• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Suppressors 4 days left to comment on atf41p. Please comment now.

TexasGunTrustLawyer

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Aug 11, 2011
630
47
57
Houston
www.texasguntrust.com
IMPORTANT. We have four days left to comment on atf41P. Please comment today!

The ATF cutoff is 4 days away. There are only 4,506 comments that have been received. It is time for everyone who has an NFA Gun Trust to make a comment on this rule.

So far, only 4500 comments have been received.

Make your comments right here:

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=ATF-2013-0001-0001

Please ask exe very NFA owner and non NFA firearms owners to comment against this rule.

Please forward this information to everyone that you know who owns a firearm. We need additional comments and we need them now!

I will be sending daily emails reminding everyone to make comments on this backdoor attack on our rights and urging everyone on this list to reach out to firearms owner that they know.

This is VERY important. If this rule passes, it will significantly impact your ability to purchase new silencers and short barrel rifles.

Please make the comment at: Comment on ATF41P here

The comments are generally centered around these topics:
LEGITIMATE Purpose: Trusts and other Legal Entities have a legitimate purpose.
ATF's Cost and Benefit Analysis is Flawed
Legitimate Uses of NFA Firearms
ATF uses false assumptions for CLEO refusals. My CLEO will not sign new Forms
Criminals do not use Registered NFA firearms and NFA Firearms are not used for Crimes.
ATF's Proposals will not prevent crime nor stop what they fear from being able to happen.

Here is a suggested comment:


Individual with "Corporations, LLC or Trust"
I am opposed to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives proposed rule, docket number ATF 41P, on transfers of NFA firearms to "legal entities" such as trusts and corporations. I have created a [TRUST - CORPORATION - LLC - Family Limited Partnership - ETC.] to make, receive and purchase Firearms and items that are regulated by the National Firearms Act. Based on my experience , the BATFE is wrong on MANY issues.

The BATFE is wrong in stating that law enforcement officials only refuse to sign off due to liability fears. That was not my experience. The refusal of CLEO's to sign forms is often politically motivated. In [NAME OF JURISDICTION], the [POLICE CHIEF/SHERIFF] refuses to sign off on these transfers because [EXPLAIN AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE SUCH AS STATEMENTS MADE TO APPLICANTS].

BATFE's estimate of the additional costs imposed by ATF41P are unrealistically low regarding the cost for photographs and fingerprints and fail to include the additional costs in fuel, wear and tear on my vehicles and the value of my time. BATFE's estimates that photographs would cost $8.00 and take an average of 50 minutes to obtain, and that fingerprints would cost $24.00 and take 60 minutes to obtain is also incorrect. In my experience, the costs and times are higher. It cost me [AMOUNT] to get photographs, which took [AMOUNT OF TIME]. And it cost me [AMOUNT] to get fingerprints, which took me [AMOUNT OF TIME]. BATFE considers the cost of providing documents to establish the existence of a "legal entity," based on an estimated average of 15 pages. My own [TRUST - CORPORATION - LLC - Family Limited Partnership - ETC] documents were [NUMBER] pages long.

These costs must be multiplied by the number of "responsible persons" on the application. The BATFE estimates only two responsible persons per legal entity. I believe that is a very low estimate. My own [TRUST - CORPORATION - LLC - Family Limited Partnership - ETC] includes [NUMBER] people who would qualify as "responsible persons" under ATF's definition.
The definition of "responsible person" is another issue of particular importance. The BATFE's wording is different for different types of entities. However, the BATFE's general definition would include anyone who "possesses, directly or indirectly, the power or authority ... to receive, possess, ship, transport, deliver, transfer, or otherwise dispose of a firearm for, or on behalf of" the entity. The laws on trusts and corporations are very complex. In my case, it would be very difficult for me to say accurately which of the parties in my [LEGAL ENTITY] fall under this definition. [EXPLAIN AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE SUCH AS CHILD TRUSTEES]. To get a clear answer on that, I would probably need to speak with a lawyer-another cost that ATF fails to consider.

I unequivocally oppose FINGERPRINTS and PHOTOGRAGHS for Responsible persons and the CLEO signoff requirements for any NFA transfer, and suggest the elimination of the CLEO signoff requirement in its entirety.
 
Last edited:
IMPORTANT. We have four days left to comment on atf41P. Please comment today!

The ATF cutoff is 4 days away. There are only 4,506 comments that have been received. It is time for everyone who has an NFA Gun Trust to make a comment on this rule.

So far, only 4500 comments have been received.

Make your comments right here:

Regulations.gov

Please ask exe very NFA owner and non NFA firearms owners to comment against this rule.

Please forward this information to everyone that you know who owns a firearm. We need additional comments and we need them now!

I will be sending daily emails reminding everyone to make comments on this backdoor attack on our rights and urging everyone on this list to reach out to firearms owner that they know.

This is VERY important. If this rule passes, it will significantly impact your ability to purchase new silencers and short barrel rifles.

Please make the comment at: Comment on ATF41P here

The comments are generally centered around these topics:
LEGITIMATE Purpose: Trusts and other Legal Entities have a legitimate purpose.
ATF's Cost and Benefit Analysis is Flawed
Legitimate Uses of NFA Firearms
ATF uses false assumptions for CLEO refusals. My CLEO will not sign new Forms
Criminals do not use Registered NFA firearms and NFA Firearms are not used for Crimes.
ATF's Proposals will not prevent crime nor stop what they fear from being able to happen.

Here is a suggested comment:


Individual with "Corporations, LLC or Trust"
I am opposed to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives proposed rule, docket number ATF 41P, on transfers of NFA firearms to "legal entities" such as trusts and corporations. I have created a [TRUST - CORPORATION - LLC - Family Limited Partnership - ETC.] to make, receive and purchase Firearms and items that are regulated by the National Firearms Act. Based on my experience , the BATFE is wrong on MANY issues.

The BATFE is wrong in stating that law enforcement officials only refuse to sign off due to liability fears. That was not my experience. The refusal of CLEO's to sign forms is often politically motivated. In [NAME OF JURISDICTION], the [POLICE CHIEF/SHERIFF] refuses to sign off on these transfers because [EXPLAIN AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE SUCH AS STATEMENTS MADE TO APPLICANTS].

BATFE's estimate of the additional costs imposed by ATF41P are unrealistically low regarding the cost for photographs and fingerprints and fail to include the additional costs in fuel, wear and tear on my vehicles and the value of my time. BATFE's estimates that photographs would cost $8.00 and take an average of 50 minutes to obtain, and that fingerprints would cost $24.00 and take 60 minutes to obtain is also incorrect. In my experience, the costs and times are higher. It cost me [AMOUNT] to get photographs, which took [AMOUNT OF TIME]. And it cost me [AMOUNT] to get fingerprints, which took me [AMOUNT OF TIME]. BATFE considers the cost of providing documents to establish the existence of a "legal entity," based on an estimated average of 15 pages. My own [TRUST - CORPORATION - LLC - Family Limited Partnership - ETC] documents were [NUMBER] pages long.

These costs must be multiplied by the number of "responsible persons" on the application. The BATFE estimates only two responsible persons per legal entity. I believe that is a very low estimate. My own [TRUST - CORPORATION - LLC - Family Limited Partnership - ETC] includes [NUMBER] people who would qualify as "responsible persons" under ATF's definition.
The definition of "responsible person" is another issue of particular importance. The BATFE's wording is different for different types of entities. However, the BATFE's general definition would include anyone who "possesses, directly or indirectly, the power or authority ... to receive, possess, ship, transport, deliver, transfer, or otherwise dispose of a firearm for, or on behalf of" the entity. The laws on trusts and corporations are very complex. In my case, it would be very difficult for me to say accurately which of the parties in my [LEGAL ENTITY] fall under this definition. [EXPLAIN AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE SUCH AS CHILD TRUSTEES]. To get a clear answer on that, I would probably need to speak with a lawyer-another cost that ATF fails to consider.

I unequivocally oppose FINGERPRINTS and PHOTOGRAGHS for Responsible persons and the CLEO signoff requirements for any NFA transfer, and suggest the elimination of the CLEO signoff requirement in its entirety.

Would it be bad to use this as my comment? Or do I need to think up one on my own? The only reason I haven't commented as of yet is because I have been really busy and haven't had the time to write up an extensive rebuttal. I don't want to comment and sound uneducated.
 
I submitted one yesterday, but it has not shown up yet for some odd reason. I focused on:

1.how they are gonna get spanked by the Supreme Court when they try to explain how a law firm should have to submit paperwork after the fact on all the new partners for perpetuity, when the firm owned the weapon for decades already;
2. or how their federal overreach is negatively impacting interstate commerce;
3. or how trusts and corporations are state regulated entities by nature and the Feds are overreaching here;
4. and how are they going to get Bank of America to submit prints, photos and paperwork if they are named as a co-trustee. I see revocable trusts with nonhuman trustees (trust companies, banks, etc.) every day.
 
We should start a best guess thread. Maybe they will split they the baby and modify the deal to require that at least one party be identified as a responsible party as a minimum and make them do the dog and pony show. Then they can crush that party if the weapon is found in a felons hands. Of course they could already crush the trustees now presumably if the weapon was found to be in the hands of a felon.

I honestly think that if the BATF pushes this issue, they are gonna get spanked on violation of the administrative law procedures AND for a gross overreach of a federal entity overburdening state regulated trust or entity laws. The Feds should have ZERO power to determine who may be appointed as a trustee in a Texas or Alaska trust, or to have some veto power on who can be a partner in a law firm that happens to own weapons. If a fellow has an Oklahoma bar license he meets the requirements presumably to be a partner in an Oklahoma law firm as far as the OK bar association and the State of OK is concerned.
 
Of course the courts can rationalize anything like Roberts illustrated by saying the individual mandate in obamacare is a "tax".
 
There are more than 8000 comments submitted, though less than 4000 have been posted.

I submitted my comments by fax last week. I wonder if that 8000 number includes mailed and faxed responses or if that's just the comments submitted via the regulations.gov website?
 
double the comments in less than a week is impressive. but i wish it was about 50,000 more.
 
Comments sent.


There's only 8K responses. There's way more than 8K suppressor, SBR, full auto, etc owners out there.


Show some support and comment now!