Re: What was the '94 ban like?
My recollections:
- The really cool semi-auto rifles were no longer sold due to the '89 import ban, so the '94 AWB <span style="font-style: italic">in comparison</span> seemed like a relatively minor hassle with regards to black rifles.
- Full-capacity magazines were expensive and difficult to find (exception: HK91 mags could be had for $2-3/each, because there were far more mags than rifles).
- Pistol designs changed from big full-size double-stack "wonder nines" to smaller carry pieces with mag capacity of 10 rounds or less (the Glock 26 is a great example of this downsizing). There also seemed to be a large resurgence in the popularity of the 1911, and larger cartridges (the idea at the time being that 10 rounds of .45ACP was better than 10 rounds of 9mm, all else being equal).
- All of the wild "assault pistols" disappeared from the market. The guy that would occasionally show up at the range with a Tec9, MAC-10, or Calico drew a lot of attention, and these pistols went for kinda stupid money when they came on the market.
- Big revolvers because rather popular, in lieu of high-cap semi-auto pistols.
- There was a big gap in price between "pre-ban" and "post-ban" ARs and other black rifles; a far bigger gap than most shooters were willing to pay for a collapseable/folding stock, bayo lug, flash hider, etc.
- A lot of people argued about what constituted a "muzzle brake" and what was a "flash hider". I seem to recall that the ATF Tech Branch would issue rulings on this.
Keep in mind that one could still walk into a gun shop and buy a brand-new AR; it was just a bit neutered compared to what we have today. This new ban, if it passes, will be much worse.