bit different situation.
I do believe that I'm correct on all technical points, and OP was wrong comparing Borka and HF on price points w/o cpnsidering the difference between tools. Having said this, I do think now that I probably should have posted my reply in somewhat different manner, tailored to sound less juicy. This is with consideration to a simple fact of life that some people tend to take sarcasm or even attempt at humor as offence or sign of contempt.
Hope this puts an end to you having an issue with my reply.
</div></div>
ya most engineers i know have that attitude, especially the younger crowd(who incidentally generally leave my job sites in tears after being told exactly how stupid they are and how much they're brand new engineering degree means to me). kinda wish there were more old engineers around. the younger generation is just stupid....or atleast the 1's i deal with are.
i completely understand the right tool for the right job. you should see my garage. if my house was robbed today and they didn't think to look in the garage i'd be completely ok with that and probably wouldn't bother the insurance company or cops but if they got the garage too i'd be crushed financially/emotionally. seeing the op post up that he used a harbor freight torque wrench on a gsxr1000 motor makes me fear for the riders safety. anybody using a $20 chinese torque wrench on a motor that spins 10,000 rpms even if it's just on assembling the head shouldn't be working on motors.
the bad thing about the internet is it is sometimes hard to judge how the poster is trying to come across. i don't have any issues with your product, hell i even promoted it a couple posts up and it really is a great design and kudo's to you for coming up with it and at the pricepoint your selling it, i just have issues with people who talk down to people/potential customers, even when those people/potential customers manage to put their foot in their mouth
honestly i'll probably still buy your product because it really is a good design and i've been eyeballing it since i bought my scope last month but seeing as how i have the tools at home to do the job i'll probably wait till i actually need it to make my life easier
</div></div>
Actually the motor spins to 12k RPM.
I've been rebuilding IC motors for 35 years and machining/fabricating for 30 years.
Anytime you would like to challenge my knowledge of machining, design, solid modeling, CAM, internal combustion, etc, I'll be glad to school you.
Incidentally, genius, OP means original poster. Try to master the vocabulary before you spout off, it just makes you look more ignorant.
Joe