• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Rifle Scopes I got it...

Dustin1984

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 7, 2012
57
0
39
Alberta, Canada
Picked up my first Nightforce scope. It's an NXS 3.5-15x50 without ZeroStop. Now I just need rings...

I stuck a level on my rail though, and noticed there's a slight dip in the center... Unless there's something that can be done about that, it looks like I'll probably have to lap my rings when I get them, though I'll for sure throw the alignment bars in there to see if I actually have to worry about it or not.
 
Re: I got it...

Where exactly is this 'dip' you are talking about? What rail is it?
 
Re: I got it...

Well the rail wont be level as its 20MOA its canted it should be higher at the back then closer to the muzzle. Thats how it is supposed to be. If you can get a picture showing the dip I am sure we can give you a better idea of whats wrong.
 
Re: I got it...

well no shit it won't be level... but the point is there is an ever so slight bend in it. throw a straight edge on it and there's a gap in the middle while contacting the edge on both ends of the rail. I don't know how much more clearly that can possibly be stated.
 
Re: I got it...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dustin1984</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Picked up my first Nightforce scope. It's an NXS 3.5-15x50 without ZeroStop. Now I just need rings...

I stuck a level on my rail though, and noticed there's a slight dip in the center... Unless there's something that can be done about that, it looks like I'll probably have to lap my rings when I get them, though I'll for sure throw the alignment bars in there to see if I actually have to worry about it or not. </div></div>

You probably shouldn't have used the word "level" . The descriptor should have been FLAT. That would have avoided all confusion. Jus Sayn !
grin.gif
 
Re: I got it...

Sounds like you need to bed the base to the receiver. Loosen up the rear screws and see if there is a gap under the base. If not try the front. Lots of info here to see how to do it.
 
Re: I got it...

No need to be a dick, if you don't wont people's opinions/advice, don't post a problem on this forum.
 
Re: I got it...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dustin1984</div><div class="ubbcode-body">well no shit it won't be level... but the point is there is an ever so slight bend in it. throw a straight edge on it and there's a gap in the middle while contacting the edge on both ends of the rail. I don't know how much more clearly that can possibly be stated. </div></div>
lol
 
Re: I got it...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tahoe333</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dustin1984</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Picked up my first Nightforce scope. It's an NXS 3.5-15x50 without ZeroStop. Now I just need rings...

I stuck a level on my rail though, and noticed there's a slight dip in the center... Unless there's something that can be done about that, it looks like I'll probably have to lap my rings when I get them, though I'll for sure throw the alignment bars in there to see if I actually have to worry about it or not. </div></div>

You probably shouldn't have used the word "level" . The descriptor should have been FLAT. That would have avoided all confusion. Jus Sayn !
grin.gif
</div></div>

He was using a level as a straight edge. He never once said anything about it being level.
 
Re: I got it...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bill Larson</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> LAP RINGS.......</div></div>

This and/or bedding the base to keep it true. If you dont own a lapping rod already, this may be cheaper and just as effective with high quality rings.

http://youtu.be/aoW5bHQqgis
 
Re: I got it...

Mitch, I did the checks for that. There was no gap under the rail. if there had been, torquing it down would have bowed it out rather than give me a slight (barely noticeable, but there) dip over the ejection port.
Like I said, I'll check with alignment bars once I get rings to see what the issue really is, and I'll probably end up lapping my rings.
 
Re: I got it...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tahoe333</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
You probably shouldn't have used the word "level" . The descriptor should have been FLAT. That would have avoided all confusion. Jus Sayn !
grin.gif
</div></div>

yeah, probably not... I forget that most people don't actually read every written word.
 
Re: I got it...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dustin1984</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Mitch, I did the checks for that. There was no gap under the rail. if there had been, torquing it down would have bowed it out rather than give me a slight (barely noticeable, but there) dip over the ejection port.
Like I said, I'll check with alignment bars once I get rings to see what the issue really is, and I'll probably end up lapping my rings. </div></div>

Or just get a one piece mount like an AI. The shape of the rail isn't going to matter then.

Joe
 
Re: I got it...

Joe, you want to spend the extra money on it and give it to me, you do that. But for me, the rail is brand new and I intend to work with it as is. I have money going enough ways that buying ANOTHER new mount is out of the question. I'll buy rings and lap if necessary.
 
Re: I got it...

I'm talking about a picatinny (or dovetail, you didn't specify) mount that fits on your existing NF mount.

The AI mount is not much more expensive than a good set of rings.

I always opt for a one piece mount over rings.

Joe
 
Re: I got it...

send me a link so I can have a look then please
smile.gif

scratch that... I see someone already did... and with the exception of the Larue, they all appear to be 34mm...
 
Re: I got it...

<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OorpZlG28fI"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OorpZlG28fI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>

Ol Larry will tell you how it is....
 
Re: I got it...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VJJPunisher</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While yer fapping away dont forget to lap yer bore </div></div>