Rifle Scopes Eotech or Aimpoint?

[Leo77]

<span style="font-size: 11pt"><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">Im still undecided for this new AR!
Considering the Aimpoint CompM3 or the Eotech EXPS3 or 556?
Would need for CQB but also need @100yd moa.
Thinking Eotech might be better for quick acquisition but not sure if I prefer Aimpoints single dot or Eotech 65 recticle.
Aimpoint: 5 year battery life.
Aimpoint T1 is just a little too small IMO.
I will also be using the Optic with Night Vision.
I would Appreciate feedback from guys who have the Aimpoint CompM3/Eotech EXPS3 or 556?
Both are durable, Which is more Durable, Etc?
Thanks Mu</span>ch
</span>

 

[Captain Kirk]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

The Eotech is designed to take more abuse to the body of the optic, but you need to ask yourself how much abuse do you intend to dish and is it the most important factor. I use a T1 and like the compact size, I have left it on and come back to it weeks latter and its still running bright. The Eotech is a more robust unit than the T1 or CompM3, I prefer the 65 moa and dot of the Eotech over the single dot of the Aimpoint, as well as the multiple aiming points/BDC of the Eotech. They will both serve you well.

Kirk R

 

[kpr814]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I personally run an Aimpoint Comp M3 with a 2MOA dot. I like just have the one dot and with it being 2MOA it makes head shots at 100yrds on a TQ19 target a breeze. For me the Eotech is way too busy inside.

Also, in working with my departments patrol rifle program I have seen several officers who constantly have to re-zero their Eotechs from month to month. I don't know if this is from bouncing around in their cars or what is going on.

I have never had a problem with my Aimpoint.

 

[Leo77]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

<span style="font-size: 11pt"><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">I Definetely would not want to have to Re-Zer</span>o every Month!</span>

 

[BobD]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I don't think it's likely you will have to reset your zero with an Eotech often; certainly not once a month. I would think that a recurring problem like that would indicate; a mounting or rail issue, changing to ammo of significant weight difference or some outside variable.

As long as the mount is pushed forward against the recoil lug when tightening down it should be snug, without even the slightest movement. Protection from the internals is quite beastly (other than the battery compartment) and the adjustments are neither sensitive or in a place that would likely be accidentally bumped off.

I believe there can be freak occurrences with either design where you will here accounts of issues in different areas. I don't think the current designs of either suffer from any major malfucntions and both will endure whatever environments you are likely to be in.

They are both top notch products. Figure out which design/profile you like better in regards to size and weight, the controls, FOV (for NV or Magnifier) and the reticle. There just different systems; your preference for the reticle will be a deciding factor. If worse comes to worst, they both hold their value well and of could recoup the majority of your money back. Could also try buying or obtaing both and just returning the one ou least favor-

It's a win win either way-

 

[HD1911]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

Having tried all the different Eotechs and Aimpoints, I Absolutely like the T1 Micro the best, hands down.

 

[Tacticalrum]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I have no experience with aimpoint but I love my eotech and don't have any problem with zero.

 

[insight3b]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I like the aimpoint more probably because I was issued an M68. I have seen two different eotechs detach themselves while the weapon was being fired. Eotechs are easier for me to make precise hits with. The AA model eotechs are a lot cheaper than A comp M4. With all that being said I still prefer an aimpoint

 

[Mil.Dot]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I prefer Aimpoints for battery life and better reported durability.

If you are considering the M3 and want 2MOA, you could also look at the PRO and save some money (2MOA, night vision compatible, $400 or less).

 

[abilliott]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

In no means am I an expert here but I can say that I have seen, not just heard people say more problems with eotechs. I do know some people that absolutely love them....my brother-in-law being one. It seems like every-time we shoot he has got some issue with his or the batteries are dead which to me is the single best reason to get an aimpoint......turn it on and don't turn it off you'll pick your weapon up 6 months from now and your dot in the aimpoint will still be burning@!

 

[BillyGoatMachine]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I have 3 eotech's and 2 aimpoints. One of my eotech's is failing now after 3 years of light use. Aimpoint's are still running strong.

 

[samnev]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I had 2 Eotech's 512 & 552. 1 Aimpoint an ML3. Even though the Aimpoint has much better battery life I much prefer the Eotech's. Aimpoint has been traded off. Eotech's still running strong after 5 years.

 

[jerseymike]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I prefer the eotech over the ap for its reticle. I can pick up the 65 moa circle faster than the 2 or 4 moa dot in the ap. All depends on use, 65 moa circle with the 1 moa dot for cqb works good for me. Quicker target aquisition especially with multiple targets

 

[fdkay]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I prefer the aimpoint, primarily for battery life and an uncluttered view.

I kind of like being able to leave the sight on for 3+ years and not worry about the battery.

We were serving a dope warrant last month, Deputy that was assisting us pulled out his AR with EOTech for perimeter and his battery was dead.

Both are very good sights though.

 

[BobD]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I must say I'm quite surprised with the large portion of accounts that have witnessed issues with an Eotech. I've heard of others having issues with battery contact to terminals but have never had the issue myself or seen one hiccup.

As I understood before, it was just a very small percentage, no more significant than the lemon here and there from most manufacturers. It would seem with a much larger sample size that this becomes more apparent. I do not have the military background that some of you gentleman have to witness anywhere near the same volume of usage. It sounds like a bigger problem than I understood it to be.


I was also under the impression that the transversely mounted battery in the xps/exps was designed (in part) to prevent loss in contact from being a liability. You would figure if it was such an issue they would have tried to redo the battery compartment on the other models as well, even with something simple or inexpensive. Thats unfortunate. Has anyone felt the newer design to be unreliable?

 

[NateD33]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

+1 for Aimpoint T1 2 moa, I was skeptical at first too. Once you get used to it, it's fast for CQB and reliable at long range. I even run mine with the Aimpoint 3X magnifier with a LaRue flip to side mount, which is the best system I have ran to date. It also has you covered for night vision compatibility. I suggest you find somewhere you can use the options you have narrowed yourself down to and see what fits you and your mission requirements best. But out of all my friends to include myself that have used both eotech and aimpoint, all of us prefer aimpoints to run on our carbines.

 

[VKC]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I have both an EoTech and Aimpoint comp m4. I think my eyes catch the Eotech reticle slightly faster and but I like that the Aimpoint uses a standard AA battery. I found that magnifier for Eotech does not hold zero as well as Aimpointl, not the reticle but the actual magnifier, as it distorts the image slightly if not centered. Overall it's close but I would choose aimpoint comp m4.

 

[KTDLS7]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

My one and only never to buy another Eotech again is on a toy gun. Aimpoint on my other guns. Besides, Eotech CS was less than expected. On another note, I wonder why all Eotechs were replaced with Aimpoints on our local SWAT rifles? Do a search - this has been extensively debated before - Aimpoint for the win.

Kevin

 

[997/2man]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

Aimpoint.


T1 or Mk 4s.

 

[corey4]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

i do not have either, but have considered, and played with both. i went with a vortex pst 1-4 instead. no technology to fail...just glass and metal.

but of the 2 red dots, i would choose the aimpoint.

 

[basspro]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

Aimpoint. I have had both and currently am running the T1. Battery life is the big difference. The single dot is easier for me to use.

 

[K_4c]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

T1 matched with an LT660. There's a reason why this set up is so popular... it works and it works well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1L-HyathPY&feature=youtu.be

 

[Jäger Wilhelm]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I have both (Comp M4s and EXPS3-0) but I prefer the Aimpoint. I find it to be more robust, prefer the battery setup, and like the single dot for faster target acquisition.

 

[Timl]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I have had an eotech 553 on my m4 for 3 years and have been happy with the reticle, quality and features. I don't think you can go wrong either way. In addition, the 553 has the quick release feature and I was surprised how it always returns very close to the original zero. The 556 is close to the design of the 553.

 

[kingjr]

Re: Eotech or Aimpoint?

I have both and like them both alot. I do like the 1moa dot inside the 65moa circle. I think it really aids in fast target aquisition. Especially in bright sunlight. I give the Aimpoint the nod for shooting after dark. Battery life is definately better on Aimpoints.